As talked about in commit d2aacaf073 ("drm/panel: Check for already
prepared/enabled in drm_panel"), we want to remove needless code from
panel drivers that was storing and double-checking the
prepared/enabled state. Even if someone was relying on the
double-check before, that double-check is now in the core and not
needed in individual drivers.
This pile of panel drivers appears to be simple to handle. Based on
code inspection they seemed to be using the prepared/enabled state
simply for double-checking that nothing else in the kernel called them
inconsistently. Now that the core drm_panel is doing the double
checking (and warning) it should be very clear that these devices
don't need their own double-check.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230804140605.RFC.1.Ia54954fd2f7645c1b86597494902973f57feeb71@changeid
All implementations return 0 and the return value of mipi_dsi_drv_remove()
is ignored anyhow.
So change the prototype of the remove function to return no value. This
way driver authors are not tempted to assume that passing an error to
the upper layer is a good idea. All drivers are adapted accordingly.
There is no intended change of behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220708094922.1408248-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Many DSI panel drivers fail to clean up their panel references on
mipi_dsi_attach() failure, so we're leaving a dangling drm_panel
reference to freed memory. Clean that up on failure.
Noticed by inspection, after seeing similar problems on other drivers.
Therefore, I'm not marking Fixes/stable.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210923173336.3.If9e74fa9b1d6eaa9e0e5b95b2b957b992740251c@changeid
The function "int drm_panel_add(struct drm_panel *panel)"
always returns 0, this return value is meaningless.
Also, there is no need to check return value which calls
"drm_panel_add and", error branch code will never run.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200801120216.8488-1-bernard@vivo.com
