mirror of
https://git.proxmox.com/git/pve-docs
synced 2025-05-28 15:31:23 +00:00
change links from master/mimic to luminous
Signed-off-by: David Limbeck <d.limbeck@proxmox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b323458439
commit
127ca40947
@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ and VMs on the same node is possible.
|
||||
To simplify management, we provide 'pveceph' - a tool to install and
|
||||
manage {ceph} services on {pve} nodes.
|
||||
|
||||
.Ceph consists of a couple of Daemons footnote:[Ceph intro http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/start/intro/], for use as a RBD storage:
|
||||
.Ceph consists of a couple of Daemons footnote:[Ceph intro http://docs.ceph.com/docs/luminous/start/intro/], for use as a RBD storage:
|
||||
- Ceph Monitor (ceph-mon)
|
||||
- Ceph Manager (ceph-mgr)
|
||||
- Ceph OSD (ceph-osd; Object Storage Daemon)
|
||||
@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ Since Luminous (12.2.x) you can also have multiple active metadata servers
|
||||
running, but this is normally only useful for a high count on parallel clients,
|
||||
as else the `MDS` seldom is the bottleneck. If you want to set this up please
|
||||
refer to the ceph documentation. footnote:[Configuring multiple active MDS
|
||||
daemons http://docs.ceph.com/docs/mimic/cephfs/multimds/]
|
||||
daemons http://docs.ceph.com/docs/luminous/cephfs/multimds/]
|
||||
|
||||
[[pveceph_fs_create]]
|
||||
Create a CephFS
|
||||
@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ This creates a CephFS named `'cephfs'' using a pool for its data named
|
||||
Check the xref:pve_ceph_pools[{pve} managed Ceph pool chapter] or visit the
|
||||
Ceph documentation for more information regarding a fitting placement group
|
||||
number (`pg_num`) for your setup footnote:[Ceph Placement Groups
|
||||
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/mimic/rados/operations/placement-groups/].
|
||||
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/luminous/rados/operations/placement-groups/].
|
||||
Additionally, the `'--add-storage'' parameter will add the CephFS to the {pve}
|
||||
storage configuration after it was created successfully.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user