Display on which VRF/view the neighbor was not found. Useful when
selecting "vrf all".
Before patch:
No such neighbor in this view/vrf
After patch:
No such neighbor in VRF default
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Issue: There was an error reported by Pylint regarding "expected" keyword:
Unexpected keyword argument 'expected' in function call (unexpected-keyword-arg)
Fix: We have defined expected keyword in all topojson APIs.
Signed-off-by: Kuldeep Kashyap <kashyapk@vmware.com>
Following functionality is covered:
+--------+ BGP +--------+ BGP +--------+ +--------+
SN1 | | IPv4/v6 | | EVPN | | | |
======+ Host1 +---------+ PE1 +------+ PE2 +------+ Host2 +
| | | | | | | |
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+ +--------+
Host1 is connected to PE1 and host2 is connected to PE2
Host1 and PE1 have IPv4/v6 BGP sessions.
PE1 and PE2 gave EVPN session.
Host1 advertises IPv4/v6 prefixes to PE1.
PE1 advertises these prefixes to PE2 as EVPN type-5 routes.
Gateway IP for these EVPN type-5 routes is host1 IP.
Host1 MAC/IP is advertised by PE1 as EVPN type-2 route
Following testcases are covered:
TC_1:
Check BGP and zebra states for above topology at PE1 and PE2.
TC_2:
Stop advertising prefixes from host1. It should withdraw type-5 routes. Check
states at PE1 and PE2
Advertise the prefixes again. Check states.
TC_3:
Shut down VxLAN interface at PE1. This should withdraw type-2 routes. Check
states at PE1 and PE2.
Enable VxLAN interface again. Check states.
Signed-off-by: Ameya Dharkar <adharkar@vmware.com>
FPM sends VNI to the data plane with the EVPN prefix. For pure type-5 EVPN
route, nexthop interface of EVPN prefix is L3VNI SVI. Thus, we encode L3VNI
corresponding to the nexthop vrf with rtmsg for this prefix.
For EVPN type-5 route with gateway IP overlay index, we supporting
asymmetric IRB. Thus, nexthop interface is L2VNI SVI. So, instead of fetching
vrf VNI, fetch VNI corresponding to the nexthop SVI and encode it in the rtmsg
for EVPN prefix.
Signed-off-by: Ameya Dharkar <adharkar@vmware.com>
Gateway IP overlay index of the remote type-5 route is resolved
recursively using remote type-2 route. For the purpose of this
recursive resolution, for each L2VNI, we build a hash table of the
remote IP addresses received by remote type-2 routes.
For the topologies where overlay index resolution is not needed, we
do not need to build this remote-ip-hash.
Thus, make the recursive resolution of the overlay index conditional on
"enable-resolve-overlay-index" configuration.
router bgp 65001
bgp router-id 192.168.100.1
neighbor 10.0.1.2 remote-as 65002
!
address-family l2vpn evpn
neighbor 10.0.1.2 activate
advertise-all-vni
enable-resolve-overlay-index----------> New configuration
exit-address-family
Gateway IP overlay index will be resolved only if this configuration is present.
Signed-off-by: Ameya Dharkar <adharkar@vmware.com>
When EVPN prefix route with a gateway IP overlay index is imported into the IP
vrf at the ingress PE, BGP nexthop of this route is set to the gateway IP.
For this vrf route to be valid, following conditions must be met.
- Gateway IP nexthop of this route should be L3 reachable, i.e., this route
should be resolved in RIB.
- A remote MAC/IP route should be present for the gateway IP address in the
EVI(L2VPN table).
To check for the first condition, gateway IP is registered with nht (nexthop
tracking) to receive the reachability notifications for this IP from zebra RIB.
If the gateway IP is reachable, zebra sends the reachability information (i.e.,
nexthop interface) for the gateway IP.
This nexthop interface should be the SVI interface.
Now, to find out type-2 route corresponding to the gateway IP, we need to fetch
the VNI for the above SVI.
To do this VNI lookup effitiently, define a hashtable of struct bgpevpn with
svi_ifindex as key.
struct hash *vni_svi_hash;
An EVI instance is added to vni_svi_hash if its svi_ifindex is nonzero.
