The dest->selected_fib should be reported in json output
so that we can debug subtle conditions a bit better in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When we get a neighbor entry in zebra we start processing it.
Let's add some additional debugs to the processing so that when
it bails out and we don't use the data, we know the reason.
This should help in debugging the problems from why bgp does
not appear to have data associated with a neighbor entry
in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
The check for an entry being NUD_PERMANENT has already been done
there is no need to do it twice.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
VRF Route Leak's
show bgp vrf all ipv4 unicast route-leak
is not supported with `all` keyword.
Testing Done:
bl1# show bgp vrf all ipv4 unicast route-leak
Instance default:
This VRF is not importing IPv4 Unicast routes from any other VRF
This VRF is not exporting IPv4 Unicast routes to any other VRF
Instance vrf3:
This VRF is importing IPv4 Unicast routes from the following VRFs:
vrf1
Import RT(s): 144.1.1.2:10
This VRF is exporting IPv4 Unicast routes to the following VRFs:
vrf1
RD: 144.1.3.2:9
Export RT: 144.1.3.2:9
Instance vrf1:
This VRF is importing IPv4 Unicast routes from the following VRFs:
vrf3
Import RT(s): 144.1.3.2:9
This VRF is exporting IPv4 Unicast routes to the following VRFs:
vrf3
RD: 144.1.1.2:10
Export RT: 144.1.1.2:10
Signed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@cumulusnetworks.com>
Views are perfectly valid and should be allowed to connect.
In a bgp instance scenario the vrf_id will always be UNKNOWN,
so allow it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
If a person who is compiling FRR does not specify the
multipath number on configure we are defaulting to a ecmp of 1.
Let's change this to 16. In this day and age most everything
supports actual ecmp.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Privs escalation is process-wide, and a multi-threaded process
can deadlock. This adds a mutex and a counter to the privs
object, preventing multiple threads from making the privs
escalation system call.
Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@voltanet.io>
Suppose we have 2 routers A and B. Both Router A and B have
the same priority of 1000. Router A is the elected DR.
Now suppose B lowers his priority to 1. He still looses the
DR election and we are not sending a hello with the new priority.
Immediately after this A's priority is also lowered to 1, it
looses the election and sends the hello. B receives this hello
and elects A as the DR( since it has the better ip address)
At this point A believes B is the DR, and B believes A is the
DR until such time that the normal hello from B is sent to A,
which if timed correctly can be a significant amount of time).
This code just causes a hello to be sent if the priority is
changed. Now both sides will be able to converge quickly
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
bgp update can contain router mac address same as one of SVIs
mac address, during processing of evpn route in bpg_update()
check for the flag is set and filter the route from installing.
This check is done prior to attribute lookup or storing in database.
Parse check and set is done once during attribute parse
because all the NLRIs containing evpn prefix
(type-2/type-5) will have same exntended community applicable.
Ticket:CM-23674
Reviewed By:CCR-8336
Testing Done:
Signed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@cumulusnetworks.com>
Any evpn bgp update message comes with router mac extended
community, which can potentially contain the madd adddress
same as any of the local SVIs (L3VNI) MAC address.
Set route mac exist and during route processing in
bgp_update() filter the route.
Ticket:CM-23674
Reviewed By:CCR-8336
Testing Done:
Configure L3vni mac on TORS1 which is similar to TORC11
L3vni MAC. When TORC11 received the EVPN update with
Router mac extended community, this check rejected the
BGP update message.
Signed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@cumulusnetworks.com>
Found in testing that in a certain sequence, a neighbor's peer-group
membership would be lost. This fix resolves that issue. Additionally
found that "no neighbor swp1 remote-as 2" would sometimes leave the
config with "neighbor swp1 remote-as 0" rather than removing from the
config. That one is also resolved.
Signed-off-by: Don Slice <dslice@cumulusnetworks.com>
When a vrf is deleted we need to tell the zebra_router that we have
finished using the tables we are keeping track of. This will allow
us to properly cleanup the data structures associated with them.
