Change the show running commands for bsm and vxlan pimv4 and pimv6
debug commands based on the address family.
Including bsm and vxlan in no debug pimv6 debug.
Signed-off-by: Sai Gomathi N <nsaigomathi@vmware.com>
In CSPF topo test, valgrind detects uninitialized bytes when exporting TE
Opaque information through ZEBRA. This is due to C pragma compilation directive
__attribute__(aligned(8)) in struct ls_node_id in link_state.h. Valgrind
consideris that struct ls_node_id nid = {} doesn't initialized the padding
bytes introduced by gcc.
This patch simply removes the C pragma compilation directive and also takes
opportunity to remove the transmission of remote node id for vertices and
subnets which is not known. Indeed, remote node id is only pertinent for
edges.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
The bgp_path_info_to_ipv6_nexthop will correctly set
the nexthop value. There is no need to test this to
display something that won't be used in debug
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This test is sometimes failing when it looks at the
v6 routes in the fib. Since the step before is
ensuring that v3 ospf has just converged let's
give it a bit of time to find and see if things
have had a chance to install the routes too.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This test directory takes almost 7 minutes to complete splitting
this up into 3 test files drops it down to just over 3 minutes.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
fixes the recent support bmp monitor of VPNv4 afi/safi
the bmp updates messages (MP_REACH_NLRI) are never sent for VPNv4 and bmp withdraws (MP_UNREACH_NRLI) are sent instead
this is caused by bgp_node_lookup which fails to find VPNv4 bgp_node in the rib which results in NULL path info attributes passed to bmp_monitor
using bgp_afi_node_lookup instead of bgp_node_lookup solves the problem
Signed-off-by: Maxence Younsi <mx.yns@outlook.fr>
Updated /doc/topotests.rst with socat details,
which is needed to run PIMv6 tests. Socat tool
is used to send PIMv6 join and traffic.
Signed-off-by: Kuldeep Kashyap <kashyapk@vmware.com>
Allow the same group/source route to be configured on more than one interface.
Currently FRR doesn't allow adding the same mroute on different input interfaces.
Current behavior, if we have the following config:
```
interface eth1
ip mroute eth0 239.0.0.1
interface eth2
ip mroute eth0 239.0.0.1
```
Only one multicast route will be installed with an input interface of the last
interface configured.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Bahr <nbahr@atcorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jafar Al-Gharaibeh <jafar@atcorp.com>
Topology:
R1(LHR) ---- R2 ----R4(FHR)
---- R3 ----
R2 = RP
Steps to reproduce:
1. R1(LHR) sends IGMP join, R4(FHR) sends multicast traffic.
Verify traffic is flowing from FHR to LHR.
2. Restart R1(LHR).
3. Below sequence of events are happening after FRR restart in R1(LHR).
4. R1(LHR) Register RP address to Zebra.
5. R1(LHR) Receive update from Zebra that R2(RP) is reachable via R3.
6. R1(LHR) Receive IGMP join for group 225.1.1.1, will create pim upstream
and (*,G) mroute with IIF towards R3.
7. R1(LHR) Receive update from Zebra that RP is reachable via R2(RP).
8. R1(LHR) Update the PIM upstream IIF, but not updating the (*,G) IIF
even there is RPF change.
9. R1(LHR) receives IGMP join for group 225.1.1.2, will create (*,G) with
IIF towards R2(RP), both upstream and (,G) created with IIF towards R2(RP).
Root Cause:
Mroute IIF is not getting updated when better route update
received. It is still pointing to the older nexthop.
Fix:
Update the mroute IIF when there is change in nexthop.
Fixing Issue #11675
Signed-off-by: Sarita Patra <saritap@vmware.com>
In ospf_handle_exnl_lsa_lsId_chg there is a code path
where that we may be using uninitialized data for decisions.
Doubtful that this happens but let's make it less likely to
even more.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
When using bgp_vty_afi_from_str it can
return AFI_MAX( but in practice never will with
our cli ). In bgp_default_afi_safi_cmd the code
directly references:
bgp->default_afi[afi][safi] = TRUE;
and if afi is AFI_MAX FRRR would be accessing
memory where it should not be.
Let's just provide some assurances for coverity
that this never happens.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
