If SSL is enabled, utils will include function `do_sha1_hash()` to
generate a sha1 encrypted buffer. Last function argument of
`EVP_DigestFinal_ex()` requires a `unsigned int` but the current
parameter is an `integer` type.
See error:
utils.c:350:38: error: passing 'int *' to parameter of type 'unsigned int *' converts between pointers to integer types with different sign
[-Werror,-Wpointer-sign]
EVP_DigestFinal_ex(mdctx, md_value, md_len);
^~~~~~
/usr/include/openssl/evp.h:549:49: note: passing argument to parameter 's' here
unsigned int *s);
Signed-off-by: Julio Faracco <jcfaracco@gmail.com>
Most kernels don't have this functionality yet, and so the warning is
printed a lot. Our people are scared of warnings, so let's make it INFO
instead in this case.
Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>
``/proc`` might be mounted with ``hidepid=2``.
This makes ``/proc/1/…`` appear absent for non-root users.
When using the templates or the nvidia hook as a non-root user
(e.g., when creating unprivileged containers) the error
"/proc/1/uid_map: No such file or directory" is printed.
Since the script works correctly despite the error, this error
message might be confusing for users.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Pirl <git@lukas-pirl.de>
Makes it easier to implement syscalls which need to write to
a buffer passed by user space as a pointer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Suggested usage:
return error_log_errno(err, "Failed: %s", "some error");
It sets errno to the value of err, then calls SYSERROR with the format and remaining args.
It always returns -1.
Suggested-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Parrott <thomas.parrott@canonical.com>
. Use sizeof() instead of hardcoded values
. snprintf(..., size, ""...) is in error if the return code is >= size (not sufficient to set only ">")
Signed-off-by: Rachid Koucha <rachid.koucha@gmail.com>
On the one hand this should close the race between the
process exiting until the proxy reads the request.
On the other hand it'll help the proxy quickly access info
from /proc (such as ./cwd, ./ns/mnt, ...)
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
We only read the message without the cookie. For now assert
that the sender also didn't try to send more by letting
`recvmsg()` return the original size of the packet if it was
longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
With the previous commit we now attempt to reconnect to the
proxy in the beginning of the notify handler if we had no
connection.
If the connection fails later on, we now don't really need
to immediately try to reconnect if we send a default
response anyway (particularly if the recv() fails). (This
also gives the proxy more time, for instance if it was just
restarted.)
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
If a syscall happens after we already failed to communicate
with the proxy, proxy_fd was -1.
Before the previous commit we'd then be stuck in the state
where there was no proxy registered. With the previous
commit we'd send a default reply and only then try to
reconnect.
Improve this even further by trying to reconnect right at
the start.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Particularly, when there's no proxy registered (iow. none
configured but the seccomp profile still had a 'notify'
rule), we don't want to leave them hanging.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
If the first sendmsg() fails, try to reconnect once before
failing. Otherwise if a proxy restarts while no syscall
happens, the next syscall always fails with ENOSYS.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
When we fail to send a message, we send a default seccomp
response and try to reconnect to the proxy. It doesn't
really make much sense to retry to send the request over the
new connection as the syscall has already been answered. The
same goes for receiving the response - after reconnecting to
the proxy, we're a new client to a potentially new proxy
process, so awaiting a response without having sent a
request doesn't make all too much sense either.
In the future we should probably have a timeout or retry
count for the entire proxy _transaction_ before sending a
response to seccomp at all (and probably handle requests
asynchronously).
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
