Even though OSPF_MAX_LSA_SIZE is quite large and holds the upper bound
on what can be written into a lsa, let's add a small check to ensure
it is not possible to do a bad thing.
This wins one of the long standing bug awards. 2003!
Fixes: #11602
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
FRR should create a bnc per peer. Not have
one's that write over others. Currently when
FRR has multiple Interface based peering, BGP wa
creating a single BNC. This is insufficient in that
we were accidently overwriting the one LL with other
data. This causes issues when there are multiple and
there is weird starting issues with those interfaces
that you are peering over.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This tests checks that there are no errors when receiving BFD
packets over the various linux vrf interfaces. For example, if
an incoming packet is received by the wrong socket, a VRF
mismatch error would occur, and BFD flapping would be observed.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Don't auto set the thread->arg pointer. It is private
and should be only accessed through the THREAD_ARG pointer.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Just convert all uses of thread_cancel to THREAD_OFF. Additionally
use THREAD_ARG instead of t->arg to get the arguement. Individual
files should never be accessing thread private data like this.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Let's just use THREAD_OFF consistently in the code base
instead of each daemon having a special macro that needs to
be looked at and remembered what it does.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Let's just use THREAD_OFF consistently in the code base
instead of each daemon having a special macro that needs to
be looked at and remembered what it does.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Let's just use THREAD_OFF consistently in the code base
instead of each daemon having a special macro that needs to
be looked at and remembered what it does.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Let's just use THREAD_OFF consistently in the code base
instead of each daemon having a special macro that needs to
be looked at and remembered what it does.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
If we have `end` at the end of the frr.conf, then we never execute
XFRR_end_configuration command, and start/end markers do not work.
This leads to for example waiting BGP configuration parsing thread to hang,
and the peers are in shutdown state until the timer expires.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
convert:
frr_with_mutex(..)
to:
frr_with_mutex (..)
To make all our code agree with what clang-format is going to produce
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The php value is defined in yang but not properly set.
Fixes: 8f6c893629 ("isisd: add segment-routing CLI commands")
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Until now, when in vrf-lite mode, the BFD implementation
creates a single UDP socket and relies on the following
sysctl value to 1:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/udp_l3mdev_accept
With this setting, the incoming BFD packets from a given
vrf, would leak to the default vrf, and would match the
UDP socket.
The drawback of this solution is that udp packets received
on a given vrf may leak to an other vrf. This may be a
security concern.
The commit addresses this issue by avoiding this leak
mechanism. An UDP socket is created for each vrf, and each
socket uses new setsockopt option: SO_REUSEADDR + SO_REUSEPORT.
With this option, the incoming UDP packets are distributed on
the available sockets. The impact of those options with l3mdev
devices is unknown. It has been observed that this option is not
needed, until the default vrf sockets are created.
To ensure the BFD packets are correctly routed to the appropriate
socket, a BPF filter has been put in place and attached to the
sockets : SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF. This option adds a criterium
to force the packet to choose a given socket. If initial criteria
from the default distribution algorithm were not good, at least
two sockets would be available, and the CBPF would force the
selection to the same socket. This would come to the situation
where an incoming packet would be processed on a different vrf.
The bpf code is the following one:
struct sock_filter code[] = {
{ BPF_RET | BPF_K, 0, 0, 0 },
};
struct sock_fprog p = {
.len = sizeof(code)/sizeof(struct sock_filter),
.filter = code,
};
if (setsockopt(sd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF, &p, sizeof(p))) {
zlog_warn("unable to set SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF on socket: %s",
strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
Some tests have been done with by creating vrf contexts, and by using
the below vtysh configuration:
ip route 2.2.2.2/32 10.126.0.2
vrf vrf2
ip route 2.2.2.2/32 10.126.0.2
!
interface ntfp2
ip address 10.126.0.1/24
!
interface ntfp3 vrf vrf4
ip address 10.126.0.1/24
!
interface ntfp2 vrf vrf1
ip address 10.126.0.1/24
!
interface ntfp2.100 vrf vrf2
ip address 10.126.0.1/24
!
interface ntfp2.200 vrf vrf3
ip address 10.126.0.1/24
!
line vty
!
bfd
peer 10.126.0.2 vrf vrf2
!
peer 10.126.0.2 vrf vrf3
!
peer 10.126.0.2
!
peer 10.126.0.2 vrf vrf4
!
peer 2.2.2.2 multihop local-address 1.1.1.1
!
peer 2.2.2.2 multihop local-address 1.1.1.1 vrf vrf2
transmit-interval 1500
receive-interval 1500
!
The results showed no issue related to packets received by
the wrong vrf. Even changing the udp_l3mdev_accept flag to
1 did not change the test results.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
