Add more documentation

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Wolfgang Bumiller 2019-06-06 14:45:05 +02:00
parent b873e5e2a5
commit 5bda38830c
3 changed files with 123 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -4,11 +4,19 @@ use serde_json::json;
use super::{ApiOutput, ApiType};
/// Helper trait to convert a variable into an API output.
///
/// If an API method returns a `String`, we want it to be jsonified into `{"data": result}` and
/// wrapped in a `http::Response` with a status code of `200`, but if an API method returns a
/// `http::Response`, we don't want that, our wrappers produced by the `#[api]` macro simply call
/// `output.into_api_output()`, and the trait implementation decides how to proceed.
pub trait IntoApiOutput<T> {
fn into_api_output(self) -> ApiOutput;
}
impl<T: ApiType + serde::Serialize> IntoApiOutput<()> for T {
/// By default, any serializable type is serialized into a `{"data": output}` json structure,
/// and returned as http status 200.
fn into_api_output(self) -> ApiOutput {
let output = serde_json::to_value(self)?;
let res = json!({ "data": output });
@ -21,12 +29,16 @@ impl<T: ApiType + serde::Serialize> IntoApiOutput<()> for T {
}
}
/// Methods returning `ApiOutput` (which is a `Result<http::Result<Bytes>, Error>`) don't need
/// anything to happen to the value anymore, return the result as is:
impl IntoApiOutput<ApiOutput> for ApiOutput {
fn into_api_output(self) -> ApiOutput {
self
}
}
/// Methods returning a `http::Response` (without the `Result<_, Error>` around it) need to be
/// wrapped in a `Result`, as we do apply a `?` operator on our methods.
impl IntoApiOutput<ApiOutput> for http::Response<bytes::Bytes> {
fn into_api_output(self) -> ApiOutput {
Ok(self)

View File

@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
use serde_json::Value;
/// Method entries in a `Router` are actually just `&dyn ApiMethodInfo` trait objects.
/// This contains all the info required to call, document, or command-line-complete parameters for
/// a method.
pub trait ApiMethodInfo {
fn description(&self) -> &'static str;
fn parameters(&self) -> &'static [Parameter];
@ -11,20 +14,32 @@ pub trait ApiMethodInfo {
fn handler(&self) -> fn(Value) -> super::ApiFuture;
}
/// Shortcut to not having to type it out. This function signature is just a dummy and not yet
/// stabalized!
pub type CompleteFn = fn(&str) -> Vec<String>;
/// Provides information about a method's parameter. Every parameter has a name and must be
/// documented with a description, type information, and optional constraints.
pub struct Parameter {
pub name: &'static str,
pub description: &'static str,
pub type_info: &'static TypeInfo,
}
/// Bare type info. Types themselves should also have a description, even if a method's parameter
/// usually overrides it. Ideally we can hyperlink the parameter to the type information in the
/// generated documentation.
pub struct TypeInfo {
pub name: &'static str,
pub description: &'static str,
pub complete_fn: Option<CompleteFn>,
}
/// Until we can slap `#[api]` onto all the functions we cann start translating our existing
/// `ApiMethod` structs to this new layout.
/// Otherwise this is mostly there so we can run the tests in the tests subdirectory without
/// depending on the api-macro crate. Tests using the macros belong into the api-macro crate itself
/// after all!
pub struct ApiMethod {
pub description: &'static str,
pub parameters: &'static [Parameter],

