Remove duplicated BTF parsing logic when it comes to subprog call check.
Instead, use (potentially cached) results of btf_prepare_func_args() to
abstract away expectations of each subprog argument in generic terms
(e.g., "this is pointer to context", or "this is a pointer to memory of
size X"), and then use those simple high-level argument type
expectations to validate actual register states to check if they match
expectations.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subprog call logic in btf_check_subprog_call() currently has both a lot
of BTF parsing logic (which is, presumably, what justified putting it
into btf.c), but also a bunch of register state checks, some of each
utilize deep verifier logic helpers, necessarily exported from
verifier.c: check_ptr_off_reg(), check_func_arg_reg_off(),
and check_mem_reg().
Going forward, btf_check_subprog_call() will have a minimum of
BTF-related logic, but will get more internal verifier logic related to
register state manipulation. So move it into verifier.c to minimize
amount of verifier-specific logic exposed to btf.c.
We do this move before refactoring btf_check_func_arg_match() to
preserve as much history post-refactoring as possible.
No functional changes.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Generalize btf_prepare_func_args() to support both global and static
subprogs. We are going to utilize this property in the next patch,
reusing btf_prepare_func_args() for subprog call logic instead of
reparsing BTF information in a completely separate implementation.
btf_prepare_func_args() now detects whether subprog is global or static
makes slight logic adjustments for static func cases, like not failing
fatally (-EFAULT) for conditions that are allowable for static subprogs.
Somewhat subtle (but major!) difference is the handling of pointer arguments.
Both global and static functions need to handle special context
arguments (which are pointers to predefined type names), but static
subprogs give up on any other pointers, falling back to marking subprog
as "unreliable", disabling the use of BTF type information altogether.
For global functions, though, we are assuming that such pointers to
unrecognized types are just pointers to fixed-sized memory region (or
error out if size cannot be established, like for `void *` pointers).
This patch accommodates these small differences and sets up a stage for
refactoring in the next patch, eliminating a separate BTF-based parsing
logic in btf_check_func_arg_match().
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Instead of btf_check_subprog_arg_match(), use btf_prepare_func_args()
logic to validate "trustworthiness" of main BPF program's BTF information,
if it is present.
We ignored results of original BTF check anyway, often times producing
confusing and ominously-sounding "reg type unsupported for arg#0
function" message, which has no apparent effect on program correctness
and verification process.
All the -EFAULT returning sanity checks are already performed in
check_btf_info_early(), so there is zero reason to have this duplication
of logic between btf_check_subprog_call() and btf_check_subprog_arg_match().
Dropping btf_check_subprog_arg_match() simplifies
btf_check_func_arg_match() further removing `bool processing_call` flag.
One subtle bit that was done by btf_check_subprog_arg_match() was
potentially marking main program's BTF as unreliable. We do this
explicitly now with a dedicated simple check, preserving the original
behavior, but now based on well factored btf_prepare_func_args() logic.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
btf_prepare_func_args() is used to understand expectations and
restrictions on global subprog arguments. But current implementation is
hard to extend, as it intermixes BTF-based func prototype parsing and
interpretation logic with setting up register state at subprog entry.
Worse still, those registers are not completely set up inside
btf_prepare_func_args(), requiring some more logic later in
do_check_common(). Like calling mark_reg_unknown() and similar
initialization operations.
This intermixing of BTF interpretation and register state setup is
problematic. First, it causes duplication of BTF parsing logic for global
subprog verification (to set up initial state of global subprog) and
global subprog call sites analysis (when we need to check that whatever
is being passed into global subprog matches expectations), performed in
btf_check_subprog_call().
Given we want to extend global func argument with tags later, this
duplication is problematic. So refactor btf_prepare_func_args() to do
only BTF-based func proto and args parsing, returning high-level
argument "expectations" only, with no regard to specifics of register
state. I.e., if it's a context argument, instead of setting register
state to PTR_TO_CTX, we return ARG_PTR_TO_CTX enum for that argument as
"an argument specification" for further processing inside
do_check_common(). Similarly for SCALAR arguments, PTR_TO_MEM, etc.
This allows to reuse btf_prepare_func_args() in following patches at
global subprog call site analysis time. It also keeps register setup
code consistently in one place, do_check_common().
Besides all this, we cache this argument specs information inside
env->subprog_info, eliminating the need to redo these potentially
expensive BTF traversals, especially if BPF program's BTF is big and/or
there are lots of global subprog calls.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
We can derive some new information for BPF_JNE in regs_refine_cond_op().
Take following code for example:
/* The type of "a" is u32 */
if (a > 0 && a < 100) {
/* the range of the register for a is [0, 99], not [1, 99],
* and will cause the following error:
*
* invalid zero-sized read
*
* as a can be 0.
*/
bpf_skb_store_bytes(skb, xx, xx, a, 0);
}
In the code above, "a > 0" will be compiled to "jmp xxx if a == 0". In the
TRUE branch, the dst_reg will be marked as known to 0. However, in the
fallthrough(FALSE) branch, the dst_reg will not be handled, which makes
the [min, max] for a is [0, 99], not [1, 99].
For BPF_JNE, we can reduce the range of the dst reg if the src reg is a
const and is exactly the edge of the dst reg.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231219134800.1550388-2-menglong8.dong@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
It is safe to always start with imprecise SCALAR_VALUE register.
Previously __mark_reg_const_zero() relied on caller to reset precise
mark, but it's very error prone and we already missed it in a few
places. So instead make __mark_reg_const_zero() reset precision always,
as it's a safe default for SCALAR_VALUE. Explanation is basically the
same as for why we are resetting (or rather not setting) precision in
current state. If necessary, precision propagation will set it to
precise correctly.
As such, also remove a big comment about forward precision propagation
in mark_reg_stack_read() and avoid unnecessarily setting precision to
true after reading from STACK_ZERO stack. Again, precision propagation
will correctly handle this, if that SCALAR_VALUE register will ever be
needed to be precise.
Reported-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231218173601.53047-1-andrii@kernel.org
This patch adds a comment to check_mem_size_reg -- a function whose
meaning is not very transparent. The function implicitly deals with two
registers connected by convention, which is not obvious.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231210225149.67639-1-andreimatei1@gmail.com
The function are defined in the verifier.c file, but not called
elsewhere, so delete the unused function.
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3448:20: warning: unused function 'bt_set_slot'
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3453:20: warning: unused function 'bt_clear_slot'
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3488:20: warning: unused function 'bt_is_slot_set'
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231212005436.103829-1-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com
Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=7714
Use the fact that we are passing subprog index around and have
a corresponding struct bpf_subprog_info in bpf_verifier_env for each
subprogram. We don't need to separately pass around a flag whether
subprog is exception callback or not, each relevant verifier function
can determine this using provided subprog index if we maintain
bpf_subprog_info properly.
Also move out exception callback-specific logic from
btf_prepare_func_args(), keeping it generic. We can enforce all these
restriction right before exception callback verification pass. We add
out parameter, arg_cnt, for now, but this will be unnecessary with
subsequent refactoring and will be removed.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204233931.49758-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When verifier validates BPF_ST_MEM instruction that stores known
constant to stack (e.g., *(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = 123), it effectively spills
a fake register with a constant (but initially imprecise) value to
a stack slot. Because read-side logic treats it as a proper register
fill from stack slot, we need to mark such stack slot initialization as
INSN_F_STACK_ACCESS instruction to stop precision backtracking from
missing it.
Fixes: 41f6f64e69 ("bpf: support non-r10 register spill/fill to/from stack in precision tracking")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231209010958.66758-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Push the rounding up of stack offsets into the function responsible for
growing the stack, rather than relying on all the callers to do it.
Uncertainty about whether the callers did it or not tripped up people in
a previous review.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208032519.260451-4-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Privileged programs are supposed to be able to read uninitialized stack
memory (ever since 6715df8d5) but, before this patch, these accesses
were permitted inconsistently. In particular, accesses were permitted
above state->allocated_stack, but not below it. In other words, if the
stack was already "large enough", the access was permitted, but
otherwise the access was rejected instead of being allowed to "grow the
stack". This undesired rejection was happening in two places:
- in check_stack_slot_within_bounds()
- in check_stack_range_initialized()
This patch arranges for these accesses to be permitted. A bunch of tests
that were relying on the old rejection had to change; all of them were
changed to add also run unprivileged, in which case the old behavior
persists. One tests couldn't be updated - global_func16 - because it
can't run unprivileged for other reasons.
This patch also fixes the tracking of the stack size for variable-offset
reads. This second fix is bundled in the same commit as the first one
because they're inter-related. Before this patch, writes to the stack
using registers containing a variable offset (as opposed to registers
with fixed, known values) were not properly contributing to the
function's needed stack size. As a result, it was possible for a program
to verify, but then to attempt to read out-of-bounds data at runtime
because a too small stack had been allocated for it.
Each function tracks the size of the stack it needs in
bpf_subprog_info.stack_depth, which is maintained by
update_stack_depth(). For regular memory accesses, check_mem_access()
was calling update_state_depth() but it was passing in only the fixed
part of the offset register, ignoring the variable offset. This was
incorrect; the minimum possible value of that register should be used
instead.
This tracking is now fixed by centralizing the tracking of stack size in
grow_stack_state(), and by lifting the calls to grow_stack_state() to
check_stack_access_within_bounds() as suggested by Andrii. The code is
now simpler and more convincingly tracks the correct maximum stack size.
check_stack_range_initialized() can now rely on enough stack having been
allocated for the access; this helps with the fix for the first issue.
A few tests were changed to also check the stack depth computation. The
one that fails without this patch is verifier_var_off:stack_write_priv_vs_unpriv.
