Rename pr_efi to efi_info and pr_efi_err to efi_err to make it more
obvious that they are part of the EFI stub and not generic printk infra.
Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200430182843.2510180-4-nivedita@alum.mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
The practice of using __pure getter functions to access global
variables in the EFI stub dates back to the time when we had to
carefully prevent GOT entries from being emitted, because we
could not rely on the toolchain to do this for us.
Today, we use the hidden visibility pragma for all EFI stub source
files, which now all live in the same subdirectory, and we apply a
sanity check on the objects, so we can get rid of these getter
functions and simply refer to global data objects directly.
So switch over the remaining boolean variables carrying options set
on the kernel command line.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
The practice of using __pure getter functions to access global
variables in the EFI stub dates back to the time when we had to
carefully prevent GOT entries from being emitted, because we
could not rely on the toolchain to do this for us.
Today, we use the hidden visibility pragma for all EFI stub source
files, which now all live in the same subdirectory, and we apply a
sanity check on the objects, so we can get rid of these getter
functions and simply refer to global data objects directly.
Start with efi_system_table(), and convert it into a global variable.
While at it, make it a pointer-to-const, because we can.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Now that both arm and x86 are using the linker script to place the EFI
stub's global variables in the correct section, remove __efistub_global.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200416151227.3360778-4-nivedita@alum.mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c:68:6: warning:
symbol 'install_memreserve_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1587643713-28169-1-git-send-email-zou_wei@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Most of the arm-stub code is written in an architecture independent manner.
As a result, RISC-V can reuse most of the arm-stub code.
Rename the arm-stub.c to efi-stub.c so that ARM, ARM64 and RISC-V can use it.
This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200415195422.19866-2-atish.patra@wdc.com
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
