We currently consider CR to start the end of the line, but that means
that we miss cases with CR CR LF which can be used with git to match
files whose names have CR at the end of their names.
The fix from the patch comes from Russell's comment in the issue.
This fixes#2536.
* Error-handling is cleaned up to only let a file-not-found error
through, not other sorts of errors. And when a file-not-found
error happens, we clean up the error.
* Test now checks that file-not-found introduces no error. And
other minor cleanups.
An anonymous remote wouldn't create remote-tracking branches, so testing
we don't create them for TAGS_ALL is nonsensical. Furthermore, the name
of the supposed remote-tracking branch was also not one which would have
been created had it had a name.
Give the remote a name and test that we only create the tags when we
pass TAGS_ALL and that we do create the remote-branch branch when given
TAGS_AUTO.
When we update FETCH_HEAD we check whether the remote is the current
branch's upstream remote. The code does not check whether the current
refspec is relevant for this reference but always tries to perform the
reverse transformation, which causes it to error out if the refspec
doesn't match the reference.
Thanks to Pierre-Olivier Latour for the reproduction recipe.
For example, if you have
[include]
path = foo
and foo didn't exist, git_config_open_ondisk() would just give up
on the rest of the file. Now it ignores the unresolved include
without error and continues reading the rest of the file.
Already cherry-picked commits should not be re-included. If all changes
included in a commit exist in the upstream, then we should error with
GIT_EAPPLIED.
`git_rebase_next` will apply the next patch (or cherry-pick)
operation, leaving the results checked out in the index / working
directory so that consumers can resolve any conflicts, as appropriate.
Remote objects are not meant to be changed from under the user. We did
this in rename, but only the name and left the refspecs, such that a
save would save the wrong refspecs (and a fetch and anything else would
use the wrong refspecs).
Instead, let's simply take a name and not change any loaded remote from
under the user.
This function does not in fact tell us anything, as almost anything with
a colon in it is a valid rsync-style SSH path; it can not tell us that
we do not support ftp or afp or similar as those are still valid SSH
paths and we do support that.
Git for Windows will handle UNC paths only when in forward-slash
format, eg "//server/path". When given a UNC path as a remote,
rewrite standard format ("\\server\path") into this ridiculous
format.
The entry_count field is the amount of index entries covered by a
particular cache entry, that is how many files are there (recursively)
under a particular directory.
The current code that attemps to do this is severely defincient and is
trying to count the amount of children, which always comes up to zero.
We don't even need to recount, since we have the information during the
cache creation. We can take that number and keep it, as we only ever
invalidate or replace.
Keeping the cache around after read-tree is only one part of the
optimisation opportunities. In order to share the cache between program
instances, we need to write the TREE extension to the index.
Do so, taking the opportunity to rename 'entries' to 'entry_count' to
match the name given in the format description. The included test is
rather trivial, but works as a sanity check.
We don't need the remote loaded, and the function extracted both of
these from the git_remote in order to do its work, so let's remote a
step and not ask for the loaded remote at all.
This fixes#2390.
A transaction allows you to lock multiple references and set up changes
for them before applying the changes all at once (or as close as the
backend supports).
This can be used for replication purposes, or for making sure some
operations run when the reference is locked and thus cannot be changed.
When a list of refspecs is passed to fetch (what git would consider
refspec passed on the command-line), we not only need to perform the
updates described in that refspec, but also update the remote-tracking
branch of the fetched remote heads according to the remote's configured
refspecs.
These "fetches" are not however to be written to FETCH_HEAD as they
would be duplicate data, and it's not what the user asked for.
With opportunistic ref updates, git has introduced the concept of having
base refspecs *and* refspecs that are active for a particular fetch.
Let's start by letting the user override the refspecs for download.
When we describe the workdir, we perform a describe on HEAD and then
check to see if the worktree is dirty. If it is and we have a suffix
string, we append that to the buffer.
Instead of printing out to the buffer inside the information-gathering
phase, write the data to a intermediate result structure.
This allows us to split the options into gathering options and
formatting options, simplifying the gathering code.
