This is a first in a series of commits, whose goal is to rename
the thread system in FRR to an event system. There is a continual
problem where people are confusing `struct thread` with a true
pthread. In reality, our entire thread.c is an event system.
In this commit rename the thread.[ch] files to event.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Given that the following topology, route server MUST not modify NEXT_HOP
attribute because route server isn't in the actual routing path. This
behavior is required to comply RFC7947
(Router A) <-(eBGP peer)-> (Route Server) <-(eBGP peer)-> (Router B)
RFC7947 says as follows:
> As the route server does not participate in the actual routing of
> traffic, the NEXT_HOP attribute MUST be passed unmodified to the route
> server clients, similar to the "third-party" next-hop
> feature described in Section 5.1.3. of [RFC4271].
However, current FRR is violating RFC7947 in some cases. If routers and
route server established BGP peer over IPv6 connection and routers
advertise ipv4-vpn routes through route server, route server will modify
NEXT_HOP attribute in these advertisements.
This is because the condition to check whether NEXT_HOP attribute should
be changed or not is wrong. We should use (afi, safi) as the key to
check, but (nhafi, safi) is actually used. This causes the RFC7947
violation.
Signed-off-by: Ryoga Saito <ryoga.saito@linecorp.com>
Description:
Change is intended for fixing the inconsistencies present
while adjusting the SNT counters with default originate.
- SNT counter gets incremented on every change of policy associated
with default-originate, leading to inconsistencies.
- This fix has been added to ensure that the SNT counters gets
incremented and decremented only once during the creation and
deletion workflow of default-originate, and prevents
incrementing the counter during update flow.
Co-authored-by: Abhinay Ramesh <rabhinay@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Iqra Siddiqui <imujeebsiddi@vmware.com>
Abstract:
- The command "neighbor PEER maximum-prefix-out NUMBER" cannot be applied
without clearing the BGP neighbor.
- Apply the maximum-prefix-out value as soon as it is modified without
clearing the neighbor.
subgroup_update_packet() and subgroup_withdraw_packet() respectively
manages the announcement and withdrawal BGP message to the peer.
subgrp->scount counter counts the number of sent prefixes.
Before the patch, the maximum out prefix limitation was applied in
subgroup_update_packet() in order that subgrp->scount never exceeds the
limit. Setting a limit inferior to the effective number of sent prefix
did not result in sending any withdrawal message to reduce the number of
sent prefixes. Without clearing the BGP neighbor, the limitation only
applied to the announcement of new prefixes when the limitation was
over.
With the patch, the limitation is checked in subgroup_announce_check().
The function is intended to say whether a prefix has to be announced in
regards to the prefix-list, route-map... Now when a maximum-prefix-out
value is changed/removed, the neighbor AFI/SAFI table is re-parsed in
the same way as for the application of route-map, prefix-lists...
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
Gateway IP overlay index is generated for EVPN RT-5 when following CLI is
configured.
router bgp 100 vrf vrf-blue
address-family l2vpn evpn
advertise ipv4 unicast gateway-ip
advertise ipv6 unicast gateway-ip
BGP nexthop of the VRF IP/IPv6 route is set as the gateway IP of the
corresponding EVPN RT-5
Signed-off-by: Ameya Dharkar <adharkar@vmware.com>
When FRR creates a adj_out data structure we lock the `struct
bgp_dest` node associated with it. On freeing of this data
structure and removing the lock it was not associated with
the actual free of the adjacency structure. Let's clean up
the lock/unlock to be centralized to the alloc/free of the adj_out.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Added a macro to validate the v4 mapped v6 address.
Modified bgp receive & send updates for v4 mapped v6 address as
nexthop and installing it as recursive nexthop in RIB.
Minor change in fpm while sending the routes for nexthop as
v4 mapped v6 address.
Signed-off-by: Kaushik <kaushik@niralnetworks.com>
This is the bulk part extracted from "bgpd: Convert from `struct
bgp_node` to `struct bgp_dest`". It should not result in any functional
change.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Add new function `bgp_node_get_prefix()` and modify
the bgp code base to use it.
This is prep work for the struct bgp_dest rework.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Some were converted to bool, where true/false status is needed.
Converted to void only those, where the return status was only false or true.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
Problem reported that when a "neighbor x.x.x.x route-map FOO in"
set a next-hop value, that modified next-hop value was also sent
to eBGP peers. This is incorrect since bgp is expected to set
next-hop to self when sending to eBGP peers unless third party
next-hop on a shared segment is true. This fix modifies the
behavior to stop sending the modified next-hop to eBGP peers
if the route-map was applied inbound on another peer.
Ticket: CM-26025
Signed-off-by: Don Slice <dslice@cumulusnetworks.com>
The FIFO_* stuff in lib/fifo.h is no different from a simple unsorted
list. Just use DECLARE_LIST here so we can get rid of FIFO_*.
Signed-off-by: David Lamparter <equinox@opensourcerouting.org>
Prevent the ebgp sender from changing the nexthop( which is same as the ebgp neighbour ipv6 address),
while sending updates to its ipv6 neighbor.So,if the nexthop of the ipv6 route is same as the ipv6
neighbour address do not change the next hop to your own ip.
Signed-off-by: Biswajit Sadhu <sadhub@vmware.com>
The motivation for this patch is to address a concerning behavior of
tx-addpath-bestpath-per-AS. Prior to this patch, all paths' TX ID was
pre-determined as the path was received from a peer. However, this meant
that any time the path selected as best from an AS changed, bgpd had no
choice but to withdraw the previous best path, and advertise the new
best-path under a new TX ID. This could cause significant network
disruption, especially for the subset of prefixes coming from only one
AS that were also communicated over a bestpath-per-AS session.
The patch's general approach is best illustrated by
txaddpath_update_ids. After a bestpath run (required for best-per-AS to
know what will and will not be sent as addpaths) ID numbers will be
stripped from paths that no longer need to be sent, and held in a pool.
Then, paths that will be sent as addpaths and do not already have ID
numbers will allocate new ID numbers, pulling first from that pool.
Finally, anything left in the pool will be returned to the allocator.
In order for this to work, ID numbers had to be split by strategy. The
tx-addpath-All strategy would keep every ID number "in use" constantly,
preventing IDs from being transferred to different paths. Rather than
create two variables for ID, this patch create a more generic array that
will easily enable more addpath strategies to be implemented. The
previously described ID manipulations will happen per addpath strategy,
and will only be run for strategies that are enabled on at least one
peer.
Finally, the ID numbers are allocated from an allocator that tracks per
AFI/SAFI/Addpath Strategy which IDs are in use. Though it would be very
improbable, there was the possibility with the free-running counter
approach for rollover to cause two paths on the same prefix to get
assigned the same TX ID. As remote as the possibility is, we prefer to
not leave it to chance.
This ID re-use method is not perfect. In some cases you could still get
withdraw-then-add behaviors where not strictly necessary. In the case of
bestpath-per-AS this requires one AS to advertise a prefix for the first
time, then a second AS withdraws that prefix, all within the space of an
already pending MRAI timer. In those situations a withdraw-then-add is
more forgivable, and fixing it would probably require a much more
significant effort, as IDs would need to be moved to ADVs instead of
paths.
Signed-off-by Mitchell Skiba <mskiba@amazon.com>
The tx_id_buf was not being set to anything in some cases,
make sure it's a null string before using.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Do a straight conversion of `struct bgp_info` to `struct bgp_path_info`.
This commit will setup the rename of variables as well.
This is being done because `struct bgp_info` is not descriptive
of what this data actually is. It is path information for routes
that we keep to build the actual routes nexthops plus some extra
information.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
