Surely still not perfect but even me, a comma loving creator of
complex sentences, found rather hard to follow, so this had to get
split up.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
We ship our own fwupd package, since it needs to handle the
differently named efi_os_dir (proxmox vs debian).
Due to our experience with `udisks2` causing issues on hypervisors,
our package downgraded the Recommends udisks2, to a Suggests.
The downside is, that users need to explicitly set their ESP
mountpoint in the config file.
Additionally a minor stylistic rephrasing (is an option vs. could be
an option).
Tested this today, while giving our fwupd package a spin.
Suggested-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Chapter "Firmware Updates":
* improve the structure and clarity of information provided
* mention which update methods are when available/recommended
* add information about the already pre-installed pve-firmware package
* emphasise the importance of CPU microcode updates, how to interpret
versions and how to recover a possibly unbootable system
* move info about non-free-firmware repo to "Package Repositories"
Chapter "Package Repositories":
* add new section "Debian Firmware Repository"
Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
Firmware updates are important, their existence should not be checked
only when there are already noticeable problems.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
