mirror of
https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost-device.git
synced 2026-01-06 18:58:31 +00:00
The vhost_user::Error::Disconnected error code is returned by the daemon if the VM is shutting down. Don't Warn the user in this case but just point out that VM may be shutting down. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| src | ||
| test | ||
| ARCHITECTURE.md | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| CHANGELOG.md | ||
| LICENSE-APACHE | ||
| LICENSE-BSD-3-Clause | ||
| README.md | ||
vhost-user-scsi
This is a Rust implementation of a vhost-user-scsi daemon.
Usage
Run the vhost-user-scsi daemon:
vhost-user-scsi -r --socket-path /tmp/vhost-user-scsi.sock /path/to/image.raw /path/to/second-image.raw ...
Run QEMU:
qemu-system-x86_64 ... \
-device vhost-user-scsi-pci,num_queues=1,param_change=off,chardev=vus \
-chardev socket,id=vus,path=/tmp/vhost-user-scsi.sock \
# must match total guest meory
-object memory-backend-memfd,id=mem,size=384M,share=on \
-numa node,memdev=mem
Limitations
We are currently only supporting a single request queue and do not support dynamic reconfiguration of LUN parameters (VIRTIO_SCSI_F_CHANGE).
Features
This crate is a work-in-progress. Currently, it's possible to mount and read up to 256 read-only raw disk images. Some features we might like to add at some point, roughly ordered from sooner to later:
- Write support. This should just be a matter of implementing the WRITE command, but there's a bit of complexity around writeback caching we need to make sure we get right.
- Support more LUNs. virtio-scsi supports up to 16384 LUNs per target. After 256, the LUN encoding format is different; it's nothing too complicated, but I haven't gotten around to implementing it.
- Concurrency. Currently, we process SCSI commands one at a time. Eventually, it'd be a good idea to use threads or some fancy async/io_uring stuff to concurrently handle multiple commands. virtio-scsi also allows for multiple request queues, allowing the guest to submit requests from multiple cores in parallel; we should support that.
- iSCSI passthrough. This shouldn't be too bad, but it might be a good idea to decide on a concurrency model (threads or async) before we spend too much time here.