Fixes: 01f810ace9 ("bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access")
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208032519.260451-3-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABWLsev9g8UP_c3a=1qbuZUi20tGoUXoU07FPf-5FLvhOKOY+Q@mail.gmail.com/
This patch promotes the arithmetic around checking stack bounds to be
done in the 64-bit domain, instead of the current 32bit. The arithmetic
implies adding together a 64-bit register with a int offset. The
register was checked to be below 1<<29 when it was variable, but not
when it was fixed. The offset either comes from an instruction (in which
case it is 16 bit), from another register (in which case the caller
checked it to be below 1<<29 [1]), or from the size of an argument to a
kfunc (in which case it can be a u32 [2]). Between the register being
inconsistently checked to be below 1<<29, and the offset being up to an
u32, it appears that we were open to overflowing the `int`s which were
currently used for arithmetic.
[1] 815fb87b75/kernel/bpf/verifier.c (L7494-L7498)
[2] 815fb87b75/kernel/bpf/verifier.c (L11904)
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231207041150.229139-4-andreimatei1@gmail.com
This patch fixes a bug around the verification of possibly-zero-sized
stack accesses. When the access was done through a var-offset stack
pointer, check_stack_access_within_bounds was incorrectly computing the
maximum-offset of a zero-sized read to be the same as the register's min
offset. Instead, we have to take in account the register's maximum
possible value. The patch also simplifies how the max offset is checked;
the check is now simpler than for min offset.
The bug was allowing accesses to erroneously pass the
check_stack_access_within_bounds() checks, only to later crash in
check_stack_range_initialized() when all the possibly-affected stack
slots are iterated (this time with a correct max offset).
check_stack_range_initialized() is relying on
check_stack_access_within_bounds() for its accesses to the
stack-tracking vector to be within bounds; in the case of zero-sized
accesses, we were essentially only verifying that the lowest possible
slot was within bounds. We would crash when the max-offset of the stack
pointer was >= 0 (which shouldn't pass verification, and hopefully is
not something anyone's code attempts to do in practice).
Thanks Hao for reporting!
Fixes: 01f810ace9 ("bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access")
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231207041150.229139-2-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsZGEUaRCHsmaX=h-efVogsRfK1FPxmkgb0Os_frnHiNdw@mail.gmail.com/
Remove remaining direct queries to perfmon_capable() and bpf_capable()
in BPF verifier logic and instead use BPF token (if available) to make
decisions about privileges.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-9-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Similar to special handling of STACK_ZERO, when reading 1/2/4 bytes from
stack from slot that has register spilled into it and that register has
a constant value zero, preserve that zero and mark spilled register as
precise for that. This makes spilled const zero register and STACK_ZERO
cases equivalent in their behavior.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-7-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Instead of always forcing STACK_ZERO slots to STACK_MISC, preserve it in
situations where this is possible. E.g., when spilling register as
1/2/4-byte subslots on the stack, all the remaining bytes in the stack
slot do not automatically become unknown. If we knew they contained
zeroes, we can preserve those STACK_ZERO markers.
Add a helper mark_stack_slot_misc(), similar to scrub_spilled_slot(),
but that doesn't overwrite either STACK_INVALID nor STACK_ZERO. Note
that we need to take into account possibility of being in unprivileged
mode, in which case STACK_INVALID is forced to STACK_MISC for correctness,
as treating STACK_INVALID as equivalent STACK_MISC is only enabled in
privileged mode.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When register is spilled onto a stack as a 1/2/4-byte register, we set
slot_type[BPF_REG_SIZE - 1] (plus potentially few more below it,
depending on actual spill size). So to check if some stack slot has
spilled register we need to consult slot_type[7], not slot_type[0].
To avoid the need to remember and double-check this in the future, just
use is_spilled_reg() helper.
Fixes: 27113c59b6 ("bpf: Check the other end of slot_type for STACK_SPILL")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Use instruction (jump) history to record instructions that performed
register spill/fill to/from stack, regardless if this was done through
read-only r10 register, or any other register after copying r10 into it
*and* potentially adjusting offset.
To make this work reliably, we push extra per-instruction flags into
instruction history, encoding stack slot index (spi) and stack frame
number in extra 10 bit flags we take away from prev_idx in instruction
history. We don't touch idx field for maximum performance, as it's
checked most frequently during backtracking.
This change removes basically the last remaining practical limitation of
precision backtracking logic in BPF verifier. It fixes known
deficiencies, but also opens up new opportunities to reduce number of
verified states, explored in the subsequent patches.
There are only three differences in selftests' BPF object files
according to veristat, all in the positive direction (less states).
File Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) States (A) States (B) States (DIFF)
-------------------------------------- ------------- --------- --------- ------------- ---------- ---------- -------------
test_cls_redirect_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o cls_redirect 2987 2864 -123 (-4.12%) 240 231 -9 (-3.75%)
xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o syncookie_tc 82848 82661 -187 (-0.23%) 5107 5073 -34 (-0.67%)
xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o syncookie_xdp 85116 84964 -152 (-0.18%) 5162 5130 -32 (-0.62%)
Note, I avoided renaming jmp_history to more generic insn_hist to
minimize number of lines changed and potential merge conflicts between
bpf and bpf-next trees.
Notice also cur_hist_entry pointer reset to NULL at the beginning of
instruction verification loop. This pointer avoids the problem of
relying on last jump history entry's insn_idx to determine whether we
already have entry for current instruction or not. It can happen that we
added jump history entry because current instruction is_jmp_point(), but
also we need to add instruction flags for stack access. In this case, we
don't want to entries, so we need to reuse last added entry, if it is
present.
Relying on insn_idx comparison has the same ambiguity problem as the one
that was fixed recently in [0], so we avoid that.
[0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20231110002638.4168352-3-andrii@kernel.org/
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Tao Lyu <tao.lyu@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When removing the inner map from the outer map, the inner map will be
freed after one RCU grace period and one RCU tasks trace grace
period, so it is certain that the bpf program, which may access the
inner map, has exited before the inner map is freed.
However there is no need to wait for one RCU tasks trace grace period if
the outer map is only accessed by non-sleepable program. So adding
sleepable_refcnt in bpf_map and increasing sleepable_refcnt when adding
the outer map into env->used_maps for sleepable program. Although the
max number of bpf program is INT_MAX - 1, the number of bpf programs
which are being loaded may be greater than INT_MAX, so using atomic64_t
instead of atomic_t for sleepable_refcnt. When removing the inner map
from the outer map, using sleepable_refcnt to decide whether or not a
RCU tasks trace grace period is needed before freeing the inner map.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-6-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Given we enforce a valid range for program and async callback return
value, we must mark R0 as precise to avoid incorrect state pruning.
Fixes: b5dc0163d8 ("bpf: precise scalar_value tracking")
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-9-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Use common logic to verify program return values and async callback
return values. This allows to avoid duplication of any extra steps
necessary, like precision marking, which will be added in the next
patch.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-8-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Similarly to subprog/callback logic, enforce return value of BPF program
using more precise smin/smax range.
We need to adjust a bunch of tests due to a changed format of an error
message.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-7-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Instead of relying on potentially imprecise tnum representation of
expected return value range for callbacks and subprogs, validate that
smin/smax range satisfy exact expected range of return values.
E.g., if callback would need to return [0, 2] range, tnum can't
represent this precisely and instead will allow [0, 3] range. By
checking smin/smax range, we can make sure that subprog/callback indeed
returns only valid [0, 2] range.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Given verifier checks actual value, r0 has to be precise, so we need to
propagate precision properly. r0 also has to be marked as read,
otherwise subsequent state comparisons will ignore such register as
unimportant and precision won't really help here.
Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Slightly change BPF verifier logic around eagerness and order of global
subprog validation. Instead of going over every global subprog eagerly
and validating it before main (entry) BPF program is verified, turn it
around. Validate main program first, mark subprogs that were called from
main program for later verification, but otherwise assume it is valid.
Afterwards, go over marked global subprogs and validate those,
potentially marking some more global functions as being called. Continue
this process until all (transitively) callable global subprogs are
validated. It's a BFS traversal at its heart and will always converge.
This is an important change because it allows to feature-gate some
subprograms that might not be verifiable on some older kernel, depending
on supported set of features.
E.g., at some point, global functions were allowed to accept a pointer
to memory, which size is identified by user-provided type.
Unfortunately, older kernels don't support this feature. With BPF CO-RE
approach, the natural way would be to still compile BPF object file once
and guard calls to this global subprog with some CO-RE check or using
.rodata variables. That's what people do to guard usage of new helpers
or kfuncs, and any other new BPF-side feature that might be missing on
old kernels.
That's currently impossible to do with global subprogs, unfortunately,
because they are eagerly and unconditionally validated. This patch set
aims to change this, so that in the future when global funcs gain new
features, those can be guarded using BPF CO-RE techniques in the same
fashion as any other new kernel feature.
Two selftests had to be adjusted in sync with these changes.
test_global_func12 relied on eager global subprog validation failing
before main program failure is detected (unknown return value). Fix by
making sure that main program is always valid.
verifier_subprog_precision's parent_stack_slot_precise subtest relied on
verifier checkpointing heuristic to do a checkpoint at instruction #5,
but that's no longer true because we don't have enough jumps validated
before reaching insn #5 due to global subprogs being validated later.
Other than that, no changes, as one would expect.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231124035937.403208-3-andrii@kernel.org
We have the name, instead of emitting just func#N to identify global
subprog, augment verifier log messages with actual function name to make
it more user-friendly.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231124035937.403208-2-andrii@kernel.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEABYIAB0WIQTFp0I1jqZrAX+hPRXbK58LschIgwUCZV0kjgAKCRDbK58LschI
gy0EAP9XwncW2OhO72DpITluFzvWPgB0N97OANKBXjzKJrRAlQD/aUe9nlvBQuad
WsbMKLeC4wvI2X/4PEIR4ukbuZ3ypAA=
=LMVg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2023-11-21
We've added 85 non-merge commits during the last 12 day(s) which contain
a total of 63 files changed, 4464 insertions(+), 1484 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Huge batch of verifier changes to improve BPF register bounds logic
and range support along with a large test suite, and verifier log
improvements, all from Andrii Nakryiko.
