When a refspec contains no rhs and thus won't cause an explicit update,
we skip all the logic, but that means that we don't update FETCH_HEAD
with it, which is what the implicit rhs is.
Add another bit of logic which puts those remote heads in the list of
updates so we put them into FETCH_HEAD.
When we don't own a buffer (asize=0) we currently allow the usage of
grow to copy the memory into a buffer we do own. This muddles the
meaning of grow, and lets us be a bit cavalier with ownership semantics.
Don't allow this any more. Usage of grow should be restricted to buffers
which we know own their own memory. If unsure, we must not attempt to
modify it.
We test the generation of the textual patch via the patch function,
which are just one of two possibilities to get the output.
Add a second patch generation via the diff function to make sure both
outputs are in sync.
Ensure that when a file is added in the index and subsequently
modified in the working directory, the stashed working directory
tree contains the actual working directory contents.
This is something we do on re-init but not when opening a
repository. This hasn't particularly mattered up to now as the version
has been 0 ever since the first release of git, but the times, they're
a-changing and we will soon see version 1 in the wild. We need to make
sure we don't open those.
If an index entry for a file that is not in HEAD is in conflicted state,
when diffing HEAD with the index, the status field of the corresponding git_diff_delta was incorrectly reported as GIT_DELTA_ADDED instead of GIT_DELTA_CONFLICTED.
This was due to handle_unmatched_new_item() initially setting the status
to GIT_DELTA_CONFLICTED but then overriding it later with GIT_DELTA_ADDED.
Support hierarchical test resource data, such that you can have
`tests/resources/foo/bar` and move the `bar` directory in as
a fixture.
Calling `cl_fixture_sandbox` on a path that is not directly beneath
the test resources directory succeeds, placing that directory into
the test fixture. (For example, `cl_fixture_sandbox("foo/bar")`
will sandbox the `foo/bar` directory as `bar`).
Add support for cleaning up directories created this way, by only
cleaning up the basename (in this example, `bar`) from the fixture
directory.
Given a variety of combinations of core.autocrlf settings and
attributes settings, test that we check out data into the working
directory the same as a known-good test resource created by git.git.
The current code will always fail, but only because it's asking for a
string on a live config. Take a snapshot and make sure we fail with
ENOTFOUND instead of any old error.
Similarly to the other ones. In this test we copy over testing
`RECURSE_YES` which shows an error in our handling of the `YES` variant
which we may have to port to the rest.
This lets us specify in the status call which ignore rules we want to
use (optionally falling back to whatever the submodule has in its
configuration).
This removes one of the reasons for having `_set_ignore()` set the value
in-memory. We re-use the `IGNORE_RESET` value for this as it is no
longer relevant but has a similar purpose to `IGNORE_FALLBACK`.
Similarly, we remove `IGNORE_DEFAULT` which does not have use outside of
initializers and move that to fall back to the configuration as well.
As submodules are becomes more like values, we should not let a status
check to update its properties. Instead of taking a submodule, have
status take a repo and submodule name.
Having this cache and giving them out goes against our multithreading
guarantees and it makes it impossible to use submodules in a
multi-threaded environment, as any thread can ask for a refresh which
may reallocate some string in the submodule struct which we've accessed
in a different one via a getter.
This makes the submodules behave more like remotes, where each object is
created upon request and not shared except explicitly by the user. This
means that some tests won't pass yet, as they assume they can affect the
submodule objects in the cache and that will affect later operations.
As we attempt to replicate a situation in which an older checkout has
put a file on disk with different filtering settings from us, set the
timestamp on the entry and file to a second before we're performing the
operation so the entry in the index counts as old.
This way we can test that we're not looking at the on-disk file when the
index has the entry and we detect it as clean.
This allows the user to look up fields which we don't parse in libgit2,
and allows them to access gpgsig or mergetag fields if they wish to
check the signature.
When a file on the workdir has the same or a newer timestamp than the
index, we need to perform a full check of the contents, as the update of
the file may have happened just after we wrote the index.
The iterator changes are such that we can reach inside the workdir
iterator from the diff, though it may be better to have an accessor
instead of moving these structs into the header.
When ticking over one second, it can happen that the actual time ticks
over the same second between the time that we undermine our own race
protections and the time in which we perform the index update. Such
timing would make the time in the entries match the index' timestamp and
we have not gained anything.
Ticking over five seconds makes it so that if real-time rolls over that
second, our index is still ahead. This is still suboptimal as we're
dealing with timing, but five seconds should be long enough for any
reasonable test runner to finish the tests.
These tests want to test that we don't recalculate entries which match
the index already. This is however something we force when truncating
racily-clean entries.
Tick the index forward as we know that we don't perform the
modifications which the racily-clean code is trying to avoid.
In order to avoid racy-git, we zero out the file size for entries with
the same timestamp as the index (or during the initial checkout). This
is the case in a couple of crlf tests, as the code is fast enough to do
everything in the same second.
As we know that we do not perform the modification just after writing
out the index, which is what this is designed to work around, tick the
mtime of the index file such that it doesn't agree with the files
anymore, and we do not zero out these entries.
We update the index and then immediately change the contents of the
file. This makes the diff think there are no changes, as the timestamp
of the file agrees with the cached data. This is however a bug, as the
file has obviously changed contents.
