This option does not get persisted to disk, which makes it different
from the rest of the setters. Remove it until we go all the way.
We still respect the configuration option, and it's still possible to
perform a one-time prune by calling the function.
This is hiding a bug in the prune code, whereby we prune references we
shouldn't but don't notice it in the code afterwards because
update_tips() recreates them.
This means that we do perform changes to the references (and get rid of
the reflogs) when we shouldn't.
When creating a new remote, contrary to loading one from disk,
active_refspecs was not populated. This means that if using the new
remote to push, git_push_update_tips() will be a no-op since it
checks the refspecs passed during the push against the base ones
i.e. active_refspecs. And therefore the local refs won't be created
or updated after the push operation.
There is one well-known and well-tested parser which we should use,
instead of implementing parsing a second time.
The common parser is also augmented to copy the LHS into the RHS if the
latter is empty.
The expressions test had to change a bit, as we now catch a bad RHS of a
refspec locally.
If the remote is anonymous, then we cannot check for any configuration,
as there is no name. Check for this before we try to use the name, which
may be a NULL pointer.
This fixes#2697.
An anonymous remote wouldn't create remote-tracking branches, so testing
we don't create them for TAGS_ALL is nonsensical. Furthermore, the name
of the supposed remote-tracking branch was also not one which would have
been created had it had a name.
Give the remote a name and test that we only create the tags when we
pass TAGS_ALL and that we do create the remote-branch branch when given
TAGS_AUTO.
When we update FETCH_HEAD we check whether the remote is the current
branch's upstream remote. The code does not check whether the current
refspec is relevant for this reference but always tries to perform the
reverse transformation, which causes it to error out if the refspec
doesn't match the reference.
Thanks to Pierre-Olivier Latour for the reproduction recipe.
Remote objects are not meant to be changed from under the user. We did
this in rename, but only the name and left the refspecs, such that a
save would save the wrong refspecs (and a fetch and anything else would
use the wrong refspecs).
Instead, let's simply take a name and not change any loaded remote from
under the user.
This function does not in fact tell us anything, as almost anything with
a colon in it is a valid rsync-style SSH path; it can not tell us that
we do not support ftp or afp or similar as those are still valid SSH
paths and we do support that.
We don't need the remote loaded, and the function extracted both of
these from the git_remote in order to do its work, so let's remote a
step and not ask for the loaded remote at all.
This fixes#2390.
When a list of refspecs is passed to fetch (what git would consider
refspec passed on the command-line), we not only need to perform the
updates described in that refspec, but also update the remote-tracking
branch of the fetched remote heads according to the remote's configured
refspecs.
These "fetches" are not however to be written to FETCH_HEAD as they
would be duplicate data, and it's not what the user asked for.
With opportunistic ref updates, git has introduced the concept of having
base refspecs *and* refspecs that are active for a particular fetch.
Let's start by letting the user override the refspecs for download.
When the fetch refspec does not include the remote's default branch, it
indicates an error in user expectations or programmer error. Error out
in that case.
This lets us get rid of the dummy refspec which can never work as its
zeroed out. In the cases where we did not find a default branch, we set
HEAD detached immediately, which lets us refactor the "normal" path,
removing `found_branch`.
Add tests for the case when there are no branches on the remote and when
HEAD is detached but has the id of a non-branch. In both of these cases,
we should return ENOTFOUND.
It does the same as git_remote_supported_url() but has a name which
implies we'd check the URL for correctness while we're simply looking at
the scheme and looking it up in our lists.
While here, fix up the tests so we check all the combination of what's
supported.