2) Add a new kfunc which acquires the associated cgroup of a task within
a specific cgroup v1 hierarchy where the latter is identified by its id,
from Yafang Shao.
3) Extend verifier to allow bpf_refcount_acquire() of a map value field
obtained via direct load which is a use-case needed in sched_ext,
from Dave Marchevsky.
4) Fix bpf_get_task_stack() helper to add the correct crosstask check
for the get_perf_callchain(), from Jordan Rome.
5) Fix BPF task_iter internals where lockless usage of next_thread()
was wrong. The rework also simplifies the code, from Oleg Nesterov.
6) Fix uninitialized tail padding via LIBBPF_OPTS_RESET, and another
fix for certain BPF UAPI structs to fix verifier failures seen
in bpf_dynptr usage, from Yonghong Song.
7) Add BPF selftest fixes for map_percpu_stats flakes due to per-CPU BPF
memory allocator not being able to allocate per-CPU pointer successfully,
from Hou Tao.
8) Add prep work around dynptr and string handling for kfuncs which
is later going to be used by file verification via BPF LSM and fsverity,
from Song Liu.
9) Improve BPF selftests to update multiple prog_tests to use ASSERT_*
macros, from Yuran Pereira.
10) Optimize LPM trie lookup to check prefixlen before walking the trie,
from Florian Lehner.
11) Consolidate virtio/9p configs from BPF selftests in config.vm file
given they are needed consistently across archs, from Manu Bretelle.
12) Small BPF verifier refactor to remove register_is_const(),
from Shung-Hsi Yu.
* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (85 commits)
selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in vmlinux
selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bpf_obj_id
selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bind_perm
selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bpf_tcp_ca
selftests/bpf: reduce verboseness of reg_bounds selftest logs
bpf: bpf_iter_task_next: use next_task(kit->task) rather than next_task(kit->pos)
bpf: bpf_iter_task_next: use __next_thread() rather than next_thread()
bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: use __next_thread() rather than next_thread()
bpf: emit frameno for PTR_TO_STACK regs if it differs from current one
bpf: smarter verifier log number printing logic
bpf: omit default off=0 and imm=0 in register state log
bpf: emit map name in register state if applicable and available
bpf: print spilled register state in stack slot
bpf: extract register state printing
bpf: move verifier state printing code to kernel/bpf/log.c
bpf: move verbose_linfo() into kernel/bpf/log.c
bpf: rename BPF_F_TEST_SANITY_STRICT to BPF_F_TEST_REG_INVARIANTS
bpf: Remove test for MOVSX32 with offset=32
selftests/bpf: add iter test requiring range x range logic
veristat: add ability to set BPF_F_TEST_SANITY_STRICT flag with -r flag
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231122000500.28126-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
In some cases verifier can't infer convergence of the bpf_loop()
iteration. E.g. for the following program:
static int cb(__u32 idx, struct num_context* ctx)
{
ctx->i++;
return 0;
}
SEC("?raw_tp")
int prog(void *_)
{
struct num_context ctx = { .i = 0 };
__u8 choice_arr[2] = { 0, 1 };
bpf_loop(2, cb, &ctx, 0);
return choice_arr[ctx.i];
}
Each 'cb' simulation would eventually return to 'prog' and reach
'return choice_arr[ctx.i]' statement. At which point ctx.i would be
marked precise, thus forcing verifier to track multitude of separate
states with {.i=0}, {.i=1}, ... at bpf_loop() callback entry.
This commit allows "brute force" handling for such cases by limiting
number of callback body simulations using 'umax' value of the first
bpf_loop() parameter.
For this, extend bpf_func_state with 'callback_depth' field.
Increment this field when callback visiting state is pushed to states
traversal stack. For frame #N it's 'callback_depth' field counts how
many times callback with frame depth N+1 had been executed.
Use bpf_func_state specifically to allow independent tracking of
callback depths when multiple nested bpf_loop() calls are present.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-11-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Callbacks are similar to open coded iterators, so add imprecise
widening logic for callback body processing. This makes callback based
loops behave identically to open coded iterators, e.g. allowing to
verify programs like below:
struct ctx { u32 i; };
int cb(u32 idx, struct ctx* ctx)
{
++ctx->i;
return 0;
}
...
struct ctx ctx = { .i = 0 };
bpf_loop(100, cb, &ctx, 0);
...
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-9-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Prior to this patch callbacks were handled as regular function calls,
execution of callback body was modeled exactly once.
This patch updates callbacks handling logic as follows:
- introduces a function push_callback_call() that schedules callback
body verification in env->head stack;
- updates prepare_func_exit() to reschedule callback body verification
upon BPF_EXIT;
- as calls to bpf_*_iter_next(), calls to callback invoking functions
are marked as checkpoints;
- is_state_visited() is updated to stop callback based iteration when
some identical parent state is found.
Paths with callback function invoked zero times are now verified first,
which leads to necessity to modify some selftests:
- the following negative tests required adding release/unlock/drop
calls to avoid previously masked unrelated error reports:
- cb_refs.c:underflow_prog
- exceptions_fail.c:reject_rbtree_add_throw
- exceptions_fail.c:reject_with_cp_reference
- the following precision tracking selftests needed change in expected
log trace:
- verifier_subprog_precision.c:callback_result_precise
(note: r0 precision is no longer propagated inside callback and
I think this is a correct behavior)
- verifier_subprog_precision.c:parent_callee_saved_reg_precise_with_callback
- verifier_subprog_precision.c:parent_stack_slot_precise_with_callback
Reported-by: Andrew Werner <awerner32@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CA+vRuzPChFNXmouzGG+wsy=6eMcfr1mFG0F3g7rbg-sedGKW3w@mail.gmail.com/
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-7-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Move code for simulated stack frame creation to a separate utility
function. This function would be used in the follow-up change for
callbacks handling.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-6-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Split check_reg_arg() into two utility functions:
- check_reg_arg() operating on registers from current verifier state;
- __check_reg_arg() operating on a specific set of registers passed as
a parameter;
The __check_reg_arg() function would be used by a follow-up change for
callbacks handling.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-5-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Move a good chunk of code from verifier.c to log.c: verifier state
verbose printing logic. This is an important and very much
logging/debugging oriented code. It fits the overlall log.c's focus on
verifier logging, and moving it allows to keep growing it without
unnecessarily adding to verifier.c code that otherwise contains a core
verification logic.
There are not many shared dependencies between this code and the rest of
verifier.c code, except a few single-line helpers for various register
type checks and a bit of state "scratching" helpers. We move all such
trivial helpers into include/bpf/bpf_verifier.h as static inlines.
No functional changes in this patch.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231118034623.3320920-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
verifier.c is huge. Let's try to move out parts that are logging-related
into log.c, as we previously did with bpf_log() and other related stuff.
This patch moves line info verbose output routines: it's pretty
self-contained and isolated code, so there is no problem with this.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231118034623.3320920-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This change doesn't seem to have any effect on selftests and production
BPF object files, but we preemptively try to make it more robust.
First, "learn sign from signed bounds" comment is misleading, as we are
learning not just sign, but also values.
Second, we simplify the check for determining whether entire range is
positive or negative similarly to other checks added earlier, using
appropriate u32/u64 cast and single comparisons. As explain in comments
in __reg64_deduce_bounds(), the checks are equivalent.
Last but not least, smin/smax and s32_min/s32_max reassignment based on
min/max of both umin/umax and smin/smax (and 32-bit equivalents) is hard
to explain and justify. We are updating unsigned bounds from signed
bounds, why would we update signed bounds at the same time? This might
be correct, but it's far from obvious why and the code or comments don't
try to justify this. Given we've added a separate deduction of signed
bounds from unsigned bounds earlier, this seems at least redundant, if
not just wrong.
In short, we remove doubtful pieces, and streamline the rest to follow
the logic and approach of the rest of reg_bounds_sync() checks.
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231112010609.848406-7-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Equivalent checks were recently added in more succinct and, arguably,
safer form in:
- f188765f23a5 ("bpf: derive smin32/smax32 from umin32/umax32 bounds");
- 2e74aef782d3 ("bpf: derive smin/smax from umin/max bounds").
The checks we are removing in this patch set do similar checks to detect
if entire u32/u64 range has signed bit set or not set, but does it with
two separate checks.
Further, we forcefully overwrite either smin or smax (and 32-bit equvalents)
without applying normal min/max intersection logic. It's not clear why
that would be correct in all cases and seems to work by accident. This
logic is also "gated" by previous signed -> unsigned derivation, which
returns early.
All this is quite confusing and seems error-prone, while we already have
at least equivalent checks happening earlier. So remove this duplicate
and error-prone logic to simplify things a bit.
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231112010609.848406-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add simple sanity checks that validate well-formed ranges (min <= max)
across u64, s64, u32, and s32 ranges. Also for cases when the value is
constant (either 64-bit or 32-bit), we validate that ranges and tnums
are in agreement.
These bounds checks are performed at the end of BPF_ALU/BPF_ALU64
operations, on conditional jumps, and for LDX instructions (where subreg
zero/sign extension is probably the most important to check). This
covers most of the interesting cases.
Also, we validate the sanity of the return register when manually
adjusting it for some special helpers.
