This test uses the connected ipv4 mapped ipv6 prefix
to resolve the received BGP routes.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: François Dumontet <francois.dumontet@6wind.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4d7df91752)
adding a tests about:
"no bgp as-path access-list" command.
the folloxing "clear bgp *" command leads to the
crash exhibited above.
a sleep had been added to capture the crash befor the end of scenario.
50 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: No such file or directory.
[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f5f05cbb9c0 (LWP 1371086))]
(gdb) bt
context=0x7ffcf2c216c0) at lib/sigevent.c:248
acl_list=0x55c976ec03c0) at bgpd/bgp_aspath.c:1688
dummy=0x7ffcf2c22340, object=0x7ffcf2c21e70) at bgpd/bgp_routemap.c:2401
match_object=0x7ffcf2c21e70, set_object=0x7ffcf2c21e70, pref=0x0)
at lib/routemap.c:2687
attr=0x7ffcf2c220b0, afi=AFI_IP, safi=SAFI_UNICAST, rmap_name=0x0, label=0x0,
num_labels=0, dest=0x55c976ebeaf0) at bgpd/bgp_route.c:1807
addpath_id=0, attr=0x7ffcf2c22450, afi=AFI_IP, safi=SAFI_UNICAST, type=10,
sub_type=0, prd=0x0, label=0x0, num_labels=0, soft_reconfig=0, evpn=0x0)
at bgpd/bgp_route.c:4424
packet=0x7ffcf2c22410) at bgpd/bgp_route.c:6266
packet=0x7ffcf2c22410, mp_withdraw=false) at bgpd/bgp_packet.c:341
peer=0x55c976e89ed0, size=43) at bgpd/bgp_packet.c:2414
at bgpd/bgp_packet.c:3899
Signed-off-by: Francois Dumontet <francois.dumontet@6wind.com>
(cherry picked from commit 324fa21015)
Ensure that 0.0.0.0/1 route can be advertised along with
default-originate.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4538247c99)
The OSPF TE topotest is using switches to interconnect router. During the test,
interfaces are shutdown on some routers to simulate link failure and check that
the TED is correctly updated. However, the switche between router avoid the
detection by the neighbor router that the interface is down i.e. the interface
line remains up as it is conneted to the switch and not to the router.
This patch update the tested topology by removing the switch and connect
directly the router excepted the inter AS link on R3. Interface are also
renamed accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
(cherry picked from commit 55ad785753)
Add a simple test case to ensure that the noprefixroute
code stays working in the future.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0d5c5472c9)
Test setting a wrong bfd source and restore the source auto parameter.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
(cherry picked from commit 94640da234)
Redispatch tests in bfd_topo3 in order to prepare next commit.
Cosmetic change.
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8f5bf65f26)
Just to make sure we don't crash bgpd with double-free if an existing route
already exists.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8eba97d395)
If we send capabilities immediately, before receiving an UPDATE message, we end up
with a notification received from the neighbor. Let's wait until we have the fully
converged topology and do the stuff.
Tested locally and can't replicate the failure, let's see how happy is the CI this time.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
If we modify the prefix-list that is used to define the routes to be
advertised, all of them MUST be advertised.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3c94151258)
Don't hard-code a sharpd nhg id: those values aren't stable
if the daemons/protos/route-types change. Use json show output
to find the id in the 'resilient' nhg test case in
the all_protocol_startup suite.
Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mjs@labn.net>
Add a topotest to check for proper functioning of the
bgp large community list match operation under a route-map.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
There is no match mechanism to match one community from the
incoming community-list. Add the 'any' keyword to the 'match
route-map' command of communit-list and large-community-list.
> match community-list AAA any
> match large-community-list AAA any
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Fix the following warning:
tests/topotests/bgp_srv6l3vpn_sid/test_bgp_srv6l3vpn_sid.py:42
/media/SharedUTM/workspace/frr/tests/topotests/bgp_srv6l3vpn_sid/test_bgp_srv6l3vpn_sid.py:42: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence '\ '
In test_bgp_srv6l3vpn_sid.py we have a comment containing some '\'
characters. Python mistakenly tries to interpret such "\" characters
as escape sequences, which leads to the above warning.
Let's tell Python to treat the comment as a raw string,
so that it simply treats backslashes as literal characters rather than
escape sequences.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <cscarpit@cisco.com>
Issue: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/14057
Fix: Added some sleep to make sure prune is received before
RP is changed.
Signed-off-by: Kuldeep Kashyap <kashyapk@vmware.com>
Issue: Sometimes BGP neighbors are not up before doing any PIM
operation, that is causing some tests failures.
https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/14441
Fix: Added BGP convergence for all tests where BGP is used to make
sure all BGP neigbhors
Signed-off-by: Kuldeep Kashyap <kashyapk@vmware.com>
currently snmpwalk give results such :
BGP4V2-MIB::bgp4V2PeerRemoteAddrType.1.ipv6z.10.125.0.2 = INTEGER: ipv4(1)
BGP4V2-MIB::bgp4V2PeerRemoteAddrType.2.dns.253.0.1.37.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.3 = INTEGER: ipv6(2)
BGP4V2-MIB::bgp4V2PeerRemoteAddr.1.ipv6z.10.125.0.2 = Hex-STRING: 0A 7D 00 02
BGP4V2-MIB::bgp4V2PeerRemoteAddr.2.dns.253.0.1.37.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.3 = Hex-STRING: FD 00 01 25 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 03
the expected result is the following
BGP4V2-MIB::bgp4V2PeerRemoteAddrType.1.ipv4.10.125.0.2 = INTEGER: ipv4(1)
BGP4V2-MIB::bgp4V2PeerRemoteAddrType.1.ipv6.253.0.1.37.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.3 =
INTEGER: ipv6(2)
BGP4V2-MIB::bgp4V2PeerRemoteAddr.1.ipv4.10.125.0.2 = Hex-STRING: 0A 7D 00 02
BGP4V2-MIB::bgp4V2PeerRemoteAddr.1.ipv6.253.0.1.37.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.3 = Hex
-STRING: FD 00 01 25 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 03
in draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-11
INDEX for Bgp4V2PeerEntry is define as follows
INDEX {
bgp4V2PeerInstance,
bgp4V2PeerRemoteAddrType,
bgp4V2PeerRemoteAddr
}
the peer instance is defined as follows
OBJECT bgp4V2PeerInstance
SYNTAX Unsigned32 (1..4294967295)
more this interpretation is conformant with the snmpwalk implementation
for instance we obtain the following result
swBgp.bgp4V2.bgp4V2Objects.bgp4V2PeerTable.bgp4V2PeerEntry.bgp4V2PeerRemotePort.1.ipv6.253.0.1.37.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.3 = Gauge32: 179
swBgp.bgp4V2.bgp4V2Objects.bgp4V2PeerTable.bgp4V2PeerEntry.bgp4V2PeerRemoteAs.1.ipv4.10.125.0.2 = Gauge32: 65200
since currently we are not supporting multi instance for bgp peer in
SNMP the bgp4V2PeerInstance value is set to 1 coforming to:
"Implementations that do not support multiple routing instances should return 1 for this object."
test is updated accordingly to fix.
currently index for bgp4V2NlriEntry is not coformant to MIB definition
Signed-off-by: Francois Dumontet <francois.dumontet@6wind.com>
