The definition of the interface commands in vtysh.c were outdated.
Currently, all daemons that call if_cmd_init() will have the "no interface
IFNAME" command and the "[no] description" commands as well, so there's
no need to define exceptions for these commands anymore.
To fix this, make extract.pl parse the if.c file so that vtysh can get the
interface commands from there automatically. Only the "interface IFNAME
[vrf NAME]" must be kept in vtysh.c because it changes the vty node and
thus needs special treatment.
Finally, make pimd and pbrd display interface descriptions on "sh run"
when they are configured.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
* Only zebra and pimd call vrf_cmd_init(), so these are the only daemons
that should receive VRF commands from vtysh;
* "netns NAME" and "no netns NAME" are available only in zebra, write
custom DEFSHs in vtysh to make it aware of that;
* Remove the "no vrf NAME" definition from vtysh.c and expose the
original command to vtysh by converting the DEFUN_NOSH to a simple
DEFUN. This command doesn't change the vty node so there's no need to
special case it.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
We must hide only "pseudowire IFNAME" from vtysh, the "no" form of the
command should be made available to the extract.pl script. Split the
command into two to fix this problem.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
All ldpd commands were written using DEFPY except the ones that needed
to be ignored by vtysh, in which case we were using DEFUN_NOSH. Now that
DEFPY_NOSH is available, convert the remaining commands for consistency
and to simplify the code a little bit.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
The frr_config_fork() function called by all FRR daemons during
initialization already takes care of reading the startup configuration
file.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
The correction in commit 7edb6aa (PR #2502) was wrong, as it is was not
taking in consideration the unlock counter. Thanks to @eqvinox for noticing
it.
Signed-off-by: F. Aragon <paco@voltanet.io>
There is no need to check for failure of a ALLOC call
as that any failure to do so will result in a assert
happening. So we can safely remove all of this code.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Problem reported that when a peer-group was added in certain
configurations, it would be rejected because of the order of the
commands put in by nclu. Issued turned out to be how frr-reload.py
was handling the sub-sub-context of the vni under the address-family
and subsequently how it handled the following exit-vni.
Ticket: CM-21996
Signed-off-by: Don Slice <dslice@cumulusnetworks.com>
Aded a check to ensure that if_is_vrf() is not called on a NULL if pointer.
Incidentally this was causing PR #2805 to fail.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Di Pascale <emanuele@voltanet.io>
pimd/pim_nht.c: In function ‘pim_ecmp_nexthop_search’:
pimd/pim_nht.c:523:17: error: ‘nbr’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
nexthop->nbr = nbr;
(on gcc 5.4.0; this is the only warning with that version.)
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>
