Disallow the resolution to nexthops that are marked duplicate.
When we are resolving to an ecmp group, it's possible this
group has duplicates.
I found this when I hit a bug where we can have groups resolving
to each other and cause the resolved->next->next pointer to increase
exponentially. Sufficiently large ecmp and zebra will grind to a hault.
Like so:
```
D> 4.4.4.14/32 [150/0] via 1.1.1.1 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
* via 1.1.1.1, dummy1 onlink, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.1 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.2 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.3 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.4 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.5 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.6 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.7 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.8 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.9 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.10 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.11 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.12 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.13 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.15 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1 onlink, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1 onlink, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 4.4.4.16 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1 onlink, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:02
D> 4.4.4.15/32 [150/0] via 1.1.1.1 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
* via 1.1.1.1, dummy1 onlink, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.1 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.2 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.3 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.4 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.5 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.6 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.7 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.8 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.9 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.10 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.11 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.12 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.13 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.14 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 4.4.4.16 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1 onlink, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:09
D> 4.4.4.16/32 [150/0] via 1.1.1.1 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:19
* via 1.1.1.1, dummy1 onlink, weight 1, 00:00:19
via 4.4.4.1 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:19
via 1.1.1.1, dummy1, weight 1, 00:00:19
via 4.4.4.2 (recursive), weight 1, 00:00:19
...............
................
and on...
```
You can repro the above via:
```
kernel routes:
1.1.1.1 dev dummy1 scope link
4.4.4.0/24 via 1.1.1.1 dev dummy1
==============================
config:
nexthop-group doof
nexthop 1.1.1.1
nexthop 4.4.4.1
nexthop 4.4.4.10
nexthop 4.4.4.11
nexthop 4.4.4.12
nexthop 4.4.4.13
nexthop 4.4.4.14
nexthop 4.4.4.15
nexthop 4.4.4.16
nexthop 4.4.4.2
nexthop 4.4.4.3
nexthop 4.4.4.4
nexthop 4.4.4.5
nexthop 4.4.4.6
nexthop 4.4.4.7
nexthop 4.4.4.8
nexthop 4.4.4.9
!
===========================
Then use sharpd to install 4.4.4.16 -> 4.4.4.1 pointing to that nexthop
group in decending order.
```
With these changes it prevents the growing ecmp above by disallowing
duplicates to be in the resolution decision. These nexthops are not
installed anyways so why should we be resolving to them?
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
The output from `show thread cpu` was not lined up appropriately
for the header line. As well as the function name we were
calling in the output. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
```
2523558-==2523558==
2523558-==2523558== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
2523558:==2523558== at 0x47F242: bgp_notify_admin_message (bgp_debug.c:505)
2523558-==2523558== by 0x47F242: bgp_notify_print (bgp_debug.c:534)
2523558-==2523558== by 0x4BA9BC: bgp_notify_receive (bgp_packet.c:1905)
2523558-==2523558== by 0x4BA9BC: bgp_process_packet (bgp_packet.c:2602)
2523558-==2523558== by 0x4904B7E: thread_call (thread.c:1681)
2523558-==2523558== by 0x48CAA27: frr_run (libfrr.c:1126)
2523558-==2523558== by 0x474B1A: main (bgp_main.c:540)
2523558-==2523558== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
2523558:==2523558== at 0x4BA33D: bgp_process_packet (bgp_packet.c:2529)
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
This command was put in place to allow upgrades for the
neighbor command from the BGP_NODE and have it put
into the ipv4 uni node instead. Since this
utterly kills the yang conversion. I believe we need
to remove this. Since people upgrading will just loose
the route-map applicatoin( if they are using such an old
config ) and RFC 8212 will come into play. They'll figure
it out pretty fast.
Fixes: #7983
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The calling function of ospf_nbr_nbma_lookup_next calls
this function and then immediately returns when it
gets the NULL. Just cleanup a bit more code.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
I am not even sure what the goal of this code was in any
way shape fashion or form. But since it's pbr_nht.c
I as the original author should know... But I don't.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Looks like the #if 0 code in this place was for ESI support
on solaris. We do not support solaris anymore. So let's
remove with prejudice.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The #if 0 code in ospfd, has not been compiled since at least
2012. If we are at least 9 years old at this point with no effort
to use or save, we should just get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Unconfig not resetting the peer-group member allowas_in[afi][safi]
This is causing remote route to be accept.
Signed-off-by: Kishore Kunal <kishorekunal01@broadcom.com>
If we are using a nexthop for a MPLS VPN route make sure the
nexthop is over a labeled path. This new check mirrors the one
in validate_paths (where routes are enabled when a nexthop
becomes reachable). The check is introduced to the code path
where routes are added and the nexthop is looked up.
Signed-off-by: Pat Ruddy <pat@voltanet.io>
