mirror of
				https://git.proxmox.com/git/mirror_iproute2
				synced 2025-10-31 13:32:34 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			470 lines
		
	
	
		
			16 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			TeX
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			470 lines
		
	
	
		
			16 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			TeX
		
	
	
	
	
	
| \documentstyle[12pt,twoside]{article}
 | |
| \def\TITLE{Tunnels over IP}
 | |
| \input preamble
 | |
| \begin{center}
 | |
| \Large\bf Tunnels over IP in Linux-2.2
 | |
| \end{center}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| \begin{center}
 | |
| { \large Alexey~N.~Kuznetsov } \\
 | |
| \em Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow \\
 | |
| \verb|kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru| \\
 | |
| \rm March 17, 1999
 | |
| \end{center}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \vspace{5mm}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \tableofcontents
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| \section{Instead of introduction: micro-FAQ.}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \begin{itemize}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item
 | |
| Q: In linux-2.0.36 I used:
 | |
| \begin{verbatim} 
 | |
|     ifconfig tunl1 10.0.0.1 pointopoint 193.233.7.65
 | |
| \end{verbatim} 
 | |
| to create tunnel. It does not work in 2.2.0!
 | |
| 
 | |
| A: You are right, it does not work. The command written above is split to two commands.
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|     ip tunnel add MY-TUNNEL mode ipip remote 193.233.7.65
 | |
| \end{verbatim} 
 | |
| will create tunnel device with name \verb|MY-TUNNEL|. Now you may configure
 | |
| it with:
 | |
| \begin{verbatim} 
 | |
|     ifconfig MY-TUNNEL 10.0.0.1
 | |
| \end{verbatim} 
 | |
| Certainly, if you prefer name \verb|tunl1| to \verb|MY-TUNNEL|,
 | |
| you still may use it.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item
 | |
| Q: In linux-2.0.36 I used:
 | |
| \begin{verbatim} 
 | |
|     ifconfig tunl0 10.0.0.1
 | |
|     route add -net 10.0.0.0 gw 193.233.7.65 dev tunl0
 | |
| \end{verbatim} 
 | |
| to tunnel net 10.0.0.0 via router 193.233.7.65. It does not
 | |
| work in 2.2.0! Moreover, \verb|route| prints a funny error sort of
 | |
| ``network unreachable'' and after this I found a strange direct route
 | |
| to 10.0.0.0 via \verb|tunl0| in routing table.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A: Yes, in 2.2 the rule that {\em normal} gateway must reside on directly
 | |
| connected network has not any exceptions. You may tell kernel, that
 | |
| this particular route is {\em abnormal}:
 | |
| \begin{verbatim} 
 | |
|   ifconfig tunl0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255
 | |
|   ip route add 10.0.0.0/8 via 193.233.7.65 dev tunl0 onlink
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| Note keyword \verb|onlink|, it is the magic key that orders kernel
 | |
| not to check for consistency of gateway address.
 | |
| Probably, after this explanation you have already guessed another method
 | |
| to cheat kernel:
 | |
| \begin{verbatim} 
 | |
|   ifconfig tunl0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255
 | |
|   route add -host 193.233.7.65 dev tunl0
 | |
|   route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 gw 193.233.7.65
 | |
|   route del -host 193.233.7.65 dev tunl0
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| Well, if you like such tricks, nobody may prohibit you to use them.
 | |
| Only do not forget
 | |
| that between \verb|route add| and \verb|route del| host 193.233.7.65 is
 | |
| unreachable.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item
 | |
| Q: In 2.0.36 I used to load \verb|tunnel| device module and \verb|ipip| module.
 | |
| I cannot find any \verb|tunnel| in 2.2!
 | |
| 
 | |
| A: Linux-2.2 has single module \verb|ipip| for both directions of tunneling
 | |
| and for all IPIP tunnel devices.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item
 | |
| Q: \verb|traceroute| does not work over tunnel! Well, stop... It works,
 | |
|      only skips some number of hops.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A: Yes. By default tunnel driver copies \verb|ttl| value from
 | |
| inner packet to outer one. It means that path traversed by tunneled
 | |
| packets to another endpoint is not hidden. If you dislike this, or if you
 | |
| are going to use some routing protocol expecting that packets
 | |
| with ttl 1 will reach peering host (f.e.\ RIP, OSPF or EBGP)
 | |
| and you are not afraid of
 | |
| tunnel loops, you may append option \verb|ttl 64|, when creating tunnel
