The DPHY timings are currently hard coded. Since the input
clock can be variable, the phy timings need to be variable
too. To facilitate this, we need to cache the hs_clock
based on what is generated from the PLL.
The phy_mipi_dphy_get_default_config_for_hsclk function
configures the DPHY timings in pico-seconds, and a small macro
converts those timings into clock cycles based on the hs_clk.
Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Tested-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> # imx8mm-icore
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230526030559.326566-6-aford173@gmail.com
According to Table 13-45 of the i.MX8M Mini Reference Manual, the min
and max values for M and the frequency range for the VCO_out
calculator were incorrect. This information was contradicted in other
parts of the mini, nano and plus manuals. After reaching out to my
NXP Rep, when confronting him about discrepencies in the Nano manual,
he responded with:
"Yes it is definitely wrong, the one that is part
of the NOTE in MIPI_DPHY_M_PLLPMS register table against PMS_P,
PMS_M and PMS_S is not correct. I will report this to Doc team,
the one customer should be take into account is the Table 13-40
DPHY PLL Parameters and the Note above."
These updated values also match what is used in the NXP downstream
kernel.
To fix this, make new variables to hold the min and max values of m
and the minimum value of VCO_out, and update the PMS calculator to
use these new variables instead of using hard-coded values to keep
the backwards compatibility with other parts using this driver.
Fixes: 4d562c70c4 ("drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Add i.MX8M Mini/Nano support")
Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Tested-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> # imx8mm-icore
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230526030559.326566-3-aford173@gmail.com
Implement support for DSI clock and data lane DN/DP polarity swap by
means of decoding 'lane-polarities' DT property. The controller does
support DN/DP swap of clock lane and all data lanes, the controller
does not support polarity swap of individual data lane bundles, add
a check which verifies all data lanes have the same polarity.
This has been validated on an imx8mm board that actually has the MIPI DSI
clock lanes inverted.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230514114625.98372-2-festevam@gmail.com
Add extras to support i.MX8M Plus. The main change is the removal of
HS/VS/DE signal inversion in the LCDIFv3-DSIM glue logic, otherwise
the implementation of this IP in i.MX8M Plus is very much compatible
with the i.MX8M Mini/Nano one.
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Acked-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Samsung MIPI DSIM controller is common DSI IP that can be used in various
SoCs like Exynos, i.MX8M Mini/Nano.
In order to access this DSI controller between various platform SoCs,
the ideal way to incorporate this in the drm stack is via the drm bridge
driver.
We already have a consolidated code for supporting component and bridge
based DRM drivers, so keep the exynos component based code in existing
exynos_drm_dsi.c and move generic bridge code as part of samsung-dsim.c
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