By default, sanity violation will trigger a warning in verifier log and
resetting register bounds to "unbounded" ones. But to aid development
and debugging, BPF_F_TEST_SANITY_STRICT flag is added, which will
trigger hard failure of verification with -EFAULT on register bounds
violations. This allows selftests to catch such issues. veristat will
also gain a CLI option to enable this behavior.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231112010609.848406-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Use 32-bit subranges to prune some 64-bit BPF_JEQ/BPF_JNE conditions
that otherwise would be "inconclusive" (i.e., is_branch_taken() would
return -1). This can happen, for example, when registers are initialized
as 64-bit u64/s64, then compared for inequality as 32-bit subregisters,
and then followed by 64-bit equality/inequality check. That 32-bit
inequality can establish some pattern for lower 32 bits of a register
(e.g., s< 0 condition determines whether the bit #31 is zero or not),
while overall 64-bit value could be anything (according to a value range
representation).
This is not a fancy quirky special case, but actually a handling that's
necessary to prevent correctness issue with BPF verifier's range
tracking: set_range_min_max() assumes that register ranges are
non-overlapping, and if that condition is not guaranteed by
is_branch_taken() we can end up with invalid ranges, where min > max.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsY2q1_fUohD7hRmKGqv1MV=eP2f6XK8kjkYNw7BaiF8iQ@mail.gmail.com/
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231112010609.848406-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Generalize is_branch_taken logic for SCALAR_VALUE register to handle
cases when both registers are not constants. Previously supported
<range> vs <scalar> cases are a natural subset of more generic <range>
vs <range> set of cases.
Generalized logic relies on straightforward segment intersection checks.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231112010609.848406-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Generalize bounds adjustment logic of reg_set_min_max() to handle not
just register vs constant case, but in general any register vs any
register cases. For most of the operations it's trivial extension based
on range vs range comparison logic, we just need to properly pick
min/max of a range to compare against min/max of the other range.
For BPF_JSET we keep the original capabilities, just make sure JSET is
integrated in the common framework. This is manifested in the
internal-only BPF_JSET + BPF_X "opcode" to allow for simpler and more
uniform rev_opcode() handling. See the code for details. This allows to
reuse the same code exactly both for TRUE and FALSE branches without
explicitly handling both conditions with custom code.
Note also that now we don't need a special handling of BPF_JEQ/BPF_JNE
case none of the registers are constants. This is now just a normal
generic case handled by reg_set_min_max().
To make tnum handling cleaner, tnum_with_subreg() helper is added, as
that's a common operator when dealing with 32-bit subregister bounds.
This keeps the overall logic much less noisy when it comes to tnums.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231112010609.848406-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Kirill Shutemov reported significant percpu memory consumption increase after
booting in 288-cpu VM ([1]) due to commit 41a5db8d81 ("bpf: Add support for
non-fix-size percpu mem allocation"). The percpu memory consumption is
increased from 111MB to 969MB. The number is from /proc/meminfo.
I tried to reproduce the issue with my local VM which at most supports upto
255 cpus. With 252 cpus, without the above commit, the percpu memory
consumption immediately after boot is 57MB while with the above commit the
percpu memory consumption is 231MB.
This is not good since so far percpu memory from bpf memory allocator is not
widely used yet. Let us change pre-allocation in init stage to on-demand
allocation when verifier detects there is a need of percpu memory for bpf
program. With this change, percpu memory consumption after boot can be reduced
signicantly.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231109154934.4saimljtqx625l3v@box.shutemov.name/
Fixes: 41a5db8d81 ("bpf: Add support for non-fix-size percpu mem allocation")
Reported-and-tested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231111013928.948838-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When BPF program is verified in privileged mode, BPF verifier allows
bounded loops. This means that from CFG point of view there are
definitely some back-edges. Original commit adjusted check_cfg() logic
to not detect back-edges in control flow graph if they are resulting
from conditional jumps, which the idea that subsequent full BPF
verification process will determine whether such loops are bounded or
not, and either accept or reject the BPF program. At least that's my
reading of the intent.
Unfortunately, the implementation of this idea doesn't work correctly in
all possible situations. Conditional jump might not result in immediate
back-edge, but just a few unconditional instructions later we can arrive
at back-edge. In such situations check_cfg() would reject BPF program
even in privileged mode, despite it might be bounded loop. Next patch
adds one simple program demonstrating such scenario.
To keep things simple, instead of trying to detect back edges in
privileged mode, just assume every back edge is valid and let subsequent
BPF verification prove or reject bounded loops.
Note a few test changes. For unknown reason, we have a few tests that
are specified to detect a back-edge in a privileged mode, but looking at
their code it seems like the right outcome is passing check_cfg() and
letting subsequent verification to make a decision about bounded or not
bounded looping.
Bounded recursion case is also interesting. The example should pass, as
recursion is limited to just a few levels and so we never reach maximum
number of nested frames and never exhaust maximum stack depth. But the
way that max stack depth logic works today it falsely detects this as
exceeding max nested frame count. This patch series doesn't attempt to
fix this orthogonal problem, so we just adjust expected verifier failure.
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Fixes: 2589726d12 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops")
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231110061412.2995786-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Fix an edge case in __mark_chain_precision() which prematurely stops
backtracking instructions in a state if it happens that state's first
and last instruction indexes are the same. This situations doesn't
necessarily mean that there were no instructions simulated in a state,
but rather that we starting from the instruction, jumped around a bit,
and then ended up at the same instruction before checkpointing or
marking precision.
To distinguish between these two possible situations, we need to consult
jump history. If it's empty or contain a single record "bridging" parent
state and first instruction of processed state, then we indeed
backtracked all instructions in this state. But if history is not empty,
we are definitely not done yet.
Move this logic inside get_prev_insn_idx() to contain it more nicely.
Use -ENOENT return code to denote "we are out of instructions"
situation.
This bug was exposed by verifier_loop1.c's bounded_recursion subtest, once
the next fix in this patch set is applied.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Fixes: b5dc0163d8 ("bpf: precise scalar_value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231110002638.4168352-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
ldimm64 instructions are 16-byte long, and so have to be handled
appropriately in check_cfg(), just like the rest of BPF verifier does.
This has implications in three places:
- when determining next instruction for non-jump instructions;
- when determining next instruction for callback address ldimm64
instructions (in visit_func_call_insn());
- when checking for unreachable instructions, where second half of
ldimm64 is expected to be unreachable;
We take this also as an opportunity to report jump into the middle of
ldimm64. And adjust few test_verifier tests accordingly.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Fixes: 475fb78fbf ("bpf: verifier (add branch/goto checks)")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231110002638.4168352-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch enables the following pattern:
/* mapval contains a __kptr pointing to refcounted local kptr */
mapval = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&map, &idx);
if (!mapval || !mapval->some_kptr) { /* omitted */ }
p = bpf_refcount_acquire(&mapval->some_kptr);
Currently this doesn't work because bpf_refcount_acquire expects an
owning or non-owning ref. The verifier defines non-owning ref as a type:
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF
while mapval->some_kptr is PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_UNTRUSTED. It's possible
to do the refcount_acquire by first bpf_kptr_xchg'ing mapval->some_kptr
into a temp kptr, refcount_acquiring that, and xchg'ing back into
mapval, but this is unwieldy and shouldn't be necessary.
This patch modifies btf_ld_kptr_type such that user-allocated types are
marked MEM_ALLOC and if those types have a bpf_{rb,list}_node they're
marked NON_OWN_REF as well. Additionally, due to changes to
bpf_obj_drop_impl earlier in this series, rcu_protected_object now
returns true for all user-allocated types, resulting in
mapval->some_kptr being marked MEM_RCU.
After this patch's changes, mapval->some_kptr is now:
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF | MEM_RCU
which results in it passing the non-owning ref test, and the motivating
example passing verification.
Future work will likely get rid of special non-owning ref lifetime logic
in the verifier, at which point we'll be able to delete the NON_OWN_REF
flag entirely.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231107085639.3016113-6-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The addition of is_reg_const() in commit 171de12646d2 ("bpf: generalize
is_branch_taken to handle all conditional jumps in one place") has made the
register_is_const() redundant. Give the former has more feature, plus the
fact the latter is only used in one place, replace register_is_const() with
is_reg_const(), and remove the definition of register_is_const.
This requires moving the definition of is_reg_const() further up. And since
the comment of reg_const_value() reference is_reg_const(), move it up as
well.
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108140043.12282-1-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Similar to ARG_PTR_TO_CONST_STR for BPF helpers, KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CONST_STR
specifies kfunc args that point to const strings. Annotation "__str" is
used to specify kfunc arg of type KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CONST_STR. Also, add
documentation for the "__str" annotation.
bpf_get_file_xattr() will be the first kfunc that uses this type.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231107045725.2278852-4-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
ARG_PTR_TO_CONST_STR is used to specify constant string args for BPF
helpers. The logic that verifies a reg is ARG_PTR_TO_CONST_STR is
implemented in check_func_arg().
As we introduce kfuncs with constant string args, it is necessary to
do the same check for kfuncs (in check_kfunc_args). Factor out the logic
for ARG_PTR_TO_CONST_STR to a new check_reg_const_str() so that it can be
reused.
check_func_arg() ensures check_reg_const_str() is only called with reg of
type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE. Add a redundent type check in check_reg_const_str()
to avoid misuse in the future. Other than this redundent check, there is
no change in behavior.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231107045725.2278852-3-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Change reg_set_min_max() to take FALSE/TRUE sets of two registers each,
instead of assuming that we are always comparing to a constant. For now
we still assume that right-hand side registers are constants (and make
sure that's the case by swapping src/dst regs, if necessary), but
subsequent patches will remove this limitation.
reg_set_min_max() is now called unconditionally for any register
comparison, so that might include pointer vs pointer. This makes it
consistent with is_branch_taken() generality. But we currently only
support adjustments based on SCALAR vs SCALAR comparisons, so
reg_set_min_max() has to guard itself againts pointers.
