Remove use of `ip multicast rpf-lookup-mode` from unrelated tests.
Looks like this test was just unlucky enough to pick that command as an
example for use here. Just changed it to something less likely to be
removed in the future.
Update route table output to include AFI SAFI output.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Bahr <nbahr@atcorp.com>
When running the bgp_bmp_2 vrf test, peer vrf up/down events from the pre
and post policy are received with a wrong peer distinguisher value.
> {"peer_type": "route distinguisher instance", "policy": "pre-policy",
> "ipv6": true, "peer_ip": "192:168::2", "peer_distinguisher": "0:0",
> "peer_asn": 65502, "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp":
> "2024-10-16 21:59:53.111962", "bmp_log_type": "peer up", "local_ip":
> "192:168::1", "local_port": 179, "remote_port": 50836, "seq": 5}
RFC7854 mentions in 4.2 that if the peer is a "RD Instance Peer", it is
set to the route distinguisher of the particular instance the peer
belongs to.
Fix this by modifying the BMP client, update the peer distinguisher
value by filling the peer distinguisher in the bmp_peerstate function.
> {"peer_type": "route distinguisher instance", "policy": "pre-policy",
> "ipv6": true, "peer_ip": "192:168::2", "peer_distinguisher": "444:1",
> "peer_asn": 65502, "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp":
> "2024-10-16 21:59:53.111962", "bmp_log_type": "peer up", "local_ip":
> "192:168::1", "local_port": 179, "remote_port": 50836, "seq": 5}
Add a test to check that peer_distinguisher value is not 0:0 when an
RD instance is set.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
When running the bgp_bmp_2 vrf test, peer up/down events from the pre
and post policy are received with a wrong peer type value
> {"peer_type": "global instance", "policy": "pre-policy", "ipv6": false,
> "peer_ip": "192.168.0.2", "peer_distinguisher": "0:0", "peer_asn": 65502,
> "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp": "2024-10-16 21:59:53.111962",
> "bmp_log_type": "peer up", "local_ip": "192.168.0.1", "local_port": 179,
> "remote_port": 50710, "seq": 4}
RFC7854 defines RD instance peer type, and later in 4.2 requests that
the peer distinguisher value be set to non zero value when the peer type
is not global. This is the case for peer vrf instances.
Fix this by modifying the BMP client, update the peer type
value by updating the peer type value when sending peer up/down messages.
Add a check in the bgp_bmp_2 test to ensure that peer type is correctly
set.
> {"peer_type": "route distinguisher instance", "policy": "pre-policy",
> "ipv6": true, "peer_ip": "192:168::2", "peer_distinguisher": "0:0",
> "peer_asn": 65502, "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp":
> "2024-10-16 21:59:53.111962", "bmp_log_type": "peer up", "local_ip":
> "192:168::1", "local_port": 179, "remote_port": 50836, "seq": 5}
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
When running the bgp_bmp_2 vrf test, peer route messages from the pre
and post policy are received with a wrong peer distinguisher value.
> {"peer_type": "route distinguisher instance", "policy": "pre-policy", "ipv6": false,
> "peer_ip": "192.168.0.2", "peer_distinguisher": "0:0", "peer_asn": 65502,
> "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp": "2024-10-31 08:19:58.111963",
> "bmp_log_type": "update", "origin": "IGP", "as_path": "65501 65502",
> "bgp_nexthop": "192.168.0.2", "ip_prefix": "172.31.0.15/32", "seq": 15}
RFC7854 mentions in 4.2 that if the peer is a "RD Instance Peer", it is
set to the route distinguisher of the particular instance the peer
belongs to.
Fix this by modifying the BMP client:
- update the peer distinguisher value by unlocking the filling of the peer distinguisher in the function.
This change impacts monitoring messages.
- add the peer distinguisher computation for mirror messages
- modify the bgp_bmp_2 vrf test, update the peer_distinguisher value
> {"peer_type": "route distinguisher instance", "policy": "pre-policy", "ipv6": false,
> "peer_ip": "192.168.0.2", "peer_distinguisher": "444:1", "peer_asn": 65502,
> "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp": "2024-10-31 08:19:58.111963",
> "bmp_log_type": "update", "origin": "IGP", "as_path": "65501 65502",
> "bgp_nexthop": "192.168.0.2", "ip_prefix": "172.31.0.15/32", "seq": 15}
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
When running the bgp_bmp_2 vrf test, peer route messages from the pre
and post policy are received with a wrong peer type value
> {"peer_type": "global instance", "policy": "pre-policy", "ipv6": false,
> "peer_ip": "192.168.0.2", "peer_distinguisher": "0:0", "peer_asn": 65502,
> "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp": "2024-10-31 08:19:58.111963",
> "bmp_log_type": "update", "origin": "IGP", "as_path": "65501 65502",
> "bgp_nexthop": "192.168.0.2", "ip_prefix": "172.31.0.15/32", "seq": 15}
In addition to global instance peers, RFC7854 defines RD instance peers.
