Patch series "Ignore non-LRU-based reclaim in memcg reclaim", v6.
Upon running some proactive reclaim tests using memory.reclaim, we noticed
some tests flaking where writing to memory.reclaim would be successful
even though we did not reclaim the requested amount fully Looking further
into it, I discovered that *sometimes* we overestimate the number of
reclaimed pages in memcg reclaim.
Reclaimed pages through other means than LRU-based reclaim are tracked
through reclaim_state in struct scan_control, which is stashed in current
task_struct. These pages are added to the number of reclaimed pages
through LRUs. For memcg reclaim, these pages generally cannot be linked
to the memcg under reclaim and can cause an overestimated count of
reclaimed pages. This short series tries to address that.
Patch 1 ignores pages reclaimed outside of LRU reclaim in memcg reclaim.
The pages are uncharged anyway, so even if we end up under-reporting
reclaimed pages we will still succeed in making progress during charging.
Patches 2-3 are just refactoring. Patch 2 moves set_reclaim_state()
helper next to flush_reclaim_state(). Patch 3 adds a helper that wraps
updating current->reclaim_state, and renames reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab
to reclaim_state->reclaimed.
This patch (of 3):
We keep track of different types of reclaimed pages through
reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab, and we add them to the reported number of
reclaimed pages. For non-memcg reclaim, this makes sense. For memcg
reclaim, we have no clue if those pages are charged to the memcg under
reclaim.
Slab pages are shared by different memcgs, so a freed slab page may have
only been partially charged to the memcg under reclaim. The same goes for
clean file pages from pruned inodes (on highmem systems) or xfs buffer
pages, there is no simple way to currently link them to the memcg under
reclaim.
Stop reporting those freed pages as reclaimed pages during memcg reclaim.
This should make the return value of writing to memory.reclaim, and may
help reduce unnecessary reclaim retries during memcg charging. Writing to
memory.reclaim on the root memcg is considered as cgroup_reclaim(), but
for this case we want to include any freed pages, so use the
global_reclaim() check instead of !cgroup_reclaim().
Generally, this should make the return value of
try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() more accurate. In some limited cases (e.g.
freed a slab page that was mostly charged to the memcg under reclaim),
the return value of try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() can be underestimated,
but this should be fine. The freed pages will be uncharged anyway, and we
can charge the memcg the next time around as we usually do memcg reclaim
in a retry loop.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230413104034.1086717-1-yosryahmed@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230413104034.1086717-2-yosryahmed@google.com
Fixes: f2fe7b09a5 ("mm: memcg/slab: charge individual slab objects
instead of pages")
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
583c27a167