This fixes this valgrind error found:
==8579== Invalid read of size 8
==8579== at 0x430034: zvrf_id (zebra_vrf.h:167)
==8579== by 0x432366: rib_process (zebra_rib.c:1580)
==8579== by 0x432366: process_subq (zebra_rib.c:2092)
==8579== by 0x432366: meta_queue_process (zebra_rib.c:2188)
==8579== by 0x48C99FE: work_queue_run (workqueue.c:291)
==8579== by 0x48C3788: thread_call (thread.c:1607)
==8579== by 0x48A2E9E: frr_run (libfrr.c:1011)
==8579== by 0x41316A: main (main.c:473)
==8579== Address 0x5aeb750 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 4,424 free'd
==8579== at 0x4839A0C: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:540)
==8579== by 0x438914: zebra_vrf_delete (zebra_vrf.c:279)
==8579== by 0x48C4225: vrf_delete (vrf.c:243)
==8579== by 0x48C4225: vrf_delete (vrf.c:217)
==8579== by 0x4151CE: netlink_vrf_change (if_netlink.c:364)
==8579== by 0x416810: netlink_link_change (if_netlink.c:1189)
==8579== by 0x41C1FC: netlink_parse_info (kernel_netlink.c:904)
==8579== by 0x41C2D3: kernel_read (kernel_netlink.c:389)
==8579== by 0x48C3788: thread_call (thread.c:1607)
==8579== by 0x48A2E9E: frr_run (libfrr.c:1011)
==8579== by 0x41316A: main (main.c:473)
==8579== Block was alloc'd at
==8579== at 0x483AB1A: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:762)
==8579== by 0x48A6030: qcalloc (memory.c:110)
==8579== by 0x4389EF: zebra_vrf_alloc (zebra_vrf.c:382)
==8579== by 0x438A42: zebra_vrf_new (zebra_vrf.c:93)
==8579== by 0x48C40AD: vrf_get (vrf.c:209)
==8579== by 0x415144: netlink_vrf_change (if_netlink.c:319)
==8579== by 0x415E90: netlink_interface (if_netlink.c:653)
==8579== by 0x41C1FC: netlink_parse_info (kernel_netlink.c:904)
==8579== by 0x4163E8: interface_lookup_netlink (if_netlink.c:760)
==8579== by 0x42BB37: zebra_ns_enable (zebra_ns.c:130)
==8579== by 0x42BC5E: zebra_ns_init (zebra_ns.c:208)
==8579== by 0x4130F4: main (main.c:401)
This can be found by: `ip link del <VRF DEVICE NAME>` then `ip link add <NAME> type vrf table X` again and
then attempting to use the vrf.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Add the ability for the sharp zebra code to pass down the
vrf that we want to watch. At this point in time, we
cannot use it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Add a bit of code to allow the end user to specify a [vrf NAME]
for route installation/deletion.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Modify the sharp code to allow for vrf route installation. At
this point in time the code is nascent. Future commits will turn
on this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When we install a new route into the kernel always use
REPLACE. Else if the route is already there it can
be translated into an append with the flags we are
using.
This is especially true for the way we handle pbr
routes as that we are re-installing the same route
entry from pbr at the moment.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
The code that causes the bottleneck has been written generically to
handle the below two cases:
a) When a new aggregate-address is configured.
b) When new routes, that can be aggregated under an existing
aggregate-address, are received.
This change optimizes the code that handles case-(b).
Signed-off-by: NaveenThanikachalam <nthanikachal@vmware.com>
With this commit:
1) The code to manage the large-communities attribute of the routes that are
aggregatable under a configured aggregate-address is introduced.
2) The code to compute the aggregate-route's large-communities attribute is
introduced.
Signed-off-by: NaveenThanikachalam <nthanikachal@vmware.com>
With this commit:
1) The code to manage the extended-communities attribute of the routes that are
aggregatable under a configured aggregate-address is introduced.
2) The code to compute the aggregate-route's extended-communities attribute is
introduced.
Signed-off-by: NaveenThanikachalam <nthanikachal@vmware.com>
With this commit:
1) The code to manage the communities attribute of the routes that are
aggregatable under a configured aggregate-address is introduced.
2) The code to compute the aggregate-route's communities attribute is
introduced.
Signed-off-by: NaveenThanikachalam <nthanikachal@vmware.com>
With this commit:
1) 'struct bgp_aggregate' is moved to bgp_route.h from bgp_route.c
2) Hashes to accommodate the as-path, communities, extended-communities and
large-communities attributes of all the routes aggregated by an
aggregate route is introduced in 'struct bgp_aggregate'.
3) Place-holders for the aggregate route's as-path, communities,
extended-communities and large-communities attributes are introduced in
'struct bgp_aggregate'.
4) The code to manage the as-path of the routes that are aggregatable under
a configured aggregate-address is introduced.
5) The code to compute the aggregate-route's as-path is introduced.
Signed-off-by: NaveenThanikachalam <nthanikachal@vmware.com>
