Edward Cree 545722cb0f selftests/bpf: subtraction bounds test ... There is a bug in the verifier's handling of BPF_SUB: [a,b] - [c,d] yields was [a-c, b-d] rather than the correct [a-d, b-c]. So here is a test which, with the bogus handling, will produce ranges of [0,0] and thus allowed accesses; whereas the correct handling will give a range of [-255, 255] (and hence the right-shift will give a range of [0, 255]) and the accesses will be rejected. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>		2017-07-24 14:02:55 -07:00
..
fault-injection	fault-injection: fix failcmd.sh warning	2012-07-31 18:42:38 -07:00
ktest	Greg Kroah-Hartman reported to me that the ktest of v4.10 locked up in an	2017-03-08 11:06:05 -08:00
nvdimm	tools/testing/nvdimm: fix nfit_test buffer overflow	2017-06-15 14:31:41 -07:00
radix-tree	radix tree test suite: Specify -m32 in LDFLAGS too	2017-03-07 13:18:24 -05:00
selftests	selftests/bpf: subtraction bounds test	2017-07-24 14:02:55 -07:00