Fully specified routes are useful when you need to ensure that the
nexthop address is reachable through the specified interface.
Addresses Issue #641.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
This is a preliminary step to join both functions into one later.
The main idea here is to make these functions have separate arguments
for the nexthop address and the nexthop interface, and adjust the call
sites appropriately. Having an argument that could be a nexthop address
OR a nexthop interface was making the code very hard to follow. With
this simplification, a lot of code duplication was removed and now both
functions look very similar.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
We don't need to enforce that the interface exists because the route can
be activated later once the interface becomes available. We already do
this for IPv4 routes and IPv6 routes with both a nexthop address and a
nexthop interface.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
When we have both a LL and a Global address,
use what the attribute wants for comparison
instead of assuming Global than LL.
This was causing BGP to install v6 routes
that used the LL as the nexthop, where
the global address was different and
being used as the basis for comparison.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
The code path for a deleted interface was calling
zebra with a IFINDEX_DELETED, which caused zebra
to bitch and moan about the issue. Since the
only thing this function does is call zebra
to deregister the RA stuff, don't set the
ifindex to DELETED till afterwords.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
- The 'reject' keyword was being lost
- Hide the "ip route A.B.C.D A.B.C.D" config options since these will be
displayed as "ip route A.B.C.D/X"
Also:
- Add documentation on mailing list
- Update mentions of unit tests
- Update process description
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com>
Commit 8f942af90 introduced a bug while silencing a clang warning. Silence
the warning in a different way to fix our red-black tree implementation.
Fixes#841.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
We should preserve the original indentation to make it easier to keep
these files in sync with the upstream.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
This reverts commit c14777c6bf.
clang 5 is not widely available enough for people to indent with. This
is particularly problematic when rebasing/adjusting branches.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
Before the fix NHT had each path resolving via swp1
cel-redxp-10# show ip route 20.0.11.253
Routing entry for 20.0.11.0/24
Known via "bgp", distance 20, metric 0, best
Last update 00:00:20 ago
* 169.254.0.1, via swp1
* 169.254.0.17, via swp2
cel-redxp-10#
cel-redxp-10# show ip nht
[snip]
20.0.11.253
resolved via bgp
via 169.254.0.1, swp1
via 169.254.0.1, swp1
Client list: pim(fd 19)
After the fix
cel-redxp-10# show ip nht
[snip]
20.0.11.253
resolved via bgp
via 169.254.0.1, swp1
via 169.254.0.17, swp2
Client list: pim(fd 19)
This tries to heave a branch over the reindentation step. Somewhat
tested, don't trust it blindly...
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
eigrpd will successfully accept `(conf)# route-map foo ...` because it
is not sent to eigrpd from vtysh, but of course, this is the classic
node sync syndrome.
Since eigrpd apparently doesn't support proper routemaps yet just add
the cli so we can suppress the vtysh errors.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@cumulusnetworks.com>