 | |
| with \verb|ip tunnel add|.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item
 | |
| Q: ... Well, list of things, which 2.0 was able to do finishes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \end{itemize}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \paragraph{Summary of differences between 2.2 and 2.0.}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \begin{itemize}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item {\bf In 2.0} you could compile tunnel device into kernel
 | |
| 	and got set of 4 devices \verb|tunl0| ... \verb|tunl3| or,
 | |
| 	alternatively, compile it as module and load new module
 | |
| 	for each new tunnel. Also, module \verb|ipip| was necessary
 | |
| 	to receive tunneled packets.
 | |
| 
 | |
|       {\bf 2.2} has {\em one\/} module \verb|ipip|. Loading it you get base
 | |
| 	tunnel device \verb|tunl0| and another tunnels may be created with command
 | |
| 	\verb|ip tunnel add|. These new devices may have arbitrary names.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item {\bf In 2.0} you set remote tunnel endpoint address with
 | |
| 	the command \verb|ifconfig| ... \verb|pointopoint A|.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	{\bf In 2.2} this command has the same semantics on all
 | |
| 	the interfaces, namely it sets not tunnel endpoint,
 | |
| 	but address of peering host, which is directly reachable
 | |
| 	via this tunnel,
 | |
| 	rather than via Internet. Actual tunnel endpoint address \verb|A|
 | |
| 	should be set with \verb|ip tunnel add ... remote A|.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item {\bf In 2.0} you create tunnel routes with the command:
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|     route add -net 10.0.0.0 gw A dev tunl0
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 	{\bf 2.2} interprets this command equally for all device
 | |
| 	kinds and gateway is required to be directly reachable via this tunnel,
 | |
| 	rather than via Internet. You still may use \verb|ip route add ... onlink|
 | |
| 	to override this behaviour.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \end{itemize}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| \section{Tunnel setup: basics}
 | |
| 
 | |
| Standard Linux-2.2 kernel supports three flavor of tunnels,
 | |
| listed in the following table:
 | |
| \vspace{2mm}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \begin{tabular}{lll}
 | |
| \vrule depth 0.8ex width 0pt\relax
 | |
| Mode & Description  & Base device \\
 | |
| ipip & IP over IP & tunl0 \\
 | |
| sit & IPv6 over IP & sit0 \\
 | |
| gre & ANY over GRE over IP & gre0
 | |
| \end{tabular}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \vspace{2mm}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \noindent All the kinds of tunnels are created with one command:
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|   ip tunnel add <NAME> mode <MODE> [ local <S> ] [ remote <D> ]
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| 
 | |
| This command creates new tunnel device with name \verb|<NAME>|.
 | |
| The \verb|<NAME>| is an arbitrary string. Particularly,
 | |
| it may be even \verb|eth0|. The rest of parameters set
 | |
| different tunnel characteristics.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \begin{itemize}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item
 | |
| \verb|mode <MODE>| sets tunnel mode. Three modes are available now
 | |
| 	\verb|ipip|, \verb|sit| and \verb|gre|.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item
 | |
| \verb|remote <D>| sets remote endpoint of the tunnel to IP
 | |
| 	address \verb|<D>|.
 | |
| \item
 | |
| \verb|local <S>| sets fixed local address for tunneled
 | |
| 	packets. It must be an address on another interface of this host.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \end{itemize}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \let\thefootnote\oldthefootnote
 | |
| 
 | |
| Both \verb|remote| and \verb|local| may be omitted. In this case we
 | |
| say that they are zero or wildcard. Two tunnels of one mode cannot
 | |
| have the same \verb|remote| and \verb|local|. Particularly it means
 | |
| that base device or fallback tunnel cannot be replicated.\footnote{
 | |
| This restriction is relaxed for keyed GRE tunnels.}
 | |
| 
 | |
| Tunnels are divided to two classes: {\bf pointopoint} tunnels, which
 | |
| have some not wildcard \verb|remote| address and deliver all the packets
 | |
| to this destination, and {\bf NBMA} (i.e. Non-Broadcast Multi-Access) tunnels,
 | |
| which have no \verb|remote|. Particularly, base devices (f.e.\ \verb|tunl0|)