Using this hash, we obtain struct bgpevpn corresponding to the gateway IP.
For gateway IP overlay index recursive lookup, once we find the correct EVI, we
have to lookup its route table for a MAC/IP prefix. As we have to iterate the
entire route table for every lookup, this lookup is expensive. We can optimize
this lookup by adding all the remote IP addresses in a hash table.
Following hash table is defined for this purpose in struct bgpevpn
Struct hash *remote_ip_hash;
When a MAC/IP route is installed in the EVI table, it is also added to
remote_ip_hash.
It is possible to have multiple MAC/IP routes with the same IP address because
of host move scenarios. Thus, for every address addr in remote_ip_hash, we
maintain list of all the MAC/IP routes having addr as their IP address.
Following structure defines an address in remote_ip_hash.
struct evpn_remote_ip {
struct ipaddr addr;
struct list *macip_path_list;
};
A Boolean field is added to struct bgp_nexthop_cache to indicate that the
nexthop is EVPN gateway IP overlay index.
bool is_evpn_gwip_nexthop;
A flag BGP_NEXTHOP_EVPN_INCOMPLETE is added to struct bgp_nexthop_cache.
This flag is set when the gateway IP is L3 reachable but not yet resolved by a
MAC/IP route.
Following table explains the combination of L3 and L2 reachability w.r.t.
BGP_NEXTHOP_VALID and BGP_NEXTHOP_EVPN_INCOMPLETE flags
* | MACIP resolved | MACIP unresolved
*----------------|----------------|------------------
* L3 reachable | VALID = 1 | VALID = 0
* | INCOMPLETE = 0 | INCOMPLETE = 1
* ---------------|----------------|--------------------
* L3 unreachable | VALID = 0 | VALID = 0
* | INCOMPLETE = 0 | INCOMPLETE = 0
Procedure that we use to check if the gateway IP is resolvable by a MAC/IP
route:
- Find the EVI/L2VRF that belongs to the nexthop SVI using vni_svi_hash.
- Check if the gateway IP is present in remote_ip_hash in this EVI.
When the gateway IP is L3 reachable and it is also resolved by a MAC/IP route,
unset BGP_NEXTHOP_EVPN_INCOMPLETE flag and set BGP_NEXTHOP_VALID flag.
Signed-off-by: Ameya Dharkar <adharkar@vmware.com>
SVI ifindex for L2VNI is required in BGP to perform EVPN type-5 to type-2
recusrsive resolution using gateway IP overlay index.
Program this svi_ifindex in struct zebra_vni_t as well as in struct bgpevpn
Changes include:
1. Add svi_if field to struct zebra_evpn_t
2. Add svi_ifindex field to struct bgpevpn
3. When SVI (bridge or VLAN) is bound to a VxLAN interface, store it in the
zebra_evpn_t structure.
4. Add this SVI ifindex to ZEBRA_VNI_ADD
5. Store svi_ifindex in struct bgpevpn
Signed-off-by: Ameya Dharkar <adharkar@vmware.com>
The IP/IPv6 prefix carried with EVPN RT-5 is imported in the BGP vrf according
to the attached route targets.
If the prefix carries a gateway IP overlay index, this gateway IP should be
installed as the nexthop of the route imported in the BGP vrf.
This route in vrf will be marked as VALID only if the nexthop is resolved in the
SVI network.
To receive runtime reachability information for the nexthop, register it with
the nexthop tracking module.
Send this route to zebra after processing.
Signed-off-by: Ameya Dharkar <adharkar@vmware.com>
While installing this route in the EVPN table, make sure all the conditions
mentioned in the draft
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-11 are
met.
Draft mentions following conditions:
- ESI and gateway IP cannot be both nonzero at the same time.
- ESI, gateway IP, RMAC and VNI label all cannot be 0 at the same time.
If the received EVPN RT-5 route does not meet these conditions, the route is
treated as withdraw.
Signed-off-by: Ameya Dharkar <adharkar@vmware.com>
Gateway IP overlay index is generated for EVPN RT-5 when following CLI is
configured.
router bgp 100 vrf vrf-blue
address-family l2vpn evpn
advertise ipv4 unicast gateway-ip
advertise ipv6 unicast gateway-ip
BGP nexthop of the VRF IP/IPv6 route is set as the gateway IP of the
corresponding EVPN RT-5
Signed-off-by: Ameya Dharkar <adharkar@vmware.com>
Adds gateway-ip option to advertise ipv4/ipv6 unicast CLI.
dev(config-router-af)# advertise <ipv4|ipv6> unicast
<cr>
gateway-ip Specify EVPN Overlay Index
route-map route-map for filtering specific routes
When gateway-ip is specified, gateway IP field of EVPN RT-5 NLRI is filled with
the BGP nexthop of the vrf prefix being advertised.
No support for ESI overlay index yet.
Test cases:
1) advertise ipv4 unicast
2) advertise ipv4 unicast gateway-ip
3) advertise ipv6 unicast
4) advertise ipv6 unicast gateway-ip
5) Modify from no-overlay-index to gateway-ip
6) Modify from gateway-ip to no-overlay-index
7) CLI with route-map and modify route-map
Author: Sri Mohana Singamsetty <srimohans@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sri Mohana Singamsetty <srimohans@gmail.com>
- Add following set clause for route-maps
"set evpn gateway-ip <ipv4|ipv6 >A.B.C.D|X:X::X:X"
- When this route-map is applied as outboubd policy in BGP, it will set the
gateway-ip in BGP attribute For EVPN type-5 routes.
Example configuration:
route-map RMAP-EVPN_GWIP permit 5
set evpn gateway-ip ipv4 50.0.2.12
set evpn gateway-ip ipv6 50:0:2::12
router bgp 101
bgp router-id 10.100.0.1
neighbor 10.0.1.2 remote-as 102
!
address-family l2vpn evpn
neighbor 10.0.1.2 activate
neighbor 10.0.1.2 route-map RMAP-EVPN_GWIP out
advertise-all-vni
exit-address-family
Signed-off-by: Ameya Dharkar <adharkar@vmware.com>
To start we use 10k static route config. This test goes along with
recent batching changes it will fail w/o them (b/c some operations w/o
batching take 100 times as long).
This test should be added to over time for other large config
items (e.g., acl, policy, etc)
Signed-off-by: Christian Hopps <chopps@labn.net>
We are inconsistently using peer_establiahed(peer) with
sometimes using `peer->status == Established`. Just Convert
over to using the function for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Fix the following address sanitizer crash when running the command `find`:
ERROR: AddressSanitizer: dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow
WRITE of size 1 at 0x7fff4840fc1d thread T0
0 in print_cmd ../lib/command.c:1541
1 in cmd_find_cmds ../lib/command.c:2364
2 in find ../vtysh/vtysh.c:3732
3 in cmd_execute_command_real ../lib/command.c:995
4 in cmd_execute_command ../lib/command.c:1055
5 in cmd_execute ../lib/command.c:1219
6 in vtysh_execute_func ../vtysh/vtysh.c:486
7 in vtysh_execute ../vtysh/vtysh.c:671
8 in main ../vtysh/vtysh_main.c:721
9 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x270b2)
10 in _start (/usr/bin/vtysh+0x21f64d)
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
BGP configuration changes that imply recomputing the BGP route table
(e.g. modifying route-maps, setting bgp graceful-shutdown) might be a
long time process depending on the size of the BGP table and the
route-map numbers and complexity. For example, setups with full
Internet routes take something like one minute to reprocess all the
prefixes when graceful-shutdown is configured. During this time, a
"show bgp commands" request on vtysh results in blocking the shell until
the soft reconfigure table task is over.
This patch splits bgp_soft_reconfig_table task into thread jobs of 25K
prefixes.
Some tests on a full Internet route setup show that after reconfiguring
route-maps or graceful-shutdown, vtysh is not stucked anymore. We are
now able to request commands like "show bgp summary" after 1 or 2
seconds instead of 30 to 60s.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Test uses staticd which required some C++ header protections.