Taking two by two registers allows to further unify and simplify
check_cond_jmp_op() logic. We utilize fake register for BPF_K
conditional jump case, just like with is_branch_taken() part.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-18-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Similarly to is_branch_taken()-related refactorings, start preparing
reg_set_min_max() to handle more generic case of two non-const
registers. Start with renaming arguments to accommodate later addition
of second register as an input argument.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-17-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Combine 32-bit and 64-bit is_branch_taken logic for SCALAR_VALUE
registers. It makes it easier to see parallels between two domains
(32-bit and 64-bit), and makes subsequent refactoring more
straightforward.
No functional changes.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-16-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Make is_branch_taken() a single entry point for branch pruning decision
making, handling both pointer vs pointer, pointer vs scalar, and scalar
vs scalar cases in one place. This also nicely cleans up check_cond_jmp_op().
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-15-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Move is_branch_taken() slightly down. In subsequent patched we'll need
both flip_opcode() and is_pkt_ptr_branch_taken() for is_branch_taken(),
but instead of sprinkling forward declarations around, it makes more
sense to move is_branch_taken() lower below is_pkt_ptr_branch_taken(),
and also keep it closer to very tightly related reg_set_min_max(), as
they are two critical parts of the same SCALAR range tracking logic.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-14-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
While still assuming that second register is a constant, generalize
is_branch_taken-related code to accept two registers instead of register
plus explicit constant value. This also, as a side effect, allows to
simplify check_cond_jmp_op() by unifying BPF_K case with BPF_X case, for
which we use a fake register to represent BPF_K's imm constant as
a register.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-13-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Just taking mundane refactoring bits out into a separate patch. No
functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-12-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When performing 32-bit conditional operation operating on lower 32 bits
of a full 64-bit register, register full value isn't changed. We just
potentially gain new knowledge about that register's lower 32 bits.
Unfortunately, __reg_combine_{32,64}_into_{64,32} logic that
reg_set_min_max() performs as a last step, can lose information in some
cases due to __mark_reg64_unbounded() and __reg_assign_32_into_64().
That's bad and completely unnecessary. Especially __reg_assign_32_into_64()
looks completely out of place here, because we are not performing
zero-extending subregister assignment during conditional jump.
So this patch replaced __reg_combine_* with just a normal
reg_bounds_sync() which will do a proper job of deriving u64/s64 bounds
from u32/s32, and vice versa (among all other combinations).
__reg_combine_64_into_32() is also used in one more place,
coerce_reg_to_size(), while handling 1- and 2-byte register loads.
Looking into this, it seems like besides marking subregister as
unbounded before performing reg_bounds_sync(), we were also performing
deduction of smin32/smax32 and umin32/umax32 bounds from respective
smin/smax and umin/umax bounds. It's now redundant as reg_bounds_sync()
performs all the same logic more generically (e.g., without unnecessary
assumption that upper 32 bits of full register should be zero).
Long story short, we remove __reg_combine_64_into_32() completely, and
coerce_reg_to_size() now only does resetting subreg to unbounded and then
performing reg_bounds_sync() to recover as much information as possible
from 64-bit umin/umax and smin/smax bounds, set explicitly in
coerce_reg_to_size() earlier.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-10-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
There are cases (caught by subsequent reg_bounds tests in selftests/bpf)
where performing one round of __reg_deduce_bounds() doesn't propagate
all the information from, say, s32 to u32 bounds and than from newly
learned u32 bounds back to u64 and s64. So perform __reg_deduce_bounds()
twice to make sure such derivations are propagated fully after
reg_bounds_sync().
One such example is test `(s64)[0xffffffff00000001; 0] (u64)<
0xffffffff00000000` from selftest patch from this patch set. It demonstrates an
intricate dance of u64 -> s64 -> u64 -> u32 bounds adjustments, which requires
two rounds of __reg_deduce_bounds(). Here are corresponding refinement log from
selftest, showing evolution of knowledge.
REFINING (FALSE R1) (u64)SRC=[0xffffffff00000000; U64_MAX] (u64)DST_OLD=[0; U64_MAX] (u64)DST_NEW=[0xffffffff00000000; U64_MAX]
REFINING (FALSE R1) (u64)SRC=[0xffffffff00000000; U64_MAX] (s64)DST_OLD=[0xffffffff00000001; 0] (s64)DST_NEW=[0xffffffff00000001; -1]
REFINING (FALSE R1) (s64)SRC=[0xffffffff00000001; -1] (u64)DST_OLD=[0xffffffff00000000; U64_MAX] (u64)DST_NEW=[0xffffffff00000001; U64_MAX]
REFINING (FALSE R1) (u64)SRC=[0xffffffff00000001; U64_MAX] (u32)DST_OLD=[0; U32_MAX] (u32)DST_NEW=[1; U32_MAX]
R1 initially has smin/smax set to [0xffffffff00000001; -1], while umin/umax is
unknown. After (u64)< comparison, in FALSE branch we gain knowledge that
umin/umax is [0xffffffff00000000; U64_MAX]. That causes smin/smax to learn that
zero can't happen and upper bound is -1. Then smin/smax is adjusted from
umin/umax improving lower bound from 0xffffffff00000000 to 0xffffffff00000001.
And then eventually umin32/umax32 bounds are drived from umin/umax and become
[1; U32_MAX].
Selftest in the last patch is actually implementing a multi-round fixed-point
convergence logic, but so far all the tests are handled by two rounds of
reg_bounds_sync() on the verifier state, so we keep it simple for now.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-9-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a few interesting cases in which we can tighten 64-bit bounds based
on newly learnt information about 32-bit bounds. E.g., when full u64/s64
registers are used in BPF program, and then eventually compared as
u32/s32. The latter comparison doesn't change the value of full
register, but it does impose new restrictions on possible lower 32 bits
of such full registers. And we can use that to derive additional full
register bounds information.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-8-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a special case where we can derive valid s32 bounds from umin/umax
or smin/smax by stitching together negative s32 subrange and
non-negative s32 subrange. That requires upper 32 bits to form a [N, N+1]
range in u32 domain (taking into account wrap around, so 0xffffffff
to 0x00000000 is a valid [N, N+1] range in this sense). See code comment
for concrete examples.
Eduard Zingerman also provided an alternative explanation ([0]) for more
mathematically inclined readers:
Suppose:
. there are numbers a, b, c
. 2**31 <= b < 2**32
. 0 <= c < 2**31
. umin = 2**32 * a + b
. umax = 2**32 * (a + 1) + c
The number of values in the range represented by [umin; umax] is:
. N = umax - umin + 1 = 2**32 + c - b + 1
. min(N) = 2**32 + 0 - (2**32-1) + 1 = 2, with b = 2**32-1, c = 0
. max(N) = 2**32 + (2**31 - 1) - 2**31 + 1 = 2**32, with b = 2**31, c = 2**31-1
Hence [(s32)b; (s32)c] forms a valid range.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/d7af631802f0cfae20df77fe70068702d24bbd31.camel@gmail.com/
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-7-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Comments in code try to explain the idea behind why this is correct.
Please check the code and comments.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
All the logic that applies to u64 vs s64, equally applies for u32 vs s32
relationships (just taken in a smaller 32-bit numeric space). So do the
same deduction of smin32/smax32 from umin32/umax32, if we can.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add smin/smax derivation from appropriate umin/umax values. Previously the
logic was surprisingly asymmetric, trying to derive umin/umax from smin/smax
(if possible), but not trying to do the same in the other direction. A simple
addition to __reg64_deduce_bounds() fixes this.
Added also generic comment about u64/s64 ranges and their relationship.
Hopefully that helps readers to understand all the bounds deductions
a bit better.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
BPF_END and BPF_NEG has a different specification for the source bit in
the opcode compared to other ALU/ALU64 instructions, and is either
reserved or use to specify the byte swap endianness. In both cases the
source bit does not encode source operand location, and src_reg is a
reserved field.
backtrack_insn() currently does not differentiate BPF_END and BPF_NEG
from other ALU/ALU64 instructions, which leads to r0 being incorrectly
marked as precise when processing BPF_ALU | BPF_TO_BE | BPF_END
instructions. This commit teaches backtrack_insn() to correctly mark
precision for such case.
While precise tracking of BPF_NEG and other BPF_END instructions are
correct and does not need fixing, this commit opt to process all BPF_NEG
and BPF_END instructions within the same if-clause to better align with
current convention used in the verifier (e.g. check_alu_op).
Fixes: b5dc0163d8 ("bpf: precise scalar_value tracking")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Mohamed Mahmoud <mmahmoud@redhat.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87jzrrwptf.fsf@toke.dk
Tested-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Tao Lyu <tao.lyu@epfl.ch>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102053913.12004-2-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The newly added open-coded css_task iter would try to hold the global
css_set_lock in bpf_iter_css_task_new, so the bpf side has to be careful in
where it allows to use this iter. The mainly concern is dead locking on
css_set_lock. check_css_task_iter_allowlist() in verifier enforced css_task
can only be used in bpf_lsm hooks and sleepable bpf_iter.
This patch relax the allowlist for css_task iter. Any lsm and any iter
(even non-sleepable) and any sleepable are safe since they would not hold
the css_set_lock before entering BPF progs context.
This patch also fixes the misused BPF_TRACE_ITER in
check_css_task_iter_allowlist which compared bpf_prog_type with
bpf_attach_type.
Fixes: 9c66dc94b6 ("bpf: Introduce css_task open-coded iterator kfuncs")
Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231031050438.93297-2-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Our MPTCP CI complained [1] -- and KBuild too -- that it was no longer
possible to build the kernel without CONFIG_CGROUPS:
kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_new':
kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:14: error: 'CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS' undeclared (first use in this function)
919 | case CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS | CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED:
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:36: error: 'CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED' undeclared (first use in this function)
919 | case CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS | CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED:
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:927:60: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct css_task_iter'
927 | kit->css_it = bpf_mem_alloc(&bpf_global_ma, sizeof(struct css_task_iter));
| ^~~~~~
kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:930:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_start'; did you mean 'task_seq_start'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
930 | css_task_iter_start(css, flags, kit->css_it);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| task_seq_start
kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_next':
kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:940:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_next'; did you mean 'class_dev_iter_next'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
940 | return css_task_iter_next(kit->css_it);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| class_dev_iter_next
kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:940:16: error: returning 'int' from a function with return type 'struct task_struct *' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
940 | return css_task_iter_next(kit->css_it);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_destroy':
kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:949:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_end' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
949 | css_task_iter_end(kit->css_it);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This patch simply surrounds with a #ifdef the new code requiring CGroups
support. It seems enough for the compiler and this is similar to
bpf_iter_css_{new,next,destroy}() functions where no other #ifdef have
been added in kernel/bpf/helpers.c and in the selftests.
Fixes: 9c66dc94b6 ("bpf: Introduce css_task open-coded iterator kfuncs")
Link: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/6665206927
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310260528.aHWgVFqq-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
[ added missing ifdefs for BTF_ID cgroup definitions ]
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231101181601.1493271-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When determining if an if/else branch will always or never be taken, use
signed range knowledge in addition to currently used unsigned range knowledge.
If either signed or unsigned range suggests that condition is always/never
taken, return corresponding branch_taken verdict.
Current use of unsigned range for this seems arbitrary and unnecessarily
incomplete. It is possible for *signed* operations to be performed on
register, which could "invalidate" unsigned range for that register. In such
case branch_taken will be artificially useless, even if we can still tell
that some constant is outside of register value range based on its signed
bounds.
veristat-based validation shows zero differences across selftests, Cilium,
and Meta-internal BPF object files.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231022205743.72352-2-andrii@kernel.org
Additional logging in is_state_visited(): if infinite loop is detected
print full verifier state for both current and equivalent states.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024000917.12153-8-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
It turns out that .branches > 0 in is_state_visited() is not a
sufficient condition to identify if two verifier states form a loop
when iterators convergence is computed. This commit adds logic to
distinguish situations like below:
(I) initial (II) initial
| |
V V
.---------> hdr ..
| | |
| V V
| .------... .------..
| | | | |
| V V V V
| ... ... .-> hdr ..
| | | | | |
| V V | V V
| succ <- cur | succ <- cur
| | | |
| V | V
| ... | ...
| | | |
'----' '----'
For both (I) and (II) successor 'succ' of the current state 'cur' was
previously explored and has branches count at 0. However, loop entry
'hdr' corresponding to 'succ' might be a part of current DFS path.
If that is the case 'succ' and 'cur' are members of the same loop
and have to be compared exactly.
Co-developed-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024000917.12153-6-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Convergence for open coded iterators is computed in is_state_visited()
by examining states with branches count > 1 and using states_equal().
states_equal() computes sub-state relation using read and precision marks.
Read and precision marks are propagated from children states,
thus are not guaranteed to be complete inside a loop when branches
count > 1. This could be demonstrated using the following unsafe program:
1. r7 = -16
2. r6 = bpf_get_prandom_u32()
3. while (bpf_iter_num_next(&fp[-8])) {
4. if (r6 != 42) {
5. r7 = -32
6. r6 = bpf_get_prandom_u32()
7. continue
8. }
9. r0 = r10
10. r0 += r7
11. r8 = *(u64 *)(r0 + 0)
12. r6 = bpf_get_prandom_u32()
13. }
Here verifier would first visit path 1-3, create a checkpoint at 3
with r7=-16, continue to 4-7,3 with r7=-32.
Because instructions at 9-12 had not been visitied yet existing
checkpoint at 3 does not have read or precision mark for r7.
Thus states_equal() would return true and verifier would discard
current state, thus unsafe memory access at 11 would not be caught.
This commit fixes this loophole by introducing exact state comparisons
for iterator convergence logic:
- registers are compared using regs_exact() regardless of read or
precision marks;
- stack slots have to have identical type.
Unfortunately, this is too strict even for simple programs like below:
i = 0;
while(iter_next(&it))
i++;
At each iteration step i++ would produce a new distinct state and
eventually instruction processing limit would be reached.
To avoid such behavior speculatively forget (widen) range for
imprecise scalar registers, if those registers were not precise at the
end of the previous iteration and do not match exactly.
This a conservative heuristic that allows to verify wide range of
programs, however it precludes verification of programs that conjure
an imprecise value on the first loop iteration and use it as precise
on the second.
Test case iter_task_vma_for_each() presents one of such cases:
unsigned int seen = 0;
...
bpf_for_each(task_vma, vma, task, 0) {
if (seen >= 1000)
break;
...
seen++;
}
Here clang generates the following code:
<LBB0_4>:
24: r8 = r6 ; stash current value of
... body ... 'seen'
29: r1 = r10
30: r1 += -0x8
31: call bpf_iter_task_vma_next
32: r6 += 0x1 ; seen++;
33: if r0 == 0x0 goto +0x2 <LBB0_6> ; exit on next() == NULL
34: r7 += 0x10
35: if r8 < 0x3e7 goto -0xc <LBB0_4> ; loop on seen < 1000
<LBB0_6>:
... exit ...
Note that counter in r6 is copied to r8 and then incremented,
conditional jump is done using r8. Because of this precision mark for
r6 lags one state behind of precision mark on r8 and widening logic
kicks in.
Adding barrier_var(seen) after conditional is sufficient to force
clang use the same register for both counting and conditional jump.
This issue was discussed in the thread [1] which was started by
Andrew Werner <awerner32@gmail.com> demonstrating a similar bug
in callback functions handling. The callbacks would be addressed
in a followup patch.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/97a90da09404c65c8e810cf83c94ac703705dc0e.camel@gmail.com/
Co-developed-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024000917.12153-4-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Extract same_callsites() from clean_live_states() as a utility function.
This function would be used by the next patch in the set.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024000917.12153-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subsequent patches would make use of explored_state() function.
Move it up to avoid adding unnecessary prototype.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024000917.12153-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When using task_iter to iterate all threads of a specific task, we enforce
that the user must pass a valid task pointer to ensure safety. However,
when iterating all threads/process in the system, BPF verifier still
require a valid ptr instead of "nullable" pointer, even though it's
pointless, which is a kind of surprising from usability standpoint. It
would be nice if we could let that kfunc accept a explicit null pointer
when we are using BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_{PROCS, THREADS} and a valid pointer
when using BPF_TASK_ITER_THREAD.
Given a trival kfunc:
__bpf_kfunc void FN(struct TYPE_A *obj);
BPF Prog would reject a nullptr for obj. The error info is:
"arg#x pointer type xx xx must point to scalar, or struct with scalar"
reported by get_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(). The reg->type is SCALAR_VALUE and
the btf type of ref_t is not scalar or scalar_struct which leads to the
rejection of get_kfunc_ptr_arg_type.
This patch add "__nullable" annotation:
__bpf_kfunc void FN(struct TYPE_A *obj__nullable);
Here __nullable indicates obj can be optional, user can pass a explicit
nullptr or a normal TYPE_A pointer. In get_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(), we will
detect whether the current arg is optional and register is null, If so,
return a new kfunc_ptr_arg_type KF_ARG_PTR_TO_NULL and skip to the next
arg in check_kfunc_args().
Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231018061746.111364-7-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
css_iter and task_iter should be used in rcu section. Specifically, in
sleepable progs explicit bpf_rcu_read_lock() is needed before use these
iters. In normal bpf progs that have implicit rcu_read_lock(), it's OK to
use them directly.
This patch adds a new a KF flag KF_RCU_PROTECTED for bpf_iter_task_new and
bpf_iter_css_new. It means the kfunc should be used in RCU CS. We check
whether we are in rcu cs before we want to invoke this kfunc. If the rcu
protection is guaranteed, we would let st->type = PTR_TO_STACK | MEM_RCU.
Once user do rcu_unlock during the iteration, state MEM_RCU of regs would
be cleared. is_iter_reg_valid_init() will reject if reg->type is UNTRUSTED.
It is worth noting that currently, bpf_rcu_read_unlock does not
clear the state of the STACK_ITER reg, since bpf_for_each_spilled_reg
only considers STACK_SPILL. This patch also let bpf_for_each_spilled_reg
search STACK_ITER.
Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231018061746.111364-6-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch adds kfuncs bpf_iter_css_task_{new,next,destroy} which allow
creation and manipulation of struct bpf_iter_css_task in open-coded
iterator style. These kfuncs actually wrapps css_task_iter_{start,next,
end}. BPF programs can use these kfuncs through bpf_for_each macro for
iteration of all tasks under a css.
css_task_iter_*() would try to get the global spin-lock *css_set_lock*, so
the bpf side has to be careful in where it allows to use this iter.
Currently we only allow it in bpf_lsm and bpf iter-s.
Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231018061746.111364-3-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEABYIAB0WIQTFp0I1jqZrAX+hPRXbK58LschIgwUCZS1d4wAKCRDbK58LschI
g4DSAP441CdKh8fd+wNKUSKHFbpCQ6EvocR6Nf+Sj2DFUx/w/QEA7mfju7Abqjc3
xwDEx0BuhrjMrjV5MmEpxc7lYl9XcQU=
=vuWk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2023-10-16
We've added 90 non-merge commits during the last 25 day(s) which contain
a total of 120 files changed, 3519 insertions(+), 895 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Add missed stats for kprobes to retrieve the number of missed kprobe
executions and subsequent executions of BPF programs, from Jiri Olsa.
