When forming a neighbor relationship on an interface, ospf is
currently evaluating unnumbered as highest priority, without
any consideration for if you have /32's and non /32's on the
interface. Effectively if I have something like this:
int foo0
ip address 192.168.119.1/24
!
router ospf
network 0.0.0.0/0 area 0
!
ospf will form a neighbor on foo0 if it exists. Now
suppose someone does this:
int foo0
ip address 192.168.120.1/32
This will create the unnumbered interface on foo0 and
the peering will come down immediately.
The problem here is that the original designers of the unnumbered
code for ospf didn't envision end operators mixing and matching
addresses on an interface like this ( for perfectly legitimate
reasons I might add ).
So if ospf has both numbered and unnumbered let's match against
the numbered first and then unnumbered. This solves the problem
Fixes: #6823
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
There are lib debugs being set but never show up in
`show debug` commands because there was no way to show
that they were being used. Add a bit of infrastructure
to allow this and then use it for `debug route-map`
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
It is not possible to build ospf_spf.c file with --disable-ospfapi because
ospf_apiserver.c has SUPPORT_OSPF_API around all function definitions and
that results in an undefined reference to the ospf_apiserver_notify_reachable
function error while building.
Signed-off-by: Michal Ruprich <mruprich@redhat.com>
Description:
Added hidden clis that will allow you to reset the default timers
for LSA refresh and LSA maxage remove delay, these will help in testing
LSA refresh scenarios in upcoming OSPFv2 Flood reduction feature(rfc4136).
IETF Link : https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4136
Signed-off-by: Manoj Naragund <mnaragund@vmware.com>
Description:
ospf process is crashing when the current router acts
as GR helper and it received a new lsa.
Here, ospf_lsa_different() is being called without checking
'old' pointer. It is asserted in ospf_lsa_different() api
if the 'old' pointer is NULL.
corrected this by validaing old pointer before calling
ospf_lsa_different() api.
back tarce:
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51
[Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x6b84348827c0 (LWP 3155))]
0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51
1 0x00006b8433aa4801 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
2 0x00006b8433a9439a in __assert_fail_base (fmt=0x6b8433c1b7d8 "%s%s%s:%u: %s%sAssertion `%s' failed.\n%n", assertion=assertion@entry=0x162ffc0630bc "l1", file=file@entry=0x162ffc062ff7 "ospfd/ospf_lsa.c", line=line@entry=3520, function=function@entry=0x162ffc0646f0 <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.18732> "ospf_lsa_different") at assert.c:92
3 0x00006b8433a94412 in __GI___assert_fail (assertion=assertion@entry=0x162ffc0630bc "l1", file=file@entry=0x162ffc062ff7 "ospfd/ospf_lsa.c", line=line@entry=3520, function=function@entry=0x162ffc0646f0 <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.18732> "ospf_lsa_different") at assert.c:101
4 0x0000162ffc008c25 in ospf_lsa_different (l1=l1@entry=0x0, l2=l2@entry=0x162ffe535c60, ignore_rcvd_flag=ignore_rcvd_flag@entry=true) at ospfd/ospf_lsa.c:3520
5 0x0000162ffc00a8e8 in ospf_lsa_install (ospf=ospf@entry=0x162ffe513650, oi=oi@entry=0x162ffe531c30, lsa=lsa@entry=0x162ffe535c60) at ospfd/ospf_lsa.c:2892
6 0x0000162ffc059d16 in ospf_flood (ospf=0x162ffe513650, nbr=nbr@entry=0x162ffe52cc90, current=current@entry=0x0, new=new@entry=0x162ffe535c60) at ospfd/ospf_flood.c:429
7 0x0000162ffc01838f in ospf_ls_upd (size=<optimized out>, oi=0x162ffe531c30, s=<optimized out>, ospfh=<optimized out>, iph=<optimized out>, ospf=<optimized out>) at ospfd/ospf_packet.c:2162
8 ospf_read_helper (ospf=<optimized out>) at ospfd/ospf_packet.c:3241
9 ospf_read (thread=<optimized out>) at ospfd/ospf_packet.c:3272
10 0x00006b843450139c in thread_call (thread=thread@entry=0x7780f42c7480) at lib/thread.c:1692
11 0x00006b84344cfb18 in frr_run (master=0x162ffe34d130) at lib/libfrr.c:1068
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Girada <rgirada@vmware.com>
Description:
Per neighbor GR enabled information is missing from json
output in "show ip ospf gr helper details json" command.
Example config:
frr(config-router)# graceful-restart helper enable 2.2.2.2
frr(config-router)#
frr(config-router)# do show ip ospf graceful-restart helper detail
OSPF Router with ID (10.112.156.220)
Graceful restart helper support disabled.
Strict LSA check is enabled.
Helper supported for Planned and Unplanned Restarts.
Supported Graceful restart interval: 1800(in seconds).
Enable Router list:
2.2.2.2,
frr(config-router)# do show ip ospf graceful-restart helper detail json
{
"routerId":"10.112.156.220",
"helperSupport":"Disabled",
"strictLsaCheck":"Enabled",
"restartSupoort":"Planned and Unplanned Restarts",
"supportedGracePeriod":1800,
}
frr(config-router)#
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Girada <rgirada@vmware.com>
When a neighbor goes down on an interface and that interface
has no more neighbors in a viable state where packets should
be being sent, then let's clear up the oi->obuf associated
with the interface the neighbor is on.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
ospf_write pulls an interface off the ospf->oi_write_q
then writes one packet and places it back on the queue,
keeping track of the first one sent. Then it will
stop sending packets even if we get back to the first
interface written too but before we have sent the full
pkt_count. I do not believe this makes a whole bunch
of sense and is very restrictive of how much data can
be sent especially if you have a limited number of peers
but large amounts of data. Why be so restrictive?
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
In ospf_handle_exnl_lsa_lsId_chg there is a code path
where that we may be using uninitialized data for decisions.
Doubtful that this happens but let's make it less likely to
even more.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Let's just use THREAD_OFF consistently in the code base
instead of each daemon having a special macro that needs to
be looked at and remembered what it does.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
