Move the pbr hash creation to be after the update release
and dplane install. Now that rules are installed in a separate
dplane pthread, we can have scenarios where we have an interface
flapping and we install/remove rules sufficiently fast enough we
could issue what we think is an update for an identical rule and
end up releasing the rule right after we created it and sent it to
the dplane. This solves the problem of recving duplicate rules
during interface flapping.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
Only handle an interface update in the nexthop tracking code
if the nexthop in question was set with an interface to point
out of. If the nexthop is GW only, the interface update could
be unrelated but have overlapping address space. Let that be
handled elsewhere.
Ex)
```
5.5.5.0/30 dev dummyDoof proto kernel scope link src 5.5.5.1
5.5.5.0/24 dev goofDummy proto kernel scope link src 5.5.5.1
[root@alfred frr-2]# ip ro show table 10000
default via 5.5.5.2 dev dummyDoof proto pbr metric 20
[root@alfred frr-2]# ip link set goofDummy down
[root@alfred frr-2]# ip ro show table 10000
[root@alfred frr-2]# ip link set goofDummy up
[root@alfred frr-2]# ip ro show table 10000
```
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
The output from `show thread cpu` was not lined up appropriately
for the header line. As well as the function name we were
calling in the output. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
```
2523558-==2523558==
2523558-==2523558== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
2523558:==2523558== at 0x47F242: bgp_notify_admin_message (bgp_debug.c:505)
2523558-==2523558== by 0x47F242: bgp_notify_print (bgp_debug.c:534)
2523558-==2523558== by 0x4BA9BC: bgp_notify_receive (bgp_packet.c:1905)
2523558-==2523558== by 0x4BA9BC: bgp_process_packet (bgp_packet.c:2602)
2523558-==2523558== by 0x4904B7E: thread_call (thread.c:1681)
2523558-==2523558== by 0x48CAA27: frr_run (libfrr.c:1126)
2523558-==2523558== by 0x474B1A: main (bgp_main.c:540)
2523558-==2523558== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
2523558:==2523558== at 0x4BA33D: bgp_process_packet (bgp_packet.c:2529)
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
This command was put in place to allow upgrades for the
neighbor command from the BGP_NODE and have it put
into the ipv4 uni node instead. Since this
utterly kills the yang conversion. I believe we need
to remove this. Since people upgrading will just loose
the route-map applicatoin( if they are using such an old
config ) and RFC 8212 will come into play. They'll figure
it out pretty fast.
Fixes: #7983
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The calling function of ospf_nbr_nbma_lookup_next calls
this function and then immediately returns when it
gets the NULL. Just cleanup a bit more code.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
I am not even sure what the goal of this code was in any
way shape fashion or form. But since it's pbr_nht.c
I as the original author should know... But I don't.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Looks like the #if 0 code in this place was for ESI support
on solaris. We do not support solaris anymore. So let's
remove with prejudice.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The #if 0 code in ospfd, has not been compiled since at least
2012. If we are at least 9 years old at this point with no effort
to use or save, we should just get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Unconfig not resetting the peer-group member allowas_in[afi][safi]
This is causing remote route to be accept.
Signed-off-by: Kishore Kunal <kishorekunal01@broadcom.com>
