When using bfd in remote-dataplane client mode, don't close
a new client socket if we're going to try to use it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@cisco.com>
(cherry picked from commit f511530788)
If we receive an IPv6 prefix e.g.: 2001:db8:100::/64 with nextop: 0.0.0.0, and
mp_nexthop: fc00::2, we should not treat this with an invalid nexthop because
of 0.0.0.0. We MUST check for MP_REACH attribute also and decide later if we
have at least one a valid nexthop.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
(cherry picked from commit a0d2734e87)
In cases such as 'no advertise-all-vni' and L2 VNI DELETE, we need to
pop all the VPN routes present in the bgp_zebra_announce FIFO yet to
be processed regardless of VNI is configured or not.
NOTE: NO need to pop the VPN routes in two cases
1) In free_vni_entry
- Called by bgp_free()->bgp_evpn_cleanup().
- Since bgp_delete is called before bgp_free and we pop all the dest
pertaining to bgp under delete.
2) evpn_delete_vni() when user configures "no vni" since the withdraw
of all routes happen in normal cycle.
Fixes: a07df6f754
("bgpd : backpressure - Handle BGP-Zebra(EPVN) Install evt Creation")
Ticket :#4163611
Signed-off-by: Rajasekar Raja <rajasekarr@nvidia.com>
(cherry picked from commit 898852f269)
While populating the nexthop info for "show bgp nexthop json", resolvedPrefix
is added in parent json object instead of json_nexthop object.
This results in displaying wrong resolvedPrefix for nexthops.
Fixing the same by adding resolvedPrefix to json_nexthop object, so that
the proper resolvedPrefix would be displayed for the respective nexthop
Signed-off-by: Krishnasamy R <krishnasamyr@nvidia.com>
(cherry picked from commit 95c08e082c)
A redistribute cmd can have a route-map attached to it and adding the
match source-protocol to that route-map means BGP to filter which
protocol routes to accept among the bunch of routes zebra is sending.
Fixing this since this wasnt implemented earlier.
Ticket :#4119692
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajasekar Raja <rajasekarr@nvidia.com>
(cherry picked from commit 68358c0f92)
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Without this patch we set only the first path for the route (if multiple exist)
as LLGR stale and stop doing that for the rest of the paths, which is wrong.
Fixes: 1479ed2fb3 ("bgpd: Implement LLGR helper mode")
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
We iterated over all bgp_path_info's, but once we remove the path, we didn't
check for other paths under the same bgp_dest.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
If we set router-id, e.g. `router-id x.x.x.x`, then we have:
```
pc.donatas.net# show ip ospf | include Router ID
OSPF Routing Process, Router ID: x.x.x.x
```
But once we remove it (`no router-id x.x.x.x`), the old router-id remains.
This is kinda OK, but to be consistent with OSPFv3 we should use what Zebra
already has, instead of retaining the old one.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1073e0f9b3)
A new command is `ospf router-id ...`, but the old one is also valid. Just a no
form was missed.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
(cherry picked from commit 80bfe6784f)
Before this patch, if we set something like:
```
bgp extcommunity-list expanded 1234 permit admin
```
In running config we have:
```
bgp extcommunity-list 1234 seq 5 permit admin
```
That leads to incorrect rendering, even more the line can't be deleted.
With this fix we treat numbered community-list only if it's inside the range
1-500, otherwise it's a non-numbered clist.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4c1ee29116)
The algorithm number is encoded on 8 bits and does not require
an unsigned 32 bit value to store the value.
Fixes: cc4926c128 ("isisd,yang: add algorithm-prefix-sid configuration tree")
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8e861a75e8)
When receiving a hello packet, if the neighbor state transitions directly from a non-ISIS_ADJ_UP state (such as ISIS_ADJ_INITIALIZING) to ISIS_ADJ_DOWN state, the neighbor entry cannot be deleted. If the neighbor is removed or the neighbor's System ID changes, it may result in memory leakage in the neighbor entry.
Test Scenario:
LAN link between Router A and Router B is established. Router A does not configure neighbor authentication, while Router B is configured with neighbor authentication. When the neighbor entry on Router B ages out, the neighbor state on Router A transitions to INIT. If Router B is then removed, the neighbor state on Router A transitions to DOWN and persists.
Signed-off-by: zhou-run <166502045+zhou-run@users.noreply.github.com>
fix frrbot styling issues found.
fix frrbot styling issues found.
Signed-off-by: zhou-run <166502045+zhou-run@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5009f7539a)
we have
(gdb) p *path->attr->aspath
$1 = {refcnt = 3, segments = 0x0, json = 0x0, str = 0x55723d0b7470 "", str_len = 0, asnotation = ASNOTATION_PLAIN}
It looks like this aspath is empty, resulting in a size 0 and NULL pointer for path->attr->aspath->segments which leads to the SIGSEGV
fixe: return 0 when segments is null.
Signed-off-by: Francois Dumontet <francois.dumontet@6wind.com>
(cherry picked from commit ee2f1b85cf)
Introduce a command to stop bgpd from enabling IPv6 router advertisement
messages sending on interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Sokolovskiy <sokolmish@gmail.com>
Fix the display of the local label in show bgp.
> r1# show bgp ipv4 labeled-unicast 172.16.2.2/32
> BGP routing table entry for 172.16.2.2/32, version 2
> Local label: 16 <---- MISSING
> Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default, vrf (null))
> Advertised to non peer-group peers:
> 192.168.1.2
> 65501
> 192.168.1.2 from 192.168.1.2 (172.16.2.2)
> Origin IGP, metric 0, valid, external, best (First path received)
> Remote label: 3
> Last update: Fri Oct 25 17:55:45 2024
Fixes: 67f67ba481 ("bgpd: Drop label_ntop/label_pton functions")
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
(cherry picked from commit e7b3276ace)
For consistency between RIB and BGP, the aigp comparison should
be made after the local route check in bgp bestpath selection.
Signed-off-by: Enke Chen <enchen@paloaltonetworks.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6a7049aaac)
This only matters to single hop nodes that are adjacent to the bsr. More common
with IPv6 where LL address is used in PIM as the primary address. If the BSR IP
happens to be an address on the same interface, the receiving pim router
rejects the BSR address because it expects the BSR IP to resolve via the LL address
even if we have a connected route for the same BSR IP subnet. Effectively, we want to
allow rpf to be resolved via secondary IPs with connected routes on the same interface,
and not limit them to primary addresses.
Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
Include SID structure information when removing an SRv6 End.DT4 or End.DT6 SID
from the forwarding plane.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <cscarpit@cisco.com>
Include SID structure information when installing an SRv6 End.DT6 or End.DT4 SID
in the forwarding plane.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <cscarpit@cisco.com>
OAD is treated as an _internal_ BGP peer, and some of the rules (including BGP
attributes) can be relaxed.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
(cherry picked from commit e63b1520f1)
The value of 0 is accepted from peers, and can also be set by the
route-map "set aigp-metric igp-metric". For coonsistency, it should
be allowed in "set aigp-metric <value>" as well.
Signed-off-by: Enke Chen <enchen@paloaltonetworks.com>
(cherry picked from commit e07f38a43f)
