fix an issue where the stop or restart button stays enabled for
elements in 'startOnlyServices' after switching selection from a
service that was not restricted to start-only
note: front-end change only as the backend already refused to stop a
start-only service.
Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
necessary for pbs. also give an option to use the type as url path
e.g. /config/access/<TYPE>/<ID>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
mostly copied from pve, but includes a realm displayeditfield
as well as the comment field
in contrast to the inputpanel in PVE, this is not extended
from a base input panel (where in pve the comment/realm/default/etc.
fields come from)
we do this, since not all products can define a default or tfa
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
added the following (necessary) changes:
* use Proxmox.Utils.authSchema
* omit the sync button/handler, but add a possibilty to add extra buttons
* check for an 'edit' property in the authSchema for enabling editing
* removed the onlineHelp property
* removed 'TFA' column (can be added by the caller)
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
like we do for the task_descriptions.
This way we can have a basic config that is true for all products
and override where necessary
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
basically a straight copy, with the exception that it references
Proxmox.Utils.authSchema instead of PVE.Utils.authSchema
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
The warning still shows up for the disabled repository itself, but
having a disabled repository with a bad suite is not problematic for
the configuration status as a whole.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
which avoids the all-caps "WARNINGS:" and uses the localized version.
The call was thrown out by the big overhaul in
9e059d560c.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
alows to make the code simpler too, but we need to instantiate the
selection model explicitly, as we use a bit of a weird layout here to
be able to show the pending changes at the bottom, if any, so the
main gridpanel is not the parent of the toolbar buttons, so the
std-remove button does not automatically finds the selection model
when searching in the parent
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
that does two things,
show the user that some filters are active (even if filters are collapsed),
and let the user to reset the filters all at once
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
since we use a buffered store on a grid, we cannot use our
normal monStoreErrors from Utils (The store on the grid is a memorystore
without our 'proxmox' proxy, and the store in the viewmodel is not
initialized yet in the init)
simply set the mask in the already existing 'updateLayout' function
which is exactly the right place for the buffered store load
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
since we use a remotefilter on a bufferedstore, the only event where
we can check if the selected element is still there is the 'refresh'
event. Simply deselect if the seleceted element is not in the store
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
No need then and if we'd call into update we'd still generate new
elements which is annoying for debugging and extra DOM work we can
avoid.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
not all of those are really problematic, but it's always easier to
start out stricter than required and see if any user even would use
those.
It seems that we should probably switch to a white-list approach...
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
The href, and in some browser also the src attrs on img, or a tags
can be made to execute JS rather easily, catch thoseand just remove
the attr if, after creating an URL object from it, it does not looks
like it's a http(s) request.
Further, filter out the style tag completely, as that can be misused
too, even if only to break cosmetics.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
As pruning means content an user wrote into the box, even if with
malicious intend, gets hidden and that can be quite confusing..
So rather get the outerHTML, transform it with ExtJS's htmlEncode and
set it again.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Anything where more instances can exist, even if only for a very
short time, must NOT use `id` as that needs to be unique in all
current instances of components/elements of the whole gui.
Here it broke most of the gui when switching between node, as the new
nodes repo gui was instantiated before the old ones was completely
destroyed, so there where (at least) two elements with the same id ->
💥 boom.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
