When we insert e.g. a tag or tagged object into the packfile, we must
make sure to insert any referenced objects as well, or we will have
broken links.
Use the recursive version of packfile insertion to make sure we send
over not just the tagged object but also the objects it references.
This function recursively inserts the given object and any referenced
ones. It can be thought of as a more general version of the functions to
insert a commit or tree.
When there is a tag, we must make sure that we get all referenced
objects from this tag as well. This failing test shows that e.g. when
there is a tagged tree, we insert the top tree but do not descend, thus
causing the clone to have broken links.
Since the Linux platform has a case sensitive file system, the header name should be lower case for cross compiling purposes. (On Linux, the mingw header is called ```windows.h```).
When the user has a certificate check callback set, we still have to
check whether the stream we're using is even capable of providing a
certificate.
In the case of an unencrypted certificate, do not ask for it from the
stream, and do not call the callback.
This extra constructor will be useful for the annotated versions of
ref-modifying functions, as it allows us to create a commit with the
extended sha syntax which was used to retrieve it.
We do not always want to put the id directly into the reflog, but we
want to speicfy what a user typed. For this use-case we provide
annotated version of a few functions which let the caller specify what
user-friendly name was used when asking for the operation.
It turns out that erroring out on duplicate commits is the right thing
to do, but git was not hitting the bug on the server-side.
Bring back a descriptive error message in case of duplicate entries and
error out.
If a packfile includes duplicate objects, we can choose to use the
secon copy instead of the first by using the same logic as if it were
the first.
Change the error condition from 0 to -1, which indicates a bad resize,
and set the OOM message in that case.
This does mean we will leak the first copy of the object. We can deal
with that later, but making fetches work is more important.
While this is not even close to a fix, we can at least set an error
message so we know which error we are facing. Up to know we just
returned an error without a message.
This was but down to 5 when GitHub made a change to their server which
made them stop honouring the include-tag request.
This has recently been corrected, so we can bring it back up to six.
Currently git_submodule_sync writes the submodule's URL to the
key 'branch.<REMOTE_NAME>.remote' while the reference
implementation of `git submodule sync` writes to
'remote.<REMOTE_NAME>.url', which is the intended behavior
according to git-submodule(1).
