1) Do not explicitly set the thread pointer to NULL.
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
2) Fix mixup of `struct eigrp_interface` and `struct eigrp`
usage of the same thread pointer.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Do not explicitly set the thread pointer to NULL.
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
1) Remove `struct thread *` pointers that are never used
2) Do not explicitly set the thread pointer to NULL.
FRR should only ever use the appropriate THREAD_ON/THREAD_OFF
semantics. This is espacially true for the functions we
end up calling the thread for.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
With v6 interface based peering, we send the global as well as the LL address
as nexthops to the peer. When either of these were removed on the interface
we were not necessarily resetting the connection. Leaving bgp in a state
where the peer had reachability for addresses that are no longer in use.
Modify the code that when we receive an interface address deletion
event. Check to see that we are using the v6 address as nexthops
for that peer and if so, tell it to reset.
I initially struggled with a hard reset of the peer or a clear but
choose to follow other places in the code that we noticed address
changes that resulted in hard resets.
Ticket: #2799568
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Problem Statement:
==================
On new neighbor addition, the tx counter for hello msg is reset.
Fix:
=================
Do not reset the tx counter on new neighbor addition.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
Problem Statement:
==================
pim maintains two counters hello tx and hello rx at interface level.
At present pim needs to send the hello message prior to other pim
message as per RFC. This logic is getting derived from the tx hello
counters. So when a new neighbor is added, tx counters are set to
zero and then based on this, it is further decided to send hello in
pim_hello_require function.
Fix:
====
Separating the hello statistics and the logic to decide when to send hello
based on a new flag. pim_ifstat_hello_sent will be used to note down
the hello stats while a new flag is added to decide whether to send hello
or not if it is the first packet to a neighbor.
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
Description:
As per the RFC 3623 section 3.2,
OSPF nbr shouldn't be deleted even in unsuccessful helper exit.
1. Made the changes to keep neighbour even after exit.
2. Restart the dead timer after expiry in helper. Otherwise, Restarter
will be in FULL state in helper forever until it receives the 'hello'.
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Girada <rgirada@vmware.com>
The '... json detail' output is missing some data that's shown
via the 'route_vty_out_detail_header' function. Integrate the
json version of that function in the 'json detail' path.
Signed-off-by: Mark Stapp <mstapp@nvidia.com>
When a regular access-list is updated, we should update references to
regular access-lists, not as-path access-lists.
Fixes#9707.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Problem Statement:
Multiple struct compare using memcmp, which might result in issue due to
structure padding/alignment.
Fix:
The code changes involve structure member by member comparison to
remove any issues related to padding/alignment.
Signed-off-by: Manoj Naragund <mnaragund@vmware.com>
(cherry picked from commit 67db821a1d6d68b19862d50b68ed19278c5f2422)
There's a helper function to check whether the interface is loopback or
VRF - if_is_loopback_or_vrf. Let's use it whenever we need to check that.
There's no functional change in this commit.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Since there's very few locations where the `frr-format` actually prints
false positive warnings, consensus seems to be to just work around the
false positives even if the code is correct.
In fact, there is only one pattern of false positives currently, in
`bfdd/dplane.c` which does `vty_out("%"PRIu64, (uint64_t)be64toh(...))`.
The workaround/fix for this is a replacement `be64toh` whose type is
always `uint64_t` regardless of what OS we're on, making the cast
unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
The existing logic was not comparing the prefix of the extended
prefix TLV. As a result, the code was removing all of the prefix
SIDs except the one received on every LSA update.
Signed-off-by: Fredi Raspall <fredi@voltanet.io>
In update_ext_prefix_sid(), the sr_prefix is associated to the
SR node and inherits the adv router ID regardless.
Signed-off-by: Fredi Raspall <fredi@voltanet.io>
The code was not checking if in these label ranges [a,b], a is
smaller than b, which is assumed in several places, including when
determining the size of the block as b-a+1. As a consequence, the
results of a bad configuration can be unpredictable. Some effects
observed were: 1) segfault 2) de-activation of SR due to label
reservation failure.
The added validation function also checks if the SR blocks are
larger than some minimal size. RFC 8665 mandates that the blocks
be srictly larger than zero. In this patch, the minimum sized is
arbitrarily defined to be 16.
Checking if ranges would fall outside [16,1048575] is omitted
since the vty filtering takes care of that.
Signed-off-by: Fredi Raspall <fredi@voltanet.io>
The prior condition was wrong since it ended up allowing for
labels past the end of the SRLB. Variable 'current' should be in
range [0, size-1] for labels not to exceed the SRLB upper boundary.
In addition, emit a warning log when all labels in the SRLB have
been used.
Signed-off-by: Fredi Raspall <fredi@voltanet.io>
Replaces several complex if conditions by a lookup to a utility
to determine if two ranges of numbers overlap.
Signed-off-by: Fredi Raspall <fredi@voltanet.io>
Homogenize the code dealing with SRGBs and SRLBs by defining the
same set of utility functions for their reservation.
Unify also the logs and don't display function names since the
operations are only performed from the same functions.
Signed-off-by: Fredi Raspall <fredi@voltanet.io>
Homogenize the code dealing with SRGBs and SRLBs by defining the
same set of utility functions for the deletion of SR blocks.
Signed-off-by: Fredi Raspall <fredi@voltanet.io>
