Currently when the fpm_listener attempts to read say X
bytes it may only get Y( which is less than X ). In this
case we should assume that the dplane_fpm_nl code is just
being slow, as that we know it is possible for it to send
a partial fpm message. Let's just loosen the constraints
a bit and allow data to flow.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Sometimes, NHRP receives L2 information on a cache entry with the
0.0.0.0 IP address. NHRP considers it as valid and updates the binding
with the new IP address.
> Feb 09 20:09:54 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 162.251.180.10 nud 0x2 cache used 0 type 4
> Feb 09 20:10:35 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 162.251.180.10 nud 0x4 cache used 1 type 4
> Feb 09 20:10:48 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: del-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 162.251.180.10 nud 0x4 cache used 1 type 4
> Feb 09 20:10:49 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: who-has 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr (unspec) nud 0x1 cache used 1 type 4
> Feb 09 20:10:49 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QVXNM-NVHEQ] Netlink: update binding for 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 from c 162.251.180.10 peer.vc.nbma 162.251.180.10 to lladdr (unspec)
> Feb 09 20:10:49 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 0.0.0.0 nud 0x2 cache used 1 type 4
> Feb 09 20:11:30 aws-sin-vpn01 nhrpd[2695]: [QQ0NK-1H449] Netlink: new-neigh 10.2.114.238 dev dmvpn1 lladdr 0.0.0.0 nud 0x4 cache used 1 type 4
Actually, the 0.0.0.0 IP addressed mentiones in the 'who-has' message is
wrong because the nud state value means that value is incomplete and
should not be handled as a valid entry. Instead of considering it, fix
this by by invalidating the current binding. This step is necessary in
order to permit NHRP to trigger resolution requests again.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
The transmitted AS value in te tx open message of the peer up loc-rib
message is set to 0. Actually, it should reflect the AS value of the
current BGP instance.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
When forging BMP open message, the BGP router-id of tx open message of
the BMP LOC-RIB peer up message is always set to 0.0.0.0, whatever the
configured value of 'bgp router-id'.
Actually, when forging a peer up LOC-RIB message, the BGP router-id
value should be taken from the main BGP instance, and not from the peer
bgp identifier. Fix this by refreshing the router-id whenever a peer up
loc-rib message should be sent.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
In bgp route leak, when import vrf x is executed,
it creates bgp instance as hidden with asn value as unspecified.
When router bgp x is configured ensure the correct as,
asnotation is applied otherwise running config shows asn value as 0.
This can lead to frr-reload failure when any FRR config change.
Fix:
Move asn and asnotiation, as_pretty value in common done section,
so when bgp_create gets existing instance but before returning
update asn and required fields in common section.
In bgp_create(): when returning for hidden at least update asn
and required when bgp instance created implicitly due to vrf leak.
if (hidden) {
bgp = bgp_old;
goto peer_init; <<<
}
Before fix:
show running:
router bgp 0 vrf purple
bgp router-id 10.10.3.11
!
address-family ipv4 unicast
redistribute static
import vrf blue
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv6 unicast
import vrf blue
exit-address-family
!
address-family l2vpn evpn
advertise ipv4 unicast
advertise ipv6 unicast
exit-address-family
exit
Testing:
1) following snippet config:
router bgp 63420 vrf blue
import vrf purple
router bgp 63420 vrf purple
import vrf blue
2) restart frr leads to the running config with 0 asn value.
Signed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@nvidia.com>
When SRv6 is enabled and an SRv6 locator is specified in the BGP
configuration, BGP may attempt to request SRv6 locator information from
zebra before the connection is fully established. If this occurs, the
request fails with the following error:
```
2025/02/06 16:37:32 BGP: [HR66R-TWQYD][EC 100663302] srv6_manager_get_locator: invalid zclient socket
````
As a result, BGP is unable to obtain the locator information,
preventing SRv6 VPN from working.
This commit fixes the issue by ensuring BGP requests SRv6 locator
information once the connection with zebra is successfully established.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <cscarpit@cisco.com>
Blocking all signals on non-main threads is not the way to go, at least
the handlers for SIGSEGV, SIGBUS, SIGILL, SIGABRT and SIGFPE need to run
so we get backtraces. Otherwise the process just exits.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
In case interface address is learnt during configuration, make sure to
run DR election when configuring PIM/PIM passive on interface.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Issue:
When there is no traffic for a group, the LHR and RP take the default KAT+Join timer expiry of
a maximum of 480 seconds to clear the S,G . However, in the FHR, we update the state from JOINED
to NOT Joined, downstream state from PPto NOINFO. This restarts the ET timer, causing S,G on FHR to
take more than 10 minutes to age out.
In other words,
Consider a case where (S,G) is in Join state. When the traffic stops and the KAT (210) expires,
the Join expiry timer restarts. At this time, if we receive a prune, the expectation is to set
PPT to 0 (RFC 4601 sec 4.5.2).
When the PPT expires, we move to the noinfo state and restart the expiry timer one more time. We remove the
(S,G) entry only after ~10 minutes when there is no active traffic.
Summary:
KAT Join ET 210 + PP ET 210 + NOINFO ET 210.
Solution:
Delete the ifchannel when in noinfo state, and KAT is not running.
Ticket: #13703
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Varatharaj <rvaratharaj@nvidia.com>
Use a memory allocation specific type for filter names (to help detect memory
leaks) and fix a memory leak when releasing peer memory.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Our infrastructure was complaining about this:
2025/02/05 19:38:42 ISIS: [ZKB8W-3S2Q4][EC 100663330] unneeded 'modify' callback for '/frr-isisd:isis/instance/fast-reroute/level-1/lfa/tiebreaker/type'
2025/02/05 19:38:42 ISIS: [ZKB8W-3S2Q4][EC 100663330] unneeded 'modify' callback for '/frr-isisd:isis/instance/fast-reroute/level-2/lfa/tiebreaker/type'
Seems we don't need it. Let's just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This leak is happening:
Direct leak of 96 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
0 0x7f6922eb83b7 in __interceptor_calloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:77
1 0x7f6922a38ebb in qcalloc lib/memory.c:106
2 0x7f6922a553d6 in nexthop_add_srv6_seg6 lib/nexthop.c:652
3 0x562825e56b38 in parse_nexthop_unicast zebra/rt_netlink.c:589
4 0x562825e58c4a in netlink_route_change_read_unicast_internal zebra/rt_netlink.c:1291
5 0x562825e58eef in netlink_route_change_read_unicast zebra/rt_netlink.c:1321
6 0x562825e64921 in netlink_route_change zebra/rt_netlink.c:1494
7 0x562825e43407 in netlink_information_fetch zebra/kernel_netlink.c:407
8 0x562825e439b5 in netlink_parse_info zebra/kernel_netlink.c:1148
9 0x562825e44060 in kernel_read zebra/kernel_netlink.c:510
10 0x7f6922aeca72 in event_call lib/event.c:1984
11 0x7f6922a19e01 in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1246
12 0x562825e4b0b9 in main zebra/main.c:543
13 0x7f692250c249 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
Just check to see if it has been allocated. The nexthop is a stack
variable so it's a bit odd.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