 | |
| are NBMA, because they have neither \verb|remote| nor
 | |
| \verb|local| addresses.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| After tunnel device is created you should configure it as you did
 | |
| it with another devices. Certainly, the configuration of tunnels has
 | |
| some features related to the fact that they work over existing Internet
 | |
| routing infrastructure and simultaneously create new virtual links,
 | |
| which changes this infrastructure. The danger that not enough careful
 | |
| tunnel setup will result in formation of tunnel loops,
 | |
| collapse of routing or flooding network with exponentially
 | |
| growing number of tunneled fragments is very real.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Protocol setup on pointopoint tunnels does not differ of configuration
 | |
| of another devices. You should set a protocol address with \verb|ifconfig|
 | |
| and add routes with \verb|route| utility.
 | |
| 
 | |
| NBMA tunnels are different. To route something via NBMA tunnel
 | |
| you have to explain to driver, where it should deliver packets to.
 | |
| The only way to make it is to create special routes with gateway
 | |
| address pointing to desired endpoint. F.e.\ 
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|     ip route add 10.0.0.0/24 via <A> dev tunl0 onlink
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| It is important to use option \verb|onlink|, otherwise
 | |
| kernel will refuse request to create route via gateway not directly
 | |
| reachable over device \verb|tunl0|. With IPv6 the situation is much simpler:
 | |
| when you start device \verb|sit0|, it automatically configures itself
 | |
| with all IPv4 addresses mapped to IPv6 space, so that all IPv4
 | |
| Internet is {\em really reachable} via \verb|sit0|! Excellent, the command
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|     ip route add 3FFE::/16 via ::193.233.7.65 dev sit0
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| will route \verb|3FFE::/16| via \verb|sit0|, sending all the packets
 | |
| destined to this prefix to 193.233.7.65.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \section{Tunnel setup: options}
 | |
| 
 | |
| Command \verb|ip tunnel add| has several additional options.
 | |
| \begin{itemize}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item \verb|ttl N| --- set fixed TTL \verb|N| on tunneled packets.
 | |
| 	\verb|N| is number in the range 1--255. 0 is special value,
 | |
| 	meaning that packets inherit TTL value. 
 | |
| 		Default value is: \verb|inherit|.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item \verb|tos T| --- set fixed tos \verb|T| on tunneled packets.
 | |
| 		Default value is: \verb|inherit|.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item \verb|dev DEV| --- bind tunnel to device \verb|DEV|, so that
 | |
| 	tunneled packets will be routed only via this device and will
 | |
| 	not be able to escape to another device, when route to endpoint changes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item \verb|nopmtudisc| --- disable Path MTU Discovery on this tunnel.
 | |
| 	It is enabled by default. Note that fixed ttl is incompatible
 | |
| 	with this option: tunnels with fixed ttl always make pmtu discovery.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \end{itemize}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \verb|ipip| and \verb|sit| tunnels have no more options. \verb|gre|
 | |
| tunnels are more complicated:
 | |
| 
 | |
| \begin{itemize}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item \verb|key K| --- use keyed GRE with key \verb|K|. \verb|K| is
 | |
| 	either number or IP address-like dotted quad.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item \verb|csum| --- checksum tunneled packets.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item \verb|seq| --- serialize packets.
 | |
| \begin{NB}
 | |
| 	I think this option does not
 | |
| 	work. At least, I did not test it, did not debug it and
 | |
| 	even do not understand,	how it is supposed to work and for what
 | |
| 	purpose Cisco planned to use it.
 | |
| \end{NB}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \end{itemize}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Actually, these GRE options can be set separately for input and
 | |
| output directions by prefixing corresponding keywords with letter
 | |
| \verb|i| or \verb|o|. F.e.\ \verb|icsum| orders to accept only
 | |
| packets with correct checksum and \verb|ocsum| means, that
 | |
| our host will calculate and send checksum.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Command \verb|ip tