Moved `show ip rpf A.B.C.D` command here from zebra, deprecated and aliased
to `show ip pim nexthop-lookup`.
Allow group to be optional in the lookup command. Only validate group if
source is ANY. Documented setting source via RP if not provided.
Added new output if ANY source + group lookup is performed and no
RP is found for the group. Updated output to include souce and
group for lookup.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Bahr <nbahr@atcorp.com>
Link up the RPF lookup mode changing to a force update to RP's and
upstreams registered for nexthop lookup cache updates.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Bahr <nbahr@atcorp.com>
Refactor the next hop tracking in PIM to fully support the configured RPF lookup mode.
Moved many NHT related functions to pim_nht.h/c
NHT now tracks both MRIB and URIB tables and makes nexthop decisions based on the configured lookup mode.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Bahr <nbahr@atcorp.com>
Add prefix length in nexthop response.
Apply lookup mode to the sychronous lookups, where we may lookup
the MRIB, URIB, or both and make a decision based on the nexthop.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Bahr <nbahr@atcorp.com>
Add rpf-lookup-mode MODE vty command under router pim block.
Including NB piping and config write. Using the mode still pending.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Bahr <nbahr@atcorp.com>
When debugging a crash I noticed that sometimes we talked about
a zclient connection in relation to the fd associated with it
and sometimes we did not. Let's just always give the data
associated with the fd. It will make it a bit easier for me
to follow the transitions.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Fix Coverity Scan CID 1602463: make it impossible for the function to fail.
Hardcode the multicast prefix generation instead of calling `str2prefix()`
which caused unnecessary memory allocations and returned error values.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
If we have this construct:
for (pi = bgp_dest_get_bgp_path_info(dest); pi; pi = pi->next) {
...
bgp_process();
}
This can induce an infinite loop. This happens because bgp_process
will move the unsorted items to the top of the list for handling,
as such it is necessary to hold the next pointer to the side
to actually look at each possible bgp_path_info.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Remove use of `ip multicast rpf-lookup-mode` from unrelated tests.
Looks like this test was just unlucky enough to pick that command as an
example for use here. Just changed it to something less likely to be
removed in the future.
Update route table output to include AFI SAFI output.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Bahr <nbahr@atcorp.com>
Add `mrib` flag to existing "show ip route" commands which then use
the multicast safi rather than the unicast safi. Updated the vty output
to include the AFI and SAFI string when printing the table.
Deprecate `show ip rpf` command, aliased to `show ip route mrib`.
Removed `show ip rpf A.B.C.D`.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Bahr <nbahr@atcorp.com>
Multicast mode belongs in PIM, so removing it completely from zebra.
Modified `show (ip|ipv6) rpf ADDRESS` to always lookup from SAFI_MULTICAST.
This means this command is now specific to the multicast table and does
not necessarily reflect the PIM RPF lookup, but that should be implemented
in PIM instead.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Bahr <nbahr@atcorp.com>
Modified ZEBRA_NEXTHOP_LOOKUP_MRIB to include the SAFI from which to do the lookup.
This generalizes the API away from MRIB specifically and allows the user to decide how it should do lookups.
Rename ZEBRA_NEXTHOP_LOOKUP_MRIB to ZEBRA_NEXTHOP_LOOKUP now that it is more generalized.
This change is in preperation to remove multicast lookup mode completely from zebra.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Bahr <nbahr@atcorp.com>
If you have a bestpath list that looks something like this:
<local evpn mac route>
<learned from peer out swp60>
<learned from peer out swp57>
And a network event happens that causes the peer out swp60
to not be in an established state, yet we still have the
path_info for the destination for swp60, bestpath
will currently end up with this order:
<learned from peer out swp60>
<local evpn mac route>
<learned from peer out swp57>
This causes the local evpn mac route to be deleted in zebra( Wrong! ).
This is happening because swp60 is skipped in bestpath calculation and
not considered to be a path yet it stays at the front of the list.
Modify bestpath calculation such that when pulling the unsorted_list
together to pull path info's into that list when they are also
not in a established state.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Instead of starting with a fairly high value of retry, let's try with a lower
and increase with a backoff to reach what was a default value (120s).
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Reorganize the MSDP initialization code and configuration writing code
to its appropriated place.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
RFC 4271 recommends this 120 seconds, but most of the implementations use 60.
For a datacenter profile we set it to 10 seconds.
Let's roll with 30 and increase up to the maximum 120.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
When running the bgp_bmp_2 vrf test, peer vrf up/down events from the pre
and post policy are received with a wrong peer distinguisher value.
> {"peer_type": "route distinguisher instance", "policy": "pre-policy",
> "ipv6": true, "peer_ip": "192:168::2", "peer_distinguisher": "0:0",
> "peer_asn": 65502, "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp":
> "2024-10-16 21:59:53.111962", "bmp_log_type": "peer up", "local_ip":
> "192:168::1", "local_port": 179, "remote_port": 50836, "seq": 5}
RFC7854 mentions in 4.2 that if the peer is a "RD Instance Peer", it is
set to the route distinguisher of the particular instance the peer
belongs to.
Fix this by modifying the BMP client, update the peer distinguisher
value by filling the peer distinguisher in the bmp_peerstate function.
> {"peer_type": "route distinguisher instance", "policy": "pre-policy",
> "ipv6": true, "peer_ip": "192:168::2", "peer_distinguisher": "444:1",
> "peer_asn": 65502, "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp":
> "2024-10-16 21:59:53.111962", "bmp_log_type": "peer up", "local_ip":
> "192:168::1", "local_port": 179, "remote_port": 50836, "seq": 5}
Add a test to check that peer_distinguisher value is not 0:0 when an
RD instance is set.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
When running the bgp_bmp_2 vrf test, peer up/down events from the pre
and post policy are received with a wrong peer type value
> {"peer_type": "global instance", "policy": "pre-policy", "ipv6": false,
> "peer_ip": "192.168.0.2", "peer_distinguisher": "0:0", "peer_asn": 65502,
> "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp": "2024-10-16 21:59:53.111962",
> "bmp_log_type": "peer up", "local_ip": "192.168.0.1", "local_port": 179,
> "remote_port": 50710, "seq": 4}
RFC7854 defines RD instance peer type, and later in 4.2 requests that
the peer distinguisher value be set to non zero value when the peer type
is not global. This is the case for peer vrf instances.
Fix this by modifying the BMP client, update the peer type
value by updating the peer type value when sending peer up/down messages.
Add a check in the bgp_bmp_2 test to ensure that peer type is correctly
set.
> {"peer_type": "route distinguisher instance", "policy": "pre-policy",
> "ipv6": true, "peer_ip": "192:168::2", "peer_distinguisher": "0:0",
> "peer_asn": 65502, "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp":
> "2024-10-16 21:59:53.111962", "bmp_log_type": "peer up", "local_ip":
> "192:168::1", "local_port": 179, "remote_port": 50836, "seq": 5}
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
When running the bgp_bmp_2 vrf test, peer route messages from the pre
and post policy are received with a wrong peer distinguisher value.
> {"peer_type": "route distinguisher instance", "policy": "pre-policy", "ipv6": false,
> "peer_ip": "192.168.0.2", "peer_distinguisher": "0:0", "peer_asn": 65502,
> "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp": "2024-10-31 08:19:58.111963",
> "bmp_log_type": "update", "origin": "IGP", "as_path": "65501 65502",
> "bgp_nexthop": "192.168.0.2", "ip_prefix": "172.31.0.15/32", "seq": 15}
RFC7854 mentions in 4.2 that if the peer is a "RD Instance Peer", it is
set to the route distinguisher of the particular instance the peer
belongs to.
Fix this by modifying the BMP client:
- update the peer distinguisher value by unlocking the filling of the peer distinguisher in the function.
This change impacts monitoring messages.
- add the peer distinguisher computation for mirror messages
- modify the bgp_bmp_2 vrf test, update the peer_distinguisher value
> {"peer_type": "route distinguisher instance", "policy": "pre-policy", "ipv6": false,
> "peer_ip": "192.168.0.2", "peer_distinguisher": "444:1", "peer_asn": 65502,
> "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp": "2024-10-31 08:19:58.111963",
> "bmp_log_type": "update", "origin": "IGP", "as_path": "65501 65502",
> "bgp_nexthop": "192.168.0.2", "ip_prefix": "172.31.0.15/32", "seq": 15}
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
When running the bgp_bmp_2 vrf test, peer route messages from the pre
and post policy are received with a wrong peer type value
> {"peer_type": "global instance", "policy": "pre-policy", "ipv6": false,
> "peer_ip": "192.168.0.2", "peer_distinguisher": "0:0", "peer_asn": 65502,
> "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp": "2024-10-31 08:19:58.111963",
> "bmp_log_type": "update", "origin": "IGP", "as_path": "65501 65502",
> "bgp_nexthop": "192.168.0.2", "ip_prefix": "172.31.0.15/32", "seq": 15}
In addition to global instance peers, RFC7854 defines RD instance peers.
This value can be used for peers which are on a BGP VRF instance, for
example with an L3VPN setup.
When configuring a BGP VRF instance, the peer type should be seen as an
RD instance peer.
Fix this by modifying the BMP client:
- update the peer type for vrf mirror and monitoring messages
- modify bgp_bmp_2 vrf test to control the peer_type value
> {"peer_type": "route distinguisher instance", "policy": "pre-policy", "ipv6": false,
> "peer_ip": "192.168.0.2", "peer_distinguisher": "0:0", "peer_asn": 65502,
> "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp": "2024-10-31 08:19:58.111963",
> "bmp_log_type": "update", "origin": "IGP", "as_path": "65501 65502",
> "bgp_nexthop": "192.168.0.2", "ip_prefix": "172.31.0.15/32", "seq": 15}
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
All BMP peer up/down messages send a 0:0 peer distinguisher.
This will not be ok when adding RD instance type.
Add code to get the peer distinguisher value.
- modify the API to pass the BGP instance instead of BMP.
- implement error cases with an unknown vrf identifier or a
peer type with local type value.
- handle the error return of the API; consequently, handle
the bmp_peerstate() error return in the calling functions.
There is no functional change, as the peer type value is
either loc-rib or global, both cases are already handled.
The next commit will handle the RD instance case.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
