FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
The lsa->expire thread is for keeping track of when we
are expecting to expire(remove/delete) a lsa. There
are situations where we just decide to straight up
delete the lsa, but we are not ensuring that the
lsa is not already setup for expiration.
In that case just stop the expiry thread and
do the deletion.
Additionally there was a case where ospf6d was
just dropping the fact that a thread was already
scheduled for expiration. In that case we
should just setup the timer again and it will
reset it appropriately.
Fixes: #9721
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
1) Do not explicitly set the thread pointer to NULL.
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
2) Fix mixup of `struct eigrp_interface` and `struct eigrp`
usage of the same thread pointer.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Do not explicitly set the thread pointer to NULL.
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
1) Remove `struct thread *` pointers that are never used
2) Do not explicitly set the thread pointer to NULL.
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
With v6 interface based peering, we send the global as well as the LL address
as nexthops to the peer. When either of these were removed on the interface
we were not necessarily resetting the connection. Leaving bgp in a state
where the peer had reachability for addresses that are no longer in use.
Modify the code that when we receive an interface address deletion
event. Check to see that we are using the v6 address as nexthops
for that peer and if so, tell it to reset.
I initially struggled with a hard reset of the peer or a clear but
choose to follow other places in the code that we noticed address
changes that resulted in hard resets.
Ticket: #2799568
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Description:
As per the RFC 3623 section 3.2,
OSPF nbr shouldn't be deleted even in unsuccessful helper exit.
1. Made the changes to keep neighbour even after exit.
2. Restart the dead timer after expiry in helper. Otherwise, Restarter
will be in FULL state in helper forever until it receives the 'hello'.
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Girada <rgirada@vmware.com>
When a regular access-list is updated, we should update references to
regular access-lists, not as-path access-lists.
Fixes#9707.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Problem Statement:
Multiple struct compare using memcmp, which might result in issue due to
structure padding/alignment.
Fix:
The code changes involve structure member by member comparison to
remove any issues related to padding/alignment.
Signed-off-by: Manoj Naragund <mnaragund@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit 67db821a1d6d68b19862d50b68ed19278c5f2422)
There's a helper function to check whether the interface is loopback or
VRF - if_is_loopback_or_vrf. Let's use it whenever we need to check that.
There's no functional change in this commit.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Deleting a mesh-group member no longer deletes the mesh-group.
Complete bug description at:
https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/9664
Signed-off-by: Adriano Marto Reis <adrianomarto@gmail.com>
Pass down the safi for when we need address
resolution. At this point in time we are
hard coding the safi to SAFI_UNICAST.
Future commits will take advantage of this.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
PIM is going to need to be able to send down the address it is
trying to resolve in the multicast rib. We need a way to signal
this to the end developer. Start the conversion by adding the
ability to have a safi. But only allow SAFI_UNICAST at the moment.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