2) Add cgroup BPF sockaddr hooks for unix sockets. The use case is
for systemd to reimplement the LogNamespace feature which allows
running multiple instances of systemd-journald to process the logs
of different services, from Daan De Meyer.
3) Implement BPF CPUv4 support for s390x BPF JIT, from Ilya Leoshkevich.
4) Improve BPF verifier log output for scalar registers to better
disambiguate their internal state wrt defaults vs min/max values
matching, from Andrii Nakryiko.
5) Extend the BPF fib lookup helpers for IPv4/IPv6 to support retrieving
the source IP address with a new BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_SRC flag,
from Martynas Pumputis.
6) Add support for open-coded task_vma iterator to help with symbolization
for BPF-collected user stacks, from Dave Marchevsky.
7) Add libbpf getters for accessing individual BPF ring buffers which
is useful for polling them individually, for example, from Martin Kelly.
8) Extend AF_XDP selftests to validate the SHARED_UMEM feature,
from Tushar Vyavahare.
9) Improve BPF selftests cross-building support for riscv arch,
from Björn Töpel.
10) Add the ability to pin a BPF timer to the same calling CPU,
from David Vernet.
11) Fix libbpf's bpf_tracing.h macros for riscv to use the generic
implementation of PT_REGS_SYSCALL_REGS() to access syscall arguments,
from Alexandre Ghiti.
12) Extend libbpf to support symbol versioning for uprobes, from Hengqi Chen.
13) Fix bpftool's skeleton code generation to guarantee that ELF data
is 8 byte aligned, from Ian Rogers.
14) Inherit system-wide cpu_mitigations_off() setting for Spectre v1/v4
security mitigations in BPF verifier, from Yafang Shao.
15) Annotate struct bpf_stack_map with __counted_by attribute to prepare
BPF side for upcoming __counted_by compiler support, from Kees Cook.
* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (90 commits)
bpf: Ensure proper register state printing for cond jumps
bpf: Disambiguate SCALAR register state output in verifier logs
selftests/bpf: Make align selftests more robust
selftests/bpf: Improve missed_kprobe_recursion test robustness
selftests/bpf: Improve percpu_alloc test robustness
selftests/bpf: Add tests for open-coded task_vma iter
bpf: Introduce task_vma open-coded iterator kfuncs
selftests/bpf: Rename bpf_iter_task_vma.c to bpf_iter_task_vmas.c
bpf: Don't explicitly emit BTF for struct btf_iter_num
bpf: Change syscall_nr type to int in struct syscall_tp_t
net/bpf: Avoid unused "sin_addr_len" warning when CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF is not set
bpf: Avoid unnecessary audit log for CPU security mitigations
selftests/bpf: Add tests for cgroup unix socket address hooks
selftests/bpf: Make sure mount directory exists
documentation/bpf: Document cgroup unix socket address hooks
bpftool: Add support for cgroup unix socket address hooks
libbpf: Add support for cgroup unix socket address hooks
bpf: Implement cgroup sockaddr hooks for unix sockets
bpf: Add bpf_sock_addr_set_sun_path() to allow writing unix sockaddr from bpf
bpf: Propagate modified uaddrlen from cgroup sockaddr programs
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231016204803.30153-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Verifier emits relevant register state involved in any given instruction
next to it after `;` to the right, if possible. Or, worst case, on the
separate line repeating instruction index.
E.g., a nice and simple case would be:
2: (d5) if r0 s<= 0x0 goto pc+1 ; R0_w=0
But if there is some intervening extra output (e.g., precision
backtracking log) involved, we are supposed to see the state after the
precision backtrack log:
4: (75) if r0 s>= 0x0 goto pc+1
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 4 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 2: (d5) if r0 s<= 0x0 goto pc+1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r0 stack= before 1: (b7) r0 = 0
6: R0_w=0
First off, note that in `6: R0_w=0` instruction index corresponds to the
next instruction, not to the conditional jump instruction itself, which
is wrong and we'll get to that.
But besides that, the above is a happy case that does work today. Yet,
if it so happens that precision backtracking had to traverse some of the
parent states, this `6: R0_w=0` state output would be missing.
This is due to a quirk of print_verifier_state() routine, which performs
mark_verifier_state_clean(env) at the end. This marks all registers as
"non-scratched", which means that subsequent logic to print *relevant*
registers (that is, "scratched ones") fails and doesn't see anything
relevant to print and skips the output altogether.
print_verifier_state() is used both to print instruction context, but
also to print an **entire** verifier state indiscriminately, e.g.,
during precision backtracking (and in a few other situations, like
during entering or exiting subprogram). Which means if we have to print
entire parent state before getting to printing instruction context
state, instruction context is marked as clean and is omitted.
Long story short, this is definitely not intentional. So we fix this
behavior in this patch by teaching print_verifier_state() to clear
scratch state only if it was used to print instruction state, not the
parent/callback state. This is determined by print_all option, so if
it's not set, we don't clear scratch state. This fixes missing
instruction state for these cases.
As for the mismatched instruction index, we fix that by making sure we
call print_insn_state() early inside check_cond_jmp_op() before we
adjusted insn_idx based on jump branch taken logic. And with that we get
desired correct information:
9: (16) if w4 == 0x1 goto pc+9
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 9 first_idx 9 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: parent state regs=r4 stack=: R2_w=1944 R4_rw=P1 R10=fp0
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 8 first_idx 0 subseq_idx 9
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r4 stack= before 8: (66) if w4 s> 0x3 goto pc+5
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r4 stack= before 7: (b7) r4 = 1
9: R4=1
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231011223728.3188086-6-andrii@kernel.org
Currently the way that verifier prints SCALAR_VALUE register state (and
PTR_TO_PACKET, which can have var_off and ranges info as well) is very
ambiguous.
In the name of brevity we are trying to eliminate "unnecessary" output
of umin/umax, smin/smax, u32_min/u32_max, and s32_min/s32_max values, if
possible. Current rules are that if any of those have their default
value (which for mins is the minimal value of its respective types: 0,
S32_MIN, or S64_MIN, while for maxs it's U32_MAX, S32_MAX, S64_MAX, or
U64_MAX) *OR* if there is another min/max value that as matching value.
E.g., if smin=100 and umin=100, we'll emit only umin=10, omitting smin
altogether. This approach has a few problems, being both ambiguous and
sort-of incorrect in some cases.
Ambiguity is due to missing value could be either default value or value
of umin/umax or smin/smax. This is especially confusing when we mix
signed and unsigned ranges. Quite often, umin=0 and smin=0, and so we'll
have only `umin=0` leaving anyone reading verifier log to guess whether
smin is actually 0 or it's actually -9223372036854775808 (S64_MIN). And
often times it's important to know, especially when debugging tricky
issues.
"Sort-of incorrectness" comes from mixing negative and positive values.
E.g., if umin is some large positive number, it can be equal to smin
which is, interpreted as signed value, is actually some negative value.
Currently, that smin will be omitted and only umin will be emitted with
a large positive value, giving an impression that smin is also positive.
Anyway, ambiguity is the biggest issue making it impossible to have an
exact understanding of register state, preventing any sort of automated
testing of verifier state based on verifier log. This patch is
attempting to rectify the situation by removing ambiguity, while
minimizing the verboseness of register state output.
The rules are straightforward:
- if some of the values are missing, then it definitely has a default
value. I.e., `umin=0` means that umin is zero, but smin is actually
S64_MIN;
- all the various boundaries that happen to have the same value are
emitted in one equality separated sequence. E.g., if umin and smin are
both 100, we'll emit `smin=umin=100`, making this explicit;
- we do not mix negative and positive values together, and even if
they happen to have the same bit-level value, they will be emitted
separately with proper sign. I.e., if both umax and smax happen to be
0xffffffffffffffff, we'll emit them both separately as
`smax=-1,umax=18446744073709551615`;
- in the name of a bit more uniformity and consistency,
{u32,s32}_{min,max} are renamed to {s,u}{min,max}32, which seems to
improve readability.
The above means that in case of all 4 ranges being, say, [50, 100] range,
we'd previously see hugely ambiguous:
R1=scalar(umin=50,umax=100)
Now, we'll be more explicit:
R1=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=50,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=100)
This is slightly more verbose, but distinct from the case when we don't
know anything about signed boundaries and 32-bit boundaries, which under
new rules will match the old case:
R1=scalar(umin=50,umax=100)
Also, in the name of simplicity of implementation and consistency, order
for {s,u}32_{min,max} are emitted *before* var_off. Previously they were
emitted afterwards, for unclear reasons.
This patch also includes a few fixes to selftests that expect exact
register state to accommodate slight changes to verifier format. You can
see that the changes are pretty minimal in common cases.
Note, the special case when SCALAR_VALUE register is a known constant
isn't changed, we'll emit constant value once, interpreted as signed
value.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231011223728.3188086-5-andrii@kernel.org
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR.
No conflicts.
Adjacent changes:
kernel/bpf/verifier.c
829955981c ("bpf: Fix verifier log for async callback return values")
a923819fb2 ("bpf: Treat first argument as return value for bpf_throw")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
These hooks allows intercepting connect(), getsockname(),
getpeername(), sendmsg() and recvmsg() for unix sockets. The unix
socket hooks get write access to the address length because the
address length is not fixed when dealing with unix sockets and
needs to be modified when a unix socket address is modified by
the hook. Because abstract socket unix addresses start with a
NUL byte, we cannot recalculate the socket address in kernelspace
after running the hook by calculating the length of the unix socket
path using strlen().
These hooks can be used when users want to multiplex syscall to a
single unix socket to multiple different processes behind the scenes
by redirecting the connect() and other syscalls to process specific
sockets.
