As of Sep 25 2023, RTD projects require config files to build. This
patch is necessary for docs to continue to build.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@qlyoung.net>
The documentation pages on checkpatch and CSPF were not reachable
because they were not included in any toctree. Include them in the tree!
Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <qlyoung@qlyoung.net>
When the config node is entered in file-lock mode, we should actually
remember it to correctly apply the workaround in `vtysh_exit`.
Otherwise, the file-lock mode is dropped once we exit any node one level
below the config node.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
When the configuration node is entered in file-lock mode, candidate
and running datastores are locked. Any configuration change is followed
by an implicit commit which leads to a crash of mgmtd, because double
lock is prohibited by an assert. When working in file-lock mode, we
shouldn't do implicit commits which is disabled by allowing pending
configuration changes.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Align to the release rules:
Releases are scheduled in a 4-month cycle on the first Tuesday each March/July/November.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
When we accept a connection, we try to set TTL for the socket, but the socket
is not yet created/assigned and we are trying to set it on the wrong socket fd.
```
[Event] connection from 127.0.0.1 fd 25, active peer status 3 fd -1
can't set sockopt IP_TTL 255 to socket -1
bgp_set_socket_ttl: Can't set TxTTL on peer (rtrid 0.0.0.0) socket, err = 9
Unable to set min/max TTL on peer 127.0.0.1, Continuing
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
No such thing exists.
/root/frr/doc/user/ospfd.rst:624: WARNING: Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "frr".
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
/root/frr/doc/user/ospfd.rst:609: WARNING: Bullet list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Coverity is complaining that vty->state could be VTY_PASSFD here. It
can't, it really shouldn't, and if it actually is then something went
seriously wrong somewhere earlier so assert()ing out is the best thing
to do.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
The socket has been closed in `ssmpingd_setsockopt()` in the wrong cases,
so remove the redundant closing socket from outer layer.
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <anlan_cs@tom.com>
Fix the following warning:
tests/topotests/bgp_srv6l3vpn_sid/test_bgp_srv6l3vpn_sid.py:42
/media/SharedUTM/workspace/frr/tests/topotests/bgp_srv6l3vpn_sid/test_bgp_srv6l3vpn_sid.py:42: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence '\ '
In test_bgp_srv6l3vpn_sid.py we have a comment containing some '\'
characters. Python mistakenly tries to interpret such "\" characters
as escape sequences, which leads to the above warning.
Let's tell Python to treat the comment as a raw string,
so that it simply treats backslashes as literal characters rather than
escape sequences.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <cscarpit@cisco.com>
When deleting a duplicated prefix list entry don't announce the change
to route map listeners, otherwise they will be removing rules that
shouldn't be removed causing the prefix that still exist in the
prefix-list to be not evaluated anymore.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Avoid having something like this in outputs:
Before:
```
munet> r1 shi vtysh -c 'show bgp dampening damp'
BGP table version is 10, local router ID is 10.10.10.1, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 65001
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network From Reuse Path
*d 2001:db8:1::1/128
2001:db8::2 (null) 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:2::1/128
2001:db8::2 (null) 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:3::1/128
2001:db8::2 (null) 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:4::1/128
2001:db8::2 (null) 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:5::1/128
2001:db8::2 (null) 65002 ?
Displayed 5 routes and 5 total paths
munet> r1 shi vtysh -c 'show bgp dampening flap'
BGP table version is 10, local router ID is 10.10.10.1, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 65001
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network From Flaps Duration Reuse Path
*d 2001:db8:1::1/128
2001:db8::2 2 00:03:10 (null) 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:2::1/128
2001:db8::2 2 00:03:10 (null) 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:3::1/128
2001:db8::2 2 00:03:10 (null) 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:4::1/128
2001:db8::2 2 00:03:10 (null) 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:5::1/128
2001:db8::2 2 00:03:10 (null) 65002 ?
Displayed 5 routes and 5 total paths
```
After:
```
munet> r1 shi vtysh -c 'show bgp dampening damp '
BGP table version is 10, local router ID is 10.10.10.1, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 65001
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network From Reuse Path
*d 2001:db8:1::1/128
2001:db8::2 00:00:00 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:2::1/128
2001:db8::2 00:00:00 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:3::1/128
2001:db8::2 00:00:00 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:4::1/128
2001:db8::2 00:00:00 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:5::1/128
2001:db8::2 00:00:00 65002 ?
Displayed 5 routes and 5 total paths
munet> r1 shi vtysh -c 'show bgp dampening flap'
BGP table version is 10, local router ID is 10.10.10.1, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 65001
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network From Flaps Duration Reuse Path
*d 2001:db8:1::1/128
2001:db8::2 2 00:00:15 00:00:00 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:2::1/128
2001:db8::2 2 00:00:15 00:00:00 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:3::1/128
2001:db8::2 2 00:00:15 00:00:00 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:4::1/128
2001:db8::2 2 00:00:15 00:00:00 65002 ?
*d 2001:db8:5::1/128
2001:db8::2 2 00:00:15 00:00:00 65002 ?
Displayed 5 routes and 5 total paths
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
When BGP is sending updates to peers on a neighbor up event
it was noticed that the bgp updates being sent were in reverse
order being sent to the first peer.
Imagine r1 -- r2 -- r3. r1 and r2 are ebgp peers and
r2 and r3 are ebgp peers. r1's interface to r2 is currently
shutdown. Prior to this fix the send order would look like this:
r1 -> r2 send of routes to r2 and then they would be installed in order
received:
10.0.0.12 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.11 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.10 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.9 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.8 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.7 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.6 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.5 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.4 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.3 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.2 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.1 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
r2 would then send these routes to r3 and then they would be installed
in order received:
10.0.0.1 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.2 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.3 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.4 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.5 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.6 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.7 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.8 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.9 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.10 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.11 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.12 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
Not that big of a deal right? Well imagine a situation where r1 is
originating several ten's of thousands of routes. It sends routes to r2
r2 is processing routes but in reverse order and at the same time it
is sending routes to r3, in the correct order of the bgp table.
r3 will have the early 10.0.0.1/32 routes installed and start forwarding
while r2 will not have those routes installed yet( since they were at the
end and zebra is slightly slower for processing routes than bgp is ).
Ensure that the order sent is a true FIFO. What is happening is that
there is an update fifo which stores all routes. And off that FIFO
is a bgp advertise attribute list which stores the list of prefixes
which share the same attribute that allow for more efficient packing
this list was being stored in reverse order causing the problem for
the initial send. When adding items to this list put them at the
end so we keep the fifo order that is traversed when we walk through
the bgp table.
After the fix:
r2 installation order:
10.0.0.0 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.1 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.2 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.3 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.4 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.5 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.6 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.7 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.8 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.9 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.10 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.11 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.12 nhid 39 via 192.168.8.2 dev leaf2-eth5 proto bgp metric 20
r3 installation order:
10.0.0.0 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.1 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.2 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.3 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.4 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.5 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.6 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.7 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.8 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.9 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.10 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.11 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
10.0.0.12 nhid 12 via 192.168.61.2 dev spine2-eth1 proto bgp metric 20
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