View File

@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
//! Proxmox API module. This provides utilities for HTTP and command line APIs.
//!
//! The main component here is the [`Router`] which is filled with entries pointing to
//! [`ApiMethodInfos`](crate::ApiMethodInfo).
//!
//! Note that you'll rarely need the [`Router`] type itself, as you'll most likely be creating them
//! with the `router` macro provided by the `proxmox-api-macro` crate.
use std::cell::Cell;
use std::collections::HashMap;
use std::future::Future;
@ -15,33 +23,63 @@ pub use api_output::*;
mod api_type;
pub use api_type::*;
/// Return type of an API method.
pub type ApiOutput = Result<Response<Bytes>, Error>;
pub type ApiFuture = Pin<Box<dyn Future<Output = ApiOutput>>>;
pub type ApiFn = Box<dyn Fn(Value) -> ApiFuture>;
/// Future type of an API method. In order to support `async fn` this is a pinned box.
pub type ApiFuture = Pin<Box<dyn Future<Output = ApiOutput>>>;
/// This enum specifies what to do when a subdirectory is requested from the current router.
///
/// For plain subdirectories a `Directories` entry is used.
///
/// When subdirectories are supposed to be passed as a `String` parameter to methods beneath the
/// current directory, a `Parameter` entry is used. Note that the parameter name is fixed at this
/// point, so all method calls beneath will receive a parameter ot that particular name.
pub enum SubRoute {
/// This is used for plain subdirectories.
Directories(HashMap<&'static str, Router>),
/// Match subdirectories as the given parameter name to the underlying router.
Parameter(&'static str, Box<Router>),
}
/// A router is a nested structure. On the one hand it contains HTTP method entries (`GET`, `PUT`,
/// ...), and on the other hand it contains sub directories. In some cases we want to match those
/// sub directories as parameters, so the nesting uses a `SubRoute` `enum` representing which of
/// the two is the case.
#[derive(Default)]
pub struct Router {
/// The `GET` http method.
pub get: Option<&'static dyn ApiMethodInfo>,
/// The `PUT` http method.
pub put: Option<&'static dyn ApiMethodInfo>,
/// The `POST` http method.
pub post: Option<&'static dyn ApiMethodInfo>,
/// The `DELETE` http method.
pub delete: Option<&'static dyn ApiMethodInfo>,
/// Specifies the behavior of sub directories. See [`SubRoute`].
pub subroute: Option<SubRoute>,
}
impl Router {
/// Create a new empty router.
pub fn new() -> Self {
Self::default()
}
/// Lookup a path in the router. Note that this returns a tuple: the router we ended up on
/// (providing methods and subdirectories available for the given path), and optionally a json
/// value containing all the matched parameters ([`SubRoute::Parameter`] subdirectories).
pub fn lookup<T: AsRef<str>>(&self, path: T) -> Option<(&Self, Option<Value>)> {
self.lookup_do(path.as_ref())
}
// The actual implementation taking the parameter as &str
fn lookup_do(&self, path: &str) -> Option<(&Self, Option<Value>)> {
let mut matched_params = None;
@ -69,6 +107,7 @@ impl Router {
Some((this, matched_params.map(Value::Object)))
}
/// Builder method to provide a `GET` method info.
pub fn get<I>(mut self, method: &'static I) -> Self
where
I: ApiMethodInfo,
@ -77,6 +116,7 @@ impl Router {
self
}
/// Builder method to provide a `PUT` method info.
pub fn put<I>(mut self, method: &'static I) -> Self
where
I: ApiMethodInfo,
@ -85,6 +125,7 @@ impl Router {
self
}
/// Builder method to provide a `POST` method info.
pub fn post<I>(mut self, method: &'static I) -> Self
where
I: ApiMethodInfo,
@ -93,6 +134,7 @@ impl Router {
self
}
/// Builder method to provide a `DELETE` method info.
pub fn delete<I>(mut self, method: &'static I) -> Self
where
I: ApiMethodInfo,
@ -101,7 +143,10 @@ impl Router {
self
}
// To be used statically, therefore we panic otherwise!
/// Builder method to make this router match the next subdirectory into a parameter.
///
/// This is supposed to be used statically (via `lazy_static!), therefore we panic if we
/// already have a subdir entry!
pub fn parameter_subdir(mut self, parameter_name: &'static str, router: Router) -> Self {
if self.subroute.is_some() {
panic!("match_parameter can only be used once and without sub directories");
@ -110,6 +155,10 @@ impl Router {
self
}
/// Builder method to add a regular directory entro to this router.
///
/// This is supposed to be used statically (via `lazy_static!), therefore we panic if we
/// already have a subdir entry!
pub fn subdir(mut self, dir_name: &'static str, router: Router) -> Self {
let previous = match self.subroute {
Some(SubRoute::Directories(ref mut map)) => map.insert(dir_name, router),
@ -139,15 +188,53 @@ impl Router {
/// While this is very useful for structural types, we sometimes to want to be able to pass a
/// simple unconstrainted type like a `String` with no restrictions, so most basic types implement
/// `ApiType` as well.
//
// FIXME: I've actually moved most of this into the types in `api_type.rs` now, so this is
// probably unused at this point?
// `verify` should be moved to `TypeInfo` (for the type related verifier), and `Parameter` should
// get an additional verify method for constraints added by *methods*.
//
// We actually have 2 layers of validation:
// When entering the API: The type validation
// obviously a `String` should also be a string in the json object...
// This does not happen when we call the method from rust-code as we have no json layer
// there.
// When entering the function: The input validation
// if the function says `Integer`, the type itself has no validation other than that it has
// to be an integer type, but the function may still say `minimum: 5, maximum: 10`.
// This should also happen for direct calls from within rust, the `#[api]` macro can take
// care of this.
// When leaving the function: The output validation
// Yep, we need to add this ;-)
pub trait ApiType {
/// API types need to provide a `TypeInfo`, providing details about the underlying type.
fn type_info() -> &'static TypeInfo;
/// Additionally, ApiTypes must provide a way to verify their constraints!
fn verify(&self) -> Result<(), Error>;
/// This is a workaround for when we cannot name the type but have an object available we can
/// call a method on. (We cannot call associated methods on objects without being able to write
/// out the type, and rust has some restrictions as to what types are available.)
// eg. nested generics:
// fn foo<T>() {
// fn bar<U>(x: &T) {
// cannot use T::method() here, but can use x.method()
// (compile error "can't use generic parameter of outer function",
// and yes, that's a stupid restriction as it is still completely static...)
// }
// }
fn get_type_info(&self) -> &'static TypeInfo {
Self::type_info()
}
}
/// Option types are supposed to wrap their underlying types with an `optional:` text in their
/// description.
// BUT it requires some anti-static magic. And while this looks like the result of lazy_static!,
// it's not exactly the same, lazy_static! here does not actually work as it'll curiously produce
// the same error as we pointed out above in the `get_type_info` method (as it does a lot more
// extra stuff we don't need)...
impl<T: ApiType> ApiType for Option<T> {
fn verify(&self) -> Result<(), Error> {
if let Some(inner) = self {
@ -183,6 +270,8 @@ impl<T: ApiType> ApiType for Option<T> {
}
}
/// Any `Result<T, Error>` of course gets the same info as `T`, since this only means that it can
/// fail...
impl<T: ApiType> ApiType for Result<T, Error> {
fn verify(&self) -> Result<(), Error> {
if let Ok(inner) = self {
@ -196,6 +285,10 @@ impl<T: ApiType> ApiType for Result<T, Error> {
}
}
/// This is not supposed to be used, but can be if needed. This will provide an empty `ApiType`
/// declaration with no description and no verifier.
///
/// This rarely makes sense, but sometimes a `string` is just a `string`.
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! unconstrained_api_type {
($type:ty $(, $more:ty)*) => {