If neither the 'remove' option of vzdump nor the 'maxfiles' option in
the storage config are set, assume a value of 0, i.e. do not delete
anything and allow unlimited backups.
Restores previous behaviour that was broken in e6946086e3.
Also fixes a warning about using '== 0' on a non-number type.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
If a guest's QEMU process is 'running', but QMP says 'shutdown' or
'prelaunch', the VM is ready to be booted anew, so we can show the
button.
The 'shutdown' button is intentionally not touched, as we always want to
give the user the ability to 'stop' a VM (and thus kill any potentially
leftover processes).
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
fixes commit f354fe47fc, which changed
the logic to the newer storage prune helpers, but those are designed
in the spirits of PBS, with a keep-option not set meaning to keep
none.
This does not respects the storage special handling of maxfiles.
While in the API/CLI that option must be > 0m in can be zero when set
in a storage configuration entry, and then it means keep all. So, set
the internal remove option to false if that special condition is met.
This would have been a clearer, and less prone to changes,
implementation to begin with.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
since some users don't even have a full 1500 (and some systems might
have links with bigger MTU and not require as much fragmentation).
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
The me variable should only be assigned from `this`, else it gets
confusing and wrong fast.
here the managed listener tried to do a this.reload, but this is
ambiguous here, and not the controller.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
they cannot really be alphabetically sorted, as else some elements
are tried to be accessed before they are defined, which makes ExtJS
do a HTTP request for them.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
after creation, so that users don't need to go the ceph tooling route.
Separate common pool options to reuse them in other places.
Signed-off-by: Alwin Antreich <a.antreich@proxmox.com>
to reduce code duplication and make it easier to add more options for
pool commands.
Use a new rados object for each 'osd pool set', as each command can set
an option independent of the previous commands success/failure. On
failure a new rados object would need to be created and that will
confuse task tracking of the REST environment.
Signed-off-by: Alwin Antreich <a.antreich@proxmox.com>
The assumption that they already are sorted is no longer valid,
because of the IDs for non-existent guests.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Like this, there will be a backup task (within the big worker task)
for such IDs, which will then visibly (i.e. also visible in the
notification mail) fail with, e.g.:
unable to find VM '123'
In get_included_guests, the key '' was chosen for the orphaned IDs,
because it cannot possibly denote a nodename.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Commit 1a87db9e56 introduced
a usage of plugin before the truthiness check for plugin.
At the moment it might not be possible to trigger this anymore,
because of the guest inclusion rework that happened later on.
But to make tasks for inexistent guest IDs visibly fail again,
this check will be necessary. Also, to get the error message in
the mail, it needs to fail inside the eval block.
Thus, keep the check in the eval block and move the block of code
using the plugin to below the check.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
this fixes an issue where a rogue running backup would upload the vm
config of a later backup in a backup job
instead now that directory gets deleted and the config is not
available anymore
we cannot really keep those directories around until the end of the
backup job, since we temporarily save ct contents there, which could get
large very fast
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
as else the window is not centered if it only grows in size after
ExtJS rendered it completely once.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
The new boot order property can express many more scenarios than the old
one. Update the editor so it can handle it.
Features a grid with all supported boot devices which can be reordered
using drag-and-drop, as well as toggled on and off with an inline
checkbox.
Support for configs still using the old format is given, with the first
write automatically updating the VM config to use the new one.
The renderer for the Options panel is updated with support for the new
format.
Note that it is very well possible to disable all boot devices, in which
case an empty 'boot: ' will be stored to the config file. I'm not sure
what that would be useful for, but there's no reason to forbid it
either, just warn the user that it's probably not what they want.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Allows 2 digits rule numbers to be visible in the column. Made it a bit
wider than needed to account for potentially wider font rendering on
different platforms.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
For the use case with '--dumpdir', it's not possible to call prune_backups
directly, so a little bit of special handling is required there.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
and make the two options mutally exclusive as long
as they are specified on the same level (e.g. both
from the storage configuration). Otherwise prefer
option > storage config > default (only maxfiles has a default currently).
Defines the backup limit for prune-backups as the sum of all
keep-values.
There is no perfect way to determine whether a
new backup would trigger a removal with prune later:
1. we would need a way to include the not yet existing backup
in a 'prune --dry-run' check.
2. even if we had that check, if it's executed right before
a full hour, and the actual backup happens after the full
hour, the information from the check is not correct.
So in some cases, we allow backup jobs with remove=0, that
will lead to a removal when the next prune is executed.
Still, the job with remove=0 does not execute a prune, so:
1. There is a well-defined limit.
2. A job with remove=0 never removes an old backup.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
if the checkbox is not checked, we set the value of the vmid filter to ''
but left 'exactMatch' enabled, which means we filter all out where
the vmid is not ''
what we instead want is to remove also the exactMatch so that we
get *all* entries back not *none*
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
and regular users to read all their own tasks as well as those of their
associated tokens.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