This value can be used for peers which are on a BGP VRF instance, for
example with an L3VPN setup.
When configuring a BGP VRF instance, the peer type should be seen as an
RD instance peer.
Fix this by modifying the BMP client:
- update the peer type for vrf mirror and monitoring messages
- modify bgp_bmp_2 vrf test to control the peer_type value
> {"peer_type": "route distinguisher instance", "policy": "pre-policy", "ipv6": false,
> "peer_ip": "192.168.0.2", "peer_distinguisher": "0:0", "peer_asn": 65502,
> "peer_bgp_id": "192.168.0.2", "timestamp": "2024-10-31 08:19:58.111963",
> "bmp_log_type": "update", "origin": "IGP", "as_path": "65501 65502",
> "bgp_nexthop": "192.168.0.2", "ip_prefix": "172.31.0.15/32", "seq": 15}
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
The BMP implementation currently only supports global and
loc-rib instance types. When loc-rib is selected, the
peer_distinguisher is set to the route distinguisher of
the L3VRF where the BGP instance is. This functionality has
not been tested until now, because the peer distinguisher
value had been explicitly omitted in the bmp messages.
Expose the peer distinguisher value in all BMP messages
received. This change requires to modify the expected output
for loc-rib when the BGP instance is in a L3VRF.
The handling of peer distinguisher value for RD instances
will follow in the next commits.
Link: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7854.html#section-4.2
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Add simple test to show filtering of IGMP joins using new "ip multicast
boundary" filtering with access-lists, include test of existing prefix-
list based "ip multicast boundary oil" command.
Signed-off-by: Corey Siltala <csiltala@atcorp.com>
For those tests using exabgp convert them all to use `neighbor X timers
connect 1`. I have noticed that occassionally when looking at the
support files for tests run that peers are in a wait period for
reconnecting which is longer than the test is waiting to converge.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Some temporary files are hardwritten in /tmp folder. Use the bmp log
folder instead. Replace the bmp log file argument with bmp log folder.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
DEBUG_PCAP can be set True to manually enable pcap debugging when
running bmp tests.
Save bmp pcap in logdir (ie. /tmp/topotests/bgp_bmp.bgp_bmp_X/ instead
of /tmp.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Multiple BMP tests can run in parallel but, when one instance ends,
it kills the BMP server process of all BMP tests.
Save the PID of a BMP server and only kill it at the end.
Link: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/17465
Fixes: 875511c466 ("topotests: add basic bmp collector")
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
When configuring the bgp_bmp test with an additional
peer that sends empty AS-PATH, the bmp collector is stopping:
> [2024-10-28 17:41:51] Finished dissecting data from ('192.0.2.1', 33922)
> [2024-10-28 17:41:52] Data received from ('192.0.2.1', 33922): length 195
> [2024-10-28 17:41:52] Got message type: <class 'bmp.BMPRouteMonitoring'>
> [2024-10-28 17:41:52] unpack_from requires a buffer of at least 2 bytes for unpacking 2 bytes at offset 0 (actual buffer size is 0)
> [2024-10-28 17:41:52] TCP session closed with ('192.0.2.1', 33922)
> [2024-10-28 17:41:52] Server shutting down on 192.0.2.10:1789
The parser attempts to read an empty AS-path and considers the length
value as a length in bytes, whereas RFC mentions this value as
definining the number of AS-PAths. Fix this in the parser.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
The bgp_bmp and bgp_bmp_vrf tests use similar routines
to test the bmp, but are duplicates. Gather the bgp_bmp
and the bgp_bmp_vrf tests in a single bgp_bmp folder.
- Create a bgpbmp.py library under the bgp_bmp test folder
- The bgp_bmp and bgp_bmp_vrf test are renamed to bgp_bmp_1
and bgp_bmp_2 test.
- Maintain separate folder for config and output results. Adapt
the bgp_bmp library accordingly.
- The json output for bgp_bmp_2 test has no referenc to hostame.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Cleanup usage of log file into /tmp. Remove usage of
debugs that will slow down test and remove password.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Use the advertise route-map command, and check that it
filters out correctly the undesirable prefixes. Reversely,
check that undoing that route-map recovers all prefixes.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Rework the test file by adding test methods.
Add a convergence test that checks for the incoming BGP prefixes.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