We do not implement support for intercepting bind() because when
using bind() with unix sockets with a pathname address, this creates
an inode in the filesystem which must be cleaned up. If we rewrite
the address, the user might try to clean up the wrong file, leaking
the socket in the filesystem where it is never cleaned up. Until we
figure out a solution for this (and a use case for intercepting bind()),
we opt to not allow rewriting the sockaddr in bind() calls.
We also implement recvmsg() support for connected streams so that
after a connect() that is modified by a sockaddr hook, any corresponding
recmvsg() on the connected socket can also be modified to make the
connected program think it is connected to the "intended" remote.
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231011185113.140426-5-daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
The verifier, as part of check_return_code(), verifies that async
callbacks such as from e.g. timers, will return 0. It does this by
correctly checking that R0->var_off is in tnum_const(0), which
effectively checks that it's in a range of 0. If this condition fails,
however, it prints an error message which says that the value should
have been in (0x0; 0x1). This results in possibly confusing output such
as the following in which an async callback returns 1:
At async callback the register R0 has value (0x1; 0x0) should have been in (0x0; 0x1)
The fix is easy -- we should just pass the tnum_const(0) as the correct
range to verbose_invalid_scalar(), which will then print the following:
At async callback the register R0 has value (0x1; 0x0) should have been in (0x0; 0x0)
Fixes: bfc6bb74e4 ("bpf: Implement verifier support for validation of async callbacks.")
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231009161414.235829-1-void@manifault.com
On the architectures that use bpf_jit_needs_zext(), e.g., s390x, the
verifier incorrectly inserts a zero-extension after BPF_MEMSX, leading
to miscompilations like the one below:
24: 89 1a ff fe 00 00 00 00 "r1 = *(s16 *)(r10 - 2);" # zext_dst set
0x3ff7fdb910e: lgh %r2,-2(%r13,%r0) # load halfword
0x3ff7fdb9114: llgfr %r2,%r2 # wrong!
25: 65 10 00 03 00 00 7f ff if r1 s> 32767 goto +3 <l0_1> # check_cond_jmp_op()
Disable such zero-extensions. The JITs need to insert sign-extension
themselves, if necessary.
Suggested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919101336.2223655-2-iii@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In mark_chain_precision() logic, when we reach the entry to a global
func, it is expected that R1-R5 might be still requested to be marked
precise. This would correspond to some integer input arguments being
tracked as precise. This is all expected and handled as a special case.
What's not expected is that we'll leave backtrack_state structure with
some register bits set. This is because for subsequent precision
propagations backtrack_state is reused without clearing masks, as all
code paths are carefully written in a way to leave empty backtrack_state
with zeroed out masks, for speed.
The fix is trivial, we always clear register bit in the register mask, and
then, optionally, set reg->precise if register is SCALAR_VALUE type.
Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>
Fixes: be2ef81615 ("bpf: allow precision tracking for programs with subprogs")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918210110.2241458-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The kfunc code to handle KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CALLBACK does not check the reg
type before using reg->subprogno. This can accidently permit invalid
pointers from being passed into callback helpers (e.g. silently from
different paths). Likewise, reg->subprogno from the per-register type
union may not be meaningful either. We need to reject any other type
except PTR_TO_FUNC.
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Fixes: 5d92ddc3de ("bpf: Add callback validation to kfunc verifier logic")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-14-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
During testing, it was discovered that extensions to exception callbacks
had no checks, upon running a testcase, the kernel ended up running off
the end of a program having final call as bpf_throw, and hitting int3
instructions.
The reason is that while the default exception callback would have reset
the stack frame to return back to the main program's caller, the
replacing extension program will simply return back to bpf_throw, which
will instead return back to the program and the program will continue
execution, now in an undefined state where anything could happen.
The way to support extensions to an exception callback would be to mark
the BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT main subprog as an exception_cb, and prevent it
from calling bpf_throw. This would make the JIT produce a prologue that
restores saved registers and reset the stack frame. But let's not do
that until there is a concrete use case for this, and simply disallow
this for now.
Similar issues will exist for fentry and fexit cases, where trampoline
saves data on the stack when invoking exception callback, which however
will then end up resetting the stack frame, and on return, the fexit
program will never will invoked as the return address points to the main
program's caller in the kernel. Instead of additional complexity and
back and forth between the two stacks to enable such a use case, simply
forbid it.
One key point here to note is that currently X86_TAIL_CALL_OFFSET didn't
require any modifications, even though we emit instructions before the
corresponding endbr64 instruction. This is because we ensure that a main
subprog never serves as an exception callback, and therefore the
exception callback (which will be a global subprog) can never serve as
the tail call target, eliminating any discrepancies. However, once we
support a BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT to also act as an exception callback, it
will end up requiring change to the tail call offset to account for the
extra instructions. For simplicitly, tail calls could be disabled for
such targets.
Noting the above, it appears better to wait for a concrete use case
before choosing to permit extension programs to replace exception
callbacks.
As a precaution, we disable fentry and fexit for exception callbacks as
well.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-13-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In case of the default exception callback, change the behavior of
bpf_throw, where the passed cookie value is no longer ignored, but
is instead the return value of the default exception callback. As
such, we need to place restrictions on the value being passed into
bpf_throw in such a case, only allowing those permitted by the
check_return_code function.
Thus, bpf_throw can now control the return value of the program from
each call site without having the user install a custom exception
callback just to override the return value when an exception is thrown.
We also modify the hidden subprog instructions to now move BPF_REG_1 to
BPF_REG_0, so as to set the return value before exit in the default
callback.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-9-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Since exception callbacks are not referenced using bpf_pseudo_func and
bpf_pseudo_call instructions, check_cfg traversal will never explore
instructions of the exception callback. Even after adding the subprog,
the program will then fail with a 'unreachable insn' error.
We thus need to begin walking from the start of the exception callback
again in check_cfg after a complete CFG traversal finishes, so as to
explore the CFG rooted at the exception callback.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-8-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
By default, the subprog generated by the verifier to handle a thrown
exception hardcodes a return value of 0. To allow user-defined logic
and modification of the return value when an exception is thrown,
introduce the 'exception_callback:' declaration tag, which marks a
callback as the default exception handler for the program.
The format of the declaration tag is 'exception_callback:<value>', where
<value> is the name of the exception callback. Each main program can be
tagged using this BTF declaratiion tag to associate it with an exception
callback. In case the tag is absent, the default callback is used.
As such, the exception callback cannot be modified at runtime, only set
during verification.
Allowing modification of the callback for the current program execution
at runtime leads to issues when the programs begin to nest, as any
per-CPU state maintaing this information will have to be saved and
restored. We don't want it to stay in bpf_prog_aux as this takes a
global effect for all programs. An alternative solution is spilling
the callback pointer at a known location on the program stack on entry,
and then passing this location to bpf_throw as a parameter.
However, since exceptions are geared more towards a use case where they
are ideally never invoked, optimizing for this use case and adding to
the complexity has diminishing returns.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-7-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch splits the check_btf_info's check_btf_func check into two
separate phases. The first phase sets up the BTF and prepares
func_info, but does not perform any validation of required invariants
for subprogs just yet. This is left to the second phase, which happens
where check_btf_info executes currently, and performs the line_info and
CO-RE relocation.
The reason to perform this split is to obtain the userspace supplied
func_info information before we perform the add_subprog call, where we
would now require finding and adding subprogs that may not have a
bpf_pseudo_call or bpf_pseudo_func instruction in the program.
We require this as we want to enable userspace to supply exception
callbacks that can override the default hidden subprogram generated by
the verifier (which performs a hardcoded action). In such a case, the
exception callback may never be referenced in an instruction, but will
still be suitably annotated (by way of BTF declaration tags). For
finding this exception callback, we would require the program's BTF
information, and the supplied func_info information which maps BTF type
IDs to subprograms.
Since the exception callback won't actually be referenced through
instructions, later checks in check_cfg and do_check_subprogs will not
verify the subprog. This means that add_subprog needs to add them in the
add_subprog_and_kfunc phase before we move forward, which is why the BTF
and func_info are required at that point.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-6-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch implements BPF exceptions, and introduces a bpf_throw kfunc
to allow programs to throw exceptions during their execution at runtime.
A bpf_throw invocation is treated as an immediate termination of the
program, returning back to its caller within the kernel, unwinding all
stack frames.
This allows the program to simplify its implementation, by testing for
runtime conditions which the verifier has no visibility into, and assert
that they are true. In case they are not, the program can simply throw
an exception from the other branch.
BPF exceptions are explicitly *NOT* an unlikely slowpath error handling
primitive, and this objective has guided design choices of the
implementation of the them within the kernel (with the bulk of the cost
for unwinding the stack offloaded to the bpf_throw kfunc).
The implementation of this mechanism requires use of add_hidden_subprog
mechanism introduced in the previous patch, which generates a couple of
instructions to move R1 to R0 and exit. The JIT then rewrites the
prologue of this subprog to take the stack pointer and frame pointer as
inputs and reset the stack frame, popping all callee-saved registers
saved by the main subprog. The bpf_throw function then walks the stack
at runtime, and invokes this exception subprog with the stack and frame
pointers as parameters.
Reviewers must take note that currently the main program is made to save
all callee-saved registers on x86_64 during entry into the program. This
is because we must do an equivalent of a lightweight context switch when
unwinding the stack, therefore we need the callee-saved registers of the
caller of the BPF program to be able to return with a sane state.
Note that we have to additionally handle r12, even though it is not used
by the program, because when throwing the exception the program makes an
entry into the kernel which could clobber r12 after saving it on the
stack. To be able to preserve the value we received on program entry, we
push r12 and restore it from the generated subprogram when unwinding the
stack.
For now, bpf_throw invocation fails when lingering resources or locks
exist in that path of the program. In a future followup, bpf_throw will
be extended to perform frame-by-frame unwinding to release lingering
resources for each stack frame, removing this limitation.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912233214.1518551-5-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
