tpm2: NVMarshal: Handle index orderly RAM without 0-sized terminating node

The NVRAM entries in s_indexOrderlyRam array do not need to contain a
0-sized terminating node. Instead, the entries may fill up this 512
byte array so that no NV_RAM_HEADER structure fits anymore. The fact
that no more NV_RAM_HEADER structure fits is also an indicator for the
last entry. We need to account for this in the code marshalling and
unmarshalling the entries so that we stop marshalling the entries
then and similarly stop unmarshalling.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Stefan Berger 2021-07-23 13:29:00 -04:00 committed by Stefan Berger
parent 17255da54c
commit 034a5c0248

View File

@ -4269,6 +4269,12 @@ INDEX_ORDERLY_RAM_Marshal(void *array, size_t array_size,
datasize, buffer, size);
}
offset += nrh.size;
if (offset + sizeof(NV_RAM_HEADER) > array_size) {
/* nothing will fit anymore and there won't be a 0-sized
* terminating node (@1).
*/
break;
}
}
written += BLOCK_SKIP_WRITE_PUSH(TRUE, buffer, size);
@ -4311,6 +4317,16 @@ INDEX_ORDERLY_RAM_Unmarshal(void *array, size_t array_size,
*/
nrhp = array + offset;
if (offset + sizeof(NV_RAM_HEADER) > sourceside_size) {
/* this case can occur with the previous entry filling up the
* space; in this case there will not be a 0-sized terminating
* node (see @1 above). We clear the rest of our space.
*/
if (array_size > offset)
memset(nrhp, 0, array_size - offset);
break;
}
/* write the NVRAM header;
nrh->size holds the complete size including data;
nrh->size = 0 indicates the end */