Additionally, the test also runs in the ubuntu20 docker container as
grpc is supported there by the packaging system.
Signed-off-by: Christian Hopps <chopps@labn.net>
Coverity scan found this issue. The bgp_vrf variable in
ensure_vrf_tovpn_sid() has already been derefed in all paths
at this point in time. No need to check for it existing
at this point.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Currently, passive interface flag is configured from the router node
using "passive-interface IFNAME". There are multiple problems with this
command:
- it is not in line with all other interface-related commands - other
parameters are configured from the interface node using "ip ospf"
prefix
- it is not in line with OSPFv3 - passive flag is configured from the
interface node using "ipv6 ospf6 passive" command
- most importantly, it doesn't work correctly when the interface is in
a different VRF - when using VRF-lite, it incorrectly changes the
vrf_id of the interface and it becomes desynced with the actual state;
when using netns, it creates a new fake interface and configures it
instead of configuring the necessary interface
To fix all the problems, this commit adds a new command to the interface
configuration node - "ip ospf passive". The purpose of the command is
completely the same, but it works correctly in a multi-VRF environment.
The old command is preserved for the backward compatibility, but the
warning is added that it is deprecated because it doesn't work correctly
with VRFs.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
When the VRF node is exited using "exit" or "quit", there's still a VRF
pointer stored in the vty context. If you try to configure some router
related command, it will be applied to the previous VRF instead of the
default VRF. For example:
```
(config)# vrf test
(config-vrf)# ip router-id 1.1.1.1
(config-vrf)# do show run
...
!
vrf test
ip router-id 1.1.1.1
exit-vrf
!
...
(config-vrf)# exit
(config)# ip router-id 2.2.2.2
(config)# do show run
...
!
vrf test
ip router-id 2.2.2.2
exit-vrf
!
...
```
`vrf-exit` works correctly, because it stores a pointer to the default
VRF into the vty context (but weirdly keeping the VRF_NODE instead of
changing it to CONFIG_NODE).
Instead of relying on the behavior of exit function, always use the
default VRF when in CONFIG_NODE.
Another problem is missing `VTY_CHECK_CONTEXT`. If someone deletes the
VRF in which node the user enters the command, then zebra applies the
command to the default VRF instead of throwing an error.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
similarly to what was done for IS-IS in commit 01d43141, combine
the SRGB and SRLB commands for OSPF-SR, so that we can replace
overlapping ranges in one sweep change.
Also allow the range configuration to be stored before SR is enabled.
There is no reason why we should not - in fact that constraint meant
that we were always requesting the default label ranges regardless
of what we actually wanted to use.
Finally, update the topotests now that we do not need to refresh
the SRGB/SRLB/MSD after disabling SR. Note that the prefix-sid still
needs to be re-added.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Di Pascale <emanuele@voltanet.io>
Modify VRF/view display in show bgp summary:
- to be more concise
- to display on which VRF/view no neighbor was found
Before patch:
ubuntu# show bgp vrf all summary
Instance default:
IPv4 Unicast Summary:
BGP router identifier XX.XX.XX.XX, local AS number XXXX vrf-id 0
(...)
IPv6 Unicast Summary:
Instance private:
IPv4 Unicast Summary:
ubuntu# show bgp vrf all ipv4 multicast summary
% No BGP neighbors found
% No BGP neighbors found
After patch:
ubuntu# show bgp vrf all summary
IPv4 Unicast Summary (VRF default):
BGP router identifier XX.XX.XX.XX, local AS number XXXX vrf-id 0
(...)
IPv6 Unicast Summary (VRF default):
(...)
IPv4 Unicast Summary (VRF private):
(...)
ubuntu# show bgp vrf all ipv4 multicast summary
% No BGP neighbors found in VRF default
% No BGP neighbors found in VRF private
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
New OSPFv3 NSSA test:
* When a static route is redistributed to an NSSA router it should be
type 7 and should show up in OSPFv3 route database.
* Test LSA Type 7 and route removal.
Co-authored-by: Soman K.S <somanks@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Patch provided by Soman K.S. with small alterations.
Signed-off-by: Soman K.S <somanks@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
