Initial run of topotests on my machine takes ~210 seconds
With these changes we are at ~40 seconds
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
1. Minor change in distribute-list update timer based on lsa flag.
Co-authored-by: harios <hari@niralnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Kaushik <kaushik@niralnetworks.com>
1. Added test to verify bgp vrf dynamic route leak functionality
2. Total execution time is ~8 mins
3. Added kernel version check, these script would be run for kernel version >= 4.19
Signed-off-by: Kuldeep Kashyap <kashyapk@vmware.com>
Given a received nexthop update, only send down an update to the
relevant nexthop group. Avoid sending down superfluous updates
Signed-off-by: Wesley Coakley <wcoakley@nvidia.com>
1. Removed the VRF_DEFAULT dependency from ospf6d.
2. The dependency on show command still exist
will be fixed when the ospf6 master is available.
Co-authored-by: Harios <hari@niralnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Kaushik <kaushik@niralnetworks.com>
When deleting a dynamic peer, unsetting md5 password would cause
it to be unset on the listener allowing unauthenticated connections
from any peer in the range.
Check for dynamic peers in peer delete and avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Pat Ruddy <pat@voltanet.io>
When setting authentication on a BGP peer in a VRF the listener is
looked up from a global list. However there is no check that the
listener is the one associated with the VRF being configured. This
can result in the wrong listener beiong configured with a password,
leaving the intended listener in an open authentication state.
To simplify this lookup stash a pointer to the bgp instance in
the listener on creating (in the same way as is done for NS-based
VRFS).
Signed-off-by: Pat Ruddy <pat@voltanet.io>
When not using the transactional CLI mode, do not display a
warning when a YANG-modeled commmand doesn't perform any effective
configuration change.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
1. Added new API for add/delete acl with route map notify.
Co-authored-by: harios <hari@niralnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Kaushik <kaushik@niralnetworks.com>
since the addition of srte_color to the comparison for bgp nexthops
it is possible to have several nexthops per prefix but since zebra
only sores a per prefix registration we should not unregister for
nh notifications for a prefix unti all the nexthops for that prefix
have been deleted. Otherwise we can get into a deadlock situation
where BGP thinks we have registered but we have unregistered from zebra.
Signed-off-by: Pat Ruddy <pat@voltanet.io>
Extend the NHT code so that only the affected BGP routes are affected
whenever an SR-policy is updated on zebra.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Example configuration:
route-map SET_SR_POLICY permit 10
set sr-te color 1
!
router bgp 1
bgp router-id 1.1.1.1
neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 1
neighbor 2.2.2.2 update-source lo
address-family ipv4 unicast
neighbor 2.2.2.2 next-hop-self
neighbor 2.2.2.2 route-map SET_SR_POLICY in
exit-address-family
!
!
Learned BGP routes from 2.2.2.2 are mapped to the SR-TE Policy
which is uniquely determined by the BGP nexthop (2.2.2.2 in this
case) and the SR-TE color in the route-map.
Co-authored-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Co-authored-by: GalaxyGorilla <sascha@netdef.org>
Co-authored-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
Fist, routing tables aren't the most appropriate data structure
to store nexthops and imported routes since we don't need to do
longest prefix matches with that information.
Second, by converting the NHT code to use rb-trees, we can index
the nexthops using additional information, not only the destination
address. This will be useful later to index bgpd's nexthops by
both destination and SR-TE color.
Co-authored-by: Sebastien Merle <sebastien@netdef.org>
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
1. MAC ref of a zero ESI was accidentally creating a new ES with zero
ES id.
2. When an ES was deleted and re-added the ES was not being sent to BGP
because of a stale flag that suppressed the update as a dup.
Signed-off-by: Anuradha Karuppiah <anuradhak@cumulusnetworks.com>
When we get a rib deletion event and we already have
that particular route node in the queue to be reprocessed,
just note that someone from kernel land has done us dirty
and allow it to be cleaned up by normal processing
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Imagine a situation where a interface is bouncing up/down.
The interface comes up and daemons like pbr will get a nht
tracking callback for a connected interface up and will install
the routes down to zebra. At this same time the interface can
go down. But since zebra is busy handling route changes ( from pbr )
it has not read the netlink message and can get into a situation
where the route resolves properly and then we attempt to install
it into the kernel( which is rejected ). If the interface
bounces back up fast at this point, the down then up netlink
message will be read and create two route entries off the connected
route node. Zebra will then enqueue both route entries for future processing.
After this processing happens the down/up is collapsed into an up
and nexthop tracking sees no changes and does not inform any upper
level protocol( in this case pbr ) that nexthop tracking has changed.
So pbr still believes the nexthops are good but the routes are not
installed since pbr has taken no action.
Fix this by immediately running rnh when we signal a connected
route entry is scheduled for removal. This should cause
upper level protocols to get a rnh notification for the small
amount of time that the connected route was bouncing around like
a madman.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Avoid unnecessary use of StringIO in one place, use version-
dependent method in another. Remove a couple of other py2->py3
problems.
Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@voltanet.io>
