Building alpine packages in a "standard" distro can be
complicated due to the limited scope of the distro (embedded
and small docker images). Building in a VM is one possibility,
but docker support for alpine is very good (default docker images
come in alpine due to the very small size).
Here, we want to package up the current git repo into apk packages
that can be easily installed in alpine linux using the apk tool.
This support is not intended to package released versions of
apk packages, that, if it comes to be, should be done here:
git://git.alpinelinux.org/aports
We're content here to build packages that can be used by developers
to try out frr in docker and other alpine environments.
This is a very minimal environment, we don't support importing
keys (so, installing the packages with apk requires the
--allow-untrusted option). In addition, we can't use the
git commit id in hex as version tag, as alpine doesn't support hex
digits in the version string. So, we need to convert the git hash
to decimal before tagging the package with the extra version.
This is yucky, but I can't think of another way to get a
unique version per package. The alpine way (using a numeric date),
only works for released packages, not for dev packages.
Issue: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/1859
Signed-off-by: Arthur Jones <arthur.jones@riverbed.com>
When the pim_nexthop_lookup fails, close the opened fd
as part of the failure condition.
Additionally pim_nexthop_lookup assumes that we've
actually already looked up a nexthop in the past.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When figuring out whom to call and if we actually can legally
call into the handler array actually use the number of elements
in the array instead of the size of the array.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
We have a signed/unsigned comparison warning that this should
fix.
This should be ok because the range of input is a very limited
value and should never be of concern
Fixes: #1919
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When specifying a ip route:
ip route 4.3.2.0/24 192.168.201.1 vrf DONNA
Accept DONNA even if it has not been created yet.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
If a user enters a route inside a non kernel existant vrf:
vrf BLOOP
ip route 4.3.2.0/24 192.168.201.1
!
They should be able to enter it over and over and over and
over and over no matter how futile it is.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Currently if I try to use a nexthop-vrf that has
not been specified yet we get a failure from the cli.
Add code to zebra so that if we fail to find the nexthop-vrf
we auto create it, instead of failing the install.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Place the nexthop vrf id setting outside the afi if split
so that each side does not need to keep track of this.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Add code to sharpd to allow it to register for nexthop tracking
and then to display when it receives information about the nexthop
it is watching.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
When we are signaling to a client from zebra that a nexthop
has changed, include the labels on the nexthop as well.
Upper level protocols need to know if the labels exist
in order to make intelligent decisions about what to do.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
The application of a label to a route entry needs to
look at all non-recursive nexthops to be attached to
instead of just the first one.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
In bgp_update_receive the first thing we do is establish
that the peer->status is Established. We then do a bunch
of work and call bgp_nlri_parse where we break out for
each address family. Each AFI is then checking for
being peer->status is Established again. There is no
point in checking this again.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
The vtysh man page was referencing eigrp. Looked like a
cut-n-paste error?
Added some missing cli for the vtysh program, that users
might want to see.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
There were several places where when I am attempting
to debug zebra functionality that I would really
like to have the ability to know what vrf I think
I am operating on.
Add the vrf_id to a bunch of zlog_debug messages
to help figure out issues when they happen.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
