From 034a5c02488cf7f0048e130177fc71c9e626e135 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Berger Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:29:00 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] tpm2: NVMarshal: Handle index orderly RAM without 0-sized terminating node The NVRAM entries in s_indexOrderlyRam array do not need to contain a 0-sized terminating node. Instead, the entries may fill up this 512 byte array so that no NV_RAM_HEADER structure fits anymore. The fact that no more NV_RAM_HEADER structure fits is also an indicator for the last entry. We need to account for this in the code marshalling and unmarshalling the entries so that we stop marshalling the entries then and similarly stop unmarshalling. Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger --- src/tpm2/NVMarshal.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/tpm2/NVMarshal.c b/src/tpm2/NVMarshal.c index 8e0ec0b4..e3db9d64 100644 --- a/src/tpm2/NVMarshal.c +++ b/src/tpm2/NVMarshal.c @@ -4269,6 +4269,12 @@ INDEX_ORDERLY_RAM_Marshal(void *array, size_t array_size, datasize, buffer, size); } offset += nrh.size; + if (offset + sizeof(NV_RAM_HEADER) > array_size) { + /* nothing will fit anymore and there won't be a 0-sized + * terminating node (@1). + */ + break; + } } written += BLOCK_SKIP_WRITE_PUSH(TRUE, buffer, size); @@ -4311,6 +4317,16 @@ INDEX_ORDERLY_RAM_Unmarshal(void *array, size_t array_size, */ nrhp = array + offset; + if (offset + sizeof(NV_RAM_HEADER) > sourceside_size) { + /* this case can occur with the previous entry filling up the + * space; in this case there will not be a 0-sized terminating + * node (see @1 above). We clear the rest of our space. + */ + if (array_size > offset) + memset(nrhp, 0, array_size - offset); + break; + } + /* write the NVRAM header; nrh->size holds the complete size including data; nrh->size = 0 indicates the end */