The test is a bit fragile, as it assumes that the index writing and the
following modification of the file happen in the same second, but it's
enough to show the issue.
Introduce a new binary diff callback to provide the actual binary
delta contents to callers. Create this data from the diff contents
(instead of directly from the ODB) to support binary diffs including
the workdir, not just things coming out of the ODB.
Some tools create multiple author fields. git is rather lax when parsing
them, although fsck does complain about them. This means that they exist
in the wild.
As it's not too taxing to check for them, and there shouldn't be a
noticeable slowdown when dealing with correct commits, add logic to skip
over these extra fields when parsing the commit.
When the callback returns an error, we should stop immediately. This
broke when trying to make sure we pass specific errors up the chain.
This broke cancelling out of the loose backend's foreach.
A remote's URLs are now modified according to the url.*.insteadOf
and url.*.pushInsteadOf configurations. This allows a user to
replace URL prefixes by setting the corresponding keys. E.g.
"url.foo.insteadOf = bar" would replace the prefix "bar" with the
new prefix "foo".
Treat input bytes as unsigned before doing arithmetic on them,
lest we look at some non-ASCII byte (like a UTF-8 character) as a
negative value and perform the comparison incorrectly.
We do not error on "merge conflicts"; on the contrary, merge conflicts
are a normal part of merging. We only error on "checkout conflicts",
where a change exists in the index or the working directory that would
otherwise be overwritten by performing the checkout.
This *may* happen during merge (after the production of the new index
that we're going to checkout) but it could happen during any checkout.
When confronted with a conflict in the index, `git_index_add_all`
should stage the working directory copy. If there is no file in the
working directory, the conflict should simply be removed.
It's not always obvious the mapping between stage level and
conflict-ness. More importantly, this can lead otherwise sane
people to write constructs like `if (!git_index_entry_stage(entry))`,
which (while technically correct) is unreadable.
Provide a nice method to help avoid such messy thinking.
Since a diff entry only concerns a single entry, zero the information
for the index side of a conflict. (The index entry would otherwise
erroneously include the lowest-stage index entry - generally the
ancestor of a conflict.)
Test that during status, the index side of the conflict is empty.
When diffing against an index, return a new `GIT_DELTA_CONFLICTED`
delta type for items that are conflicted. For a single file path,
only one delta will be produced (despite the fact that there are
multiple entries in the index).
Index iterators now have the (optional) ability to return conflicts
in the index. Prior to this change, they would be omitted, and callers
(like diff) would omit conflicted index entries entirely.
When we moved from acting on the instance to acting on the
configuration, we dropped the validation of the passed refspec, which
can lead to writing an invalid refspec to the configuration. Bring that
validation back.
When we look for which remote corresponds to a remote-tracking branch,
we look in the refspecs to see which ones matches. If none do, we should
abort. We currently ignore the error message from this operation, so
let's not do that anymore.
As part of the test we're writing, let's test for the expected behaviour
if we cannot find a refspec which tells us what the remote-tracking
branch for a remote would look like.
When we find out that we're dealing with a matching refspec, we set the
flag and return immediately. This leaves the strings as NULL, which
breaks the contract.
Assign these pointers to a string with the correct values.
When we discover that we want to keep a negative rule, make sure to
clear the error variable, as it we otherwise return whatever was left by
the previous loop iteration.
The code used to rely on the clone code calling the remote's save, which
does not happen anymore, meaning that the configuration settings the
remote expected were not being written to disk.
The run-time configuration was still being affected, so the right branch
was being cloned. The tests continued to pass as we did not check for
the configuration entires. Fix this by creating the remote with the
single-branch refspec we want and checking for its existence in the
configuration.
A couple of tests use the wrong remote to push to. We did not notice up
to now because the local push would copy individual objects, and those
already existed, so it became a no-op.
Once we made local push create the packfile, it became noticeable that
there was a new packfile where it didn't belong.
The base refspecs changing can be a cause of confusion as to what is the
current base refspec set and complicate saving the remote's
configuration.
Change `git_remote_add_{fetch,push}()` to update the configuration
instead of an instance.
This finally makes `git_remote_save()` a no-op, it will be removed in a
later commit.
While this will rarely be different from the default, having it in the
remote adds yet another setting it has to keep around and can affect its
behaviour. Move it to the options.
Instead of having it set in a different place from every other callback,
put it the main structure. This removes some state from the remote and
makes it behave more like clone, where the constructors are passed via
the options.
As a first step in removing the repository-saving logic, don't allow
chaning the url or push url from a remote object, but change the
configuration on the configuration immediately.
Having the setting be different from calling its actions was not a great
idea and made for the sake of the wrong convenience.
Instead of that, accept either fetch options, push options or the
callbacks when dealing with the remote. The fetch options are currently
only the callbacks, but more options will be moved from setters and
getters on the remote to the options.
This does mean passing the same struct along the different functions but
the typical use-case will only call git_remote_fetch() or
git_remote_push() and so won't notice much difference.
Ensure that when examining a .gitignore in a subdirectory, we do not
erroneously apply the paths contained therein to the root of the
repository. (Fixed in c02a0e4).
We have a few tests checking each step, but we do not yet have a test
which tests the documented workflow for creating a submodule, namely
`setup_add` followed by cloning into it, followed by `add_finalize`.
Add such a test to protect against regressions in this workflow.