On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 20:15:30 +0200, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> wrote:
> Is it really safe ignoring write to this register? If yes, it's probably
> a good idea to explain why in a comment. In any case, if supporting this
> register is easy to do, it would be the best option.
I think it is safe. Please see an updated comment below.
And though implementing this register might be possible, I suppose it
is not worth to supporting FrameTooLong detection, for now at least.
Thank you for comments.
>8---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 23:12:07 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] lan9118: Ignore write to MAC_VLAN1 register
Since linux 2.6.38, smsc911x driver writes to VLAN1 registger.
Since this register only affects FrameTooLong detection, ignoring
write to this register should be safe.
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
(cherry picked from commit a0313c00fc)
Fix a buffer overflow, reported by cppcheck:
[/src/qemu/hw/lan9118.c:849]: (error) Buffer access out-of-bounds: s.eeprom
All eeprom handling code assumes that the size of eeprom is 128,
except lan9118_eeprom_cmd. Fix this by restricting the address passed.
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
As stated before, devices can be little, big or native endian. The
target endianness is not of their concern, so we need to push things
down a level.
This patch adds a parameter to cpu_register_io_memory that allows a
device to choose its endianness. For now, all devices simply choose
native endian, because that's the same behavior as before.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Anything that moves hundreds of lines out of vl.c can't be all bad.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
