bgpd, topotests: bmp, fix wrong peer type for peer up/down events

When running the bgp_bmp_2 vrf test, peer up/down events from the pre
and post policy are received with a wrong peer type value

> {"peer_type": "global instance", "policy": "pre-policy", "ipv6": false,
> "peer_ip": "192.168.0.2", "peer_distinguisher": "0:0", "peer_asn": 65502,
> "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp": "2024-10-16 21:59:53.111962",
> "bmp_log_type": "peer up", "local_ip": "192.168.0.1", "local_port": 179,
> "remote_port": 50710, "seq": 4}

RFC7854 defines RD instance peer type, and later in 4.2 requests that
the peer distinguisher value be set to non zero value when the peer type
is not global. This is the case for peer vrf instances.

Fix this by modifying the BMP client, update the peer type
value by updating the peer type value when sending peer up/down messages.

Add a check in the bgp_bmp_2 test to ensure that peer type is correctly
set.

> {"peer_type": "route distinguisher instance", "policy": "pre-policy",
> "ipv6": true, "peer_ip": "192:168::2", "peer_distinguisher": "0:0",
> "peer_asn": 65502, "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp":
> "2024-10-16 21:59:53.111962", "bmp_log_type": "peer up", "local_ip":
> "192:168::1", "local_port": 179, "remote_port": 50836, "seq": 5}

Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
This commit is contained in:
Philippe Guibert 2024-10-31 09:31:04 +01:00
parent bc3a19e253
commit 188ba91082
3 changed files with 5 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -474,12 +474,6 @@ static struct stream *bmp_peerstate(struct peer *peer, bool down)
peer_type = bmp_get_peer_type(peer);
if (peer_type == BMP_PEER_TYPE_LOC_RIB_INSTANCE)
is_locrib = true;
else
/* TODO: remove this when other RD and local instances supported */
peer_type = BMP_PEER_TYPE_GLOBAL_INSTANCE;
if (is_locrib == false)
peer_type = BMP_PEER_TYPE_GLOBAL_INSTANCE;
if (bmp_get_peer_distinguisher(peer->bgp, AFI_UNSPEC, peer_type, &peer_distinguisher)) {
zlog_warn("skipping bmp message for peer %s: can't get peer distinguisher",

View File

@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ def bmp_check_for_prefixes(
def bmp_check_for_peer_message(
expected_peers, bmp_log_type, bmp_collector, bmp_log_file
expected_peers, bmp_log_type, bmp_collector, bmp_log_file, is_rd_instance=False
):
"""
Check for the presence of a peer up message for the peer
@ -211,6 +211,8 @@ def bmp_check_for_peer_message(
and m["peer_ip"] != "0.0.0.0"
and m["bmp_log_type"] == bmp_log_type
):
if is_rd_instance and m["peer_type"] != "route distinguisher instance":
continue
peers.append(m["peer_ip"])
elif m["policy"] == "loc-rib" and m["bmp_log_type"] == bmp_log_type:
peers.append("0.0.0.0")

View File

@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ def test_peer_up():
"peer up",
tgen.gears["bmp1vrf"],
os.path.join(tgen.logdir, "bmp1vrf", "bmp.log"),
is_rd_instance=True,
)
success, _ = topotest.run_and_expect(test_func, True, count=30, wait=1)
assert success, "Checking the updated prefixes has been failed !."
@ -245,6 +246,7 @@ def test_peer_down():
"peer down",
tgen.gears["bmp1vrf"],
os.path.join(tgen.logdir, "bmp1vrf", "bmp.log"),
is_rd_instance=True,
)
success, _ = topotest.run_and_expect(test_func, True, count=30, wait=1)
assert success, "Checking the updated prefixes has been failed !."