Until now, when bgp flowspec entry action was to redirect to a vrf, a
default route was installed in a specific table. that route was a vrf
route leak one. The process can be simplified, as vrf-lite already
has a table identifier. Actually, because policy routing is used to
redirect traffic to a defined table (with ip rule command), use
the table identifier of the VRF.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
- A more general fix for the bgp listener test which requires interfaces be
configured in the kernel when the bgpd daemons are launched.
Signed-off-by: Christian Hopps <chopps@labn.net>
This code always used double-linked list before this rework in 8.0 that
introduced all these crashes and memory leaks. Using single-linked list
is actually a performance regression, because there are frequent removes
here and single-linked list obviously handles removes much worse.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
When bgp_damp_info_free is called from bgp_route.c, we were never
deleting the BDI from the list.
Move the deletion inside bgp_damp_info_free to cover all cases.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Current code is a complete misuse of SLIST structure. Instead of just
adding a SLIST_ENTRY to struct bgp_damp_info, it allocates a separate
structure to be a node in the list.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
One more crash in dampening code...
When bgp_damp_withdraw is called, if there's already a BDI structure,
bgp_damp_info_claim is called to re-assign the bdi->config in case it
was changed. The problem is that bgp_damp_info_claim actually removes
the BDI from the reuse list of the old config and never adds it to the
reuse list of the new config. We must do this to prevent the crash
because all the code assumes that BDI is always in some list.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
The test_simple_snmp.py test starts bgp, zebra and snmpd at the
same time. Then zebra configuration is read in and interface
addresses are applied. If snmp start slower than zebra
the snmp process can properly get it's ip address to bind to
if it is faster than zebra, it will fail. Ensure that the
test has addresses before we start daemons.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
There exists some rare situations where fpm will attempt
to send a route update with no valid nexthops. In that
case an assert would be hit. This is not good for
trying to keep your routing daemons up and running
when we can safely just recover the situation.
Fixes#7588
Signed-off-by: batmancn <batmanustc@gmail.com>
<fixed commit message, and used zlog_err>
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The bgp ipv6 unicast node should be called `bgp ipv6 unicast`
to make it consistent with other nodes where we list the afi/safi
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
When running this test on a locally loaded system I am seeing the
static route as `queued` still after 1 second. Let's just blanket
increase the timeout to something longer to give a very loaded system
more time to install the route.
Output on my test system when it was loaded:
INFO topolog.r1:topogen.py:880 vtysh result:
{
"4.5.1.0/24":[
{
"prefix":"4.5.1.0/24",
"prefixLen":24,
"protocol":"static",
"vrfId":0,
"vrfName":"default",
"selected":true,
"destSelected":true,
"distance":1,
"metric":0,
"queued":true,
"table":254,
"internalStatus":8,
"internalFlags":73,
"internalNextHopNum":1,
"internalNextHopActiveNum":1,
"uptime":"00:00:00",
"nexthops":[
{
"flags":1,
"ip":"192.168.216.3",
"afi":"ipv4",
"interfaceIndex":11,
"interfaceName":"r1-eth6",
"active":true,
"weight":1
}
]
},
I suspect 10 seconds should be enough( I would hope ).
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
