In bgp_show_table_rd(), the is_last argument is determined using the
expression "next == NULL" to check if the RD table is the last one. This
helps ensure proper JSON formatting.
However, if next is not NULL but is no longer associated with a BGP
table, the JSON output becomes malformed.
Updates the condition to also verify the existence of the next bgp_dest
table.
Fixes: 1ae44dfcba ("bgpd: unify 'show bgp' with RD with normal unicast bgp show")
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
According to the YANG specification, the revision statements should be
ordered with the most recent revision first
Signed-off-by: y-bharath14 <y.bharath@samsung.com>
Currently when the fpm_listener attempts to read say X
bytes it may only get Y( which is less than X ). In this
case we should assume that the dplane_fpm_nl code is just
being slow, as that we know it is possible for it to send
a partial fpm message. Let's just loosen the constraints
a bit and allow data to flow.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Make it consistent and call it `event` when formatting something to
display. Much less confusing for some user seeing it too, since threads
aren't involved.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
FRR's event loop prints a warning if a timer is executed more than some
given threshold late, default being 4s. Set a more appropriate
threshold for BFD TX timers (half TX interval).
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Refactor the "timer getting executed too late" warning:
- warning threshold is now adjustable
- check is performed when event actually executes, rather than when it's
thrown on ready list
- ignore_late_timer replaced with threshold = 0
- system load averages printed in log message
- warning ratelimited to once per 10s rather than once per poll()
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Sometimes, NHRP receives L2 information on a cache entry with the
0.0.0.0 IP address. NHRP considers it as valid and updates the binding
with the new IP address.
> Feb 09 20:09:54 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 162.251.180.10 nud 0x2 cache used 0 type 4
> Feb 09 20:10:35 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 162.251.180.10 nud 0x4 cache used 1 type 4
> Feb 09 20:10:48 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: del-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 162.251.180.10 nud 0x4 cache used 1 type 4
> Feb 09 20:10:49 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: who-has 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr (unspec) nud 0x1 cache used 1 type 4
> Feb 09 20:10:49 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QVXNM-NVHEQ] Netlink: update binding for 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 from c 162.251.180.10 peer.vc.nbma 162.251.180.10 to lladdr (unspec)
> Feb 09 20:10:49 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 0.0.0.0 nud 0x2 cache used 1 type 4
> Feb 09 20:11:30 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 0.0.0.0 nud 0x4 cache used 1 type 4
Actually, the 0.0.0.0 IP addressed mentiones in the 'who-has' message is
wrong because the nud state value means that value is incomplete and
should not be handled as a valid entry. Instead of considering it, fix
this by by invalidating the current binding. This step is necessary in
order to permit NHRP to trigger resolution requests again.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
The transmitted AS value in te tx open message of the peer up loc-rib
message is set to 0. Actually, it should reflect the AS value of the
current BGP instance.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
When forging BMP open message, the BGP router-id of tx open message of
the BMP LOC-RIB peer up message is always set to 0.0.0.0, whatever the
configured value of 'bgp router-id'.
Actually, when forging a peer up LOC-RIB message, the BGP router-id
value should be taken from the main BGP instance, and not from the peer
bgp identifier. Fix this by refreshing the router-id whenever a peer up
loc-rib message should be sent.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Remove the num_labels variable, the received bgp_update() and
bgp_withdraw() function will read the message as including one
label or vni value.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
In bgp route leak, when import vrf x is executed,
it creates bgp instance as hidden with asn value as unspecified.
When router bgp x is configured ensure the correct as,
asnotation is applied otherwise running config shows asn value as 0.
This can lead to frr-reload failure when any FRR config change.
Fix:
Move asn and asnotiation, as_pretty value in common done section,
so when bgp_create gets existing instance but before returning
update asn and required fields in common section.
In bgp_create(): when returning for hidden at least update asn
and required when bgp instance created implicitly due to vrf leak.
if (hidden) {
bgp = bgp_old;
goto peer_init; <<<
}
Before fix:
show running:
router bgp 0 vrf purple
bgp router-id 10.10.3.11
!
address-family ipv4 unicast
redistribute static
import vrf blue
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv6 unicast
import vrf blue
exit-address-family
!
address-family l2vpn evpn
advertise ipv4 unicast
advertise ipv6 unicast
exit-address-family
exit
Testing:
1) following snippet config:
router bgp 63420 vrf blue
import vrf purple
router bgp 63420 vrf purple
import vrf blue
2) restart frr leads to the running config with 0 asn value.
Signed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@nvidia.com>
When SRv6 is enabled and an SRv6 locator is specified in the BGP
configuration, BGP may attempt to request SRv6 locator information from
zebra before the connection is fully established. If this occurs, the
request fails with the following error:
```
2025/02/06 16:37:32 BGP: [HR66R-TWQYD][EC 100663302] srv6_manager_get_locator: invalid zclient socket
````
As a result, BGP is unable to obtain the locator information,
preventing SRv6 VPN from working.
This commit fixes the issue by ensuring BGP requests SRv6 locator
information once the connection with zebra is successfully established.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <cscarpit@cisco.com>
Capability's length is 0 and this is not needed to check if it's multiplied by
X or there is a minimum length for that.
Fixes: db853cc97e ("bgpd: Implement Link-Local Next Hop capability")
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Blocking all signals on non-main threads is not the way to go, at least
the handlers for SIGSEGV, SIGBUS, SIGILL, SIGABRT and SIGFPE need to run
so we get backtraces. Otherwise the process just exits.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
In case interface address is learnt during configuration, make sure to
run DR election when configuring PIM/PIM passive on interface.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Issue:
When there is no traffic for a group, the LHR and RP take the default KAT+Join timer expiry of
a maximum of 480 seconds to clear the S,G . However, in the FHR, we update the state from JOINED
to NOT Joined, downstream state from PPto NOINFO. This restarts the ET timer, causing S,G on FHR to
take more than 10 minutes to age out.
In other words,
Consider a case where (S,G) is in Join state. When the traffic stops and the KAT (210) expires,
the Join expiry timer restarts. At this time, if we receive a prune, the expectation is to set
PPT to 0 (RFC 4601 sec 4.5.2).
When the PPT expires, we move to the noinfo state and restart the expiry timer one more time. We remove the
(S,G) entry only after ~10 minutes when there is no active traffic.
Summary:
KAT Join ET 210 + PP ET 210 + NOINFO ET 210.
Solution:
Delete the ifchannel when in noinfo state, and KAT is not running.
Ticket: #13703
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Varatharaj <rvaratharaj@nvidia.com>
