If we receive an IPv6 prefix e.g.: 2001:db8:100::/64 with nextop: 0.0.0.0, and
mp_nexthop: fc00::2, we should not treat this with an invalid nexthop because
of 0.0.0.0. We MUST check for MP_REACH attribute also and decide later if we
have at least one a valid nexthop.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
(cherry picked from commit a0d2734e87)
A redistribute cmd can have a route-map attached to it and adding the
match source-protocol to that route-map means BGP to filter which
protocol routes to accept among the bunch of routes zebra is sending.
Fixing this since this wasnt implemented earlier.
Ticket :#4119692
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajasekar Raja <rajasekarr@nvidia.com>
(cherry picked from commit 68358c0f92)
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
(cherry picked from commit f93e5aa166)
When trying to connect to a BGP peer that does not respons, the 'show
bgp neighbors' command does not give any indication on the local and
remote addresses used:
> # show bgp neighbors
> BGP neighbor is 192.0.2.150, remote AS 65500, local AS 65500, internal link
> Local Role: undefined
> Remote Role: undefined
> BGP version 4, remote router ID 0.0.0.0, local router ID 192.0.2.1
> BGP state = Connect
> [..]
> Connections established 0; dropped 0
> Last reset 00:00:04, Waiting for peer OPEN (n/a)
> Internal BGP neighbor may be up to 255 hops away.
> BGP Connect Retry Timer in Seconds: 120
> Next connect timer due in 117 seconds
> Read thread: off Write thread: off FD used: 27
The addressing information (address and port) are only available
when TCP session is established, whereas this information is present
at the system level:
> root@ubuntu2204:~# netstat -pan | grep 192.0.2.1
> tcp 0 0 192.0.2.1:179 192.0.2.150:38060 SYN_RECV -
> tcp 0 1 192.0.2.1:46526 192.0.2.150:179 SYN_SENT 488310/bgpd
Add the display for outgoing BGP session, as the information in
the getsockname() API provides information for connected streams.
When getpeername() API does not give any information, use the peer
configuration (destination port is encoded in peer->port).
> # show bgp neighbors
> BGP neighbor is 192.0.2.150, remote AS 65500, local AS 65500, internal link
> Local Role: undefined
> Remote Role: undefined
> BGP version 4, remote router ID 0.0.0.0, local router ID 192.0.2.1
> BGP state = Connect
> [..]
> Connections established 0; dropped 0
> Last reset 00:00:16, Waiting for peer OPEN (n/a)
> Local host: 192.0.2.1, Local port: 46084
> Foreign host: 192.0.2.150, Foreign port: 179
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
(cherry picked from commit 78ce63952a)
When attempting to get the src and destination addresses of a given
connection, the API may return the NULL pointer, but further code
in bgp_zebra_nexthop_set() already does a check about the given
pointer.
Relaxing the error code for all the returned adressing.
Fixes: 1ff9a34058 ("bgpd: bgpd-fsm-fix.patch")
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
(cherry picked from commit ba71303099)
Without this patch we set only the first path for the route (if multiple exist)
as LLGR stale and stop doing that for the rest of the paths, which is wrong.
Fixes: 1479ed2fb3 ("bgpd: Implement LLGR helper mode")
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
We iterated over all bgp_path_info's, but once we remove the path, we didn't
check for other paths under the same bgp_dest.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
If we set router-id, e.g. `router-id x.x.x.x`, then we have:
```
pc.donatas.net# show ip ospf | include Router ID
OSPF Routing Process, Router ID: x.x.x.x
```
But once we remove it (`no router-id x.x.x.x`), the old router-id remains.
This is kinda OK, but to be consistent with OSPFv3 we should use what Zebra
already has, instead of retaining the old one.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1073e0f9b3)
A new command is `ospf router-id ...`, but the old one is also valid. Just a no
form was missed.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
(cherry picked from commit 80bfe6784f)
Before this patch, if we set something like:
```
bgp extcommunity-list expanded 1234 permit admin
```
In running config we have:
```
bgp extcommunity-list 1234 seq 5 permit admin
```
That leads to incorrect rendering, even more the line can't be deleted.
With this fix we treat numbered community-list only if it's inside the range
1-500, otherwise it's a non-numbered clist.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4c1ee29116)
The algorithm number is encoded on 8 bits and does not require
an unsigned 32 bit value to store the value.
Fixes: cc4926c128 ("isisd,yang: add algorithm-prefix-sid configuration tree")
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8e861a75e8)
we have
(gdb) p *path->attr->aspath
$1 = {refcnt = 3, segments = 0x0, json = 0x0, str = 0x55723d0b7470 "", str_len = 0, asnotation = ASNOTATION_PLAIN}
It looks like this aspath is empty, resulting in a size 0 and NULL pointer for path->attr->aspath->segments which leads to the SIGSEGV
fixe: return 0 when segments is null.
Signed-off-by: Francois Dumontet <francois.dumontet@6wind.com>
(cherry picked from commit ee2f1b85cf)
Introduce a command to stop bgpd from enabling IPv6 router advertisement
messages sending on interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Sokolovskiy <sokolmish@gmail.com>
Fix the display of the local label in show bgp.
> r1# show bgp ipv4 labeled-unicast 172.16.2.2/32
> BGP routing table entry for 172.16.2.2/32, version 2
> Local label: 16 <---- MISSING
> Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default, vrf (null))
> Advertised to non peer-group peers:
> 192.168.1.2
> 65501
> 192.168.1.2 from 192.168.1.2 (172.16.2.2)
> Origin IGP, metric 0, valid, external, best (First path received)
> Remote label: 3
> Last update: Fri Oct 25 17:55:45 2024
Fixes: 67f67ba481 ("bgpd: Drop label_ntop/label_pton functions")
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
(cherry picked from commit e7b3276ace)
This only matters to single hop nodes that are adjacent to the bsr. More common
with IPv6 where LL address is used in PIM as the primary address. If the BSR IP
happens to be an address on the same interface, the receiving pim router
rejects the BSR address because it expects the BSR IP to resolve via the LL address
even if we have a connected route for the same BSR IP subnet. Effectively, we want to
allow rpf to be resolved via secondary IPs with connected routes on the same interface,
and not limit them to primary addresses.
Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
(cherry picked from commit d23a7d0949)
For consistency between RIB and BGP, the aigp comparison should
be made after the local route check in bgp bestpath selection.
Signed-off-by: Enke Chen <enchen@paloaltonetworks.com>
Include SID structure information when removing an SRv6 End.DT4 or End.DT6 SID
from the forwarding plane.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <cscarpit@cisco.com>
Include SID structure information when installing an SRv6 End.DT6 or End.DT4 SID
in the forwarding plane.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <cscarpit@cisco.com>
OAD is treated as an _internal_ BGP peer, and some of the rules (including BGP
attributes) can be relaxed.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
(cherry picked from commit e63b1520f1)
The value of 0 is accepted from peers, and can also be set by the
route-map "set aigp-metric igp-metric". For coonsistency, it should
be allowed in "set aigp-metric <value>" as well.
Signed-off-by: Enke Chen <enchen@paloaltonetworks.com>
(cherry picked from commit e07f38a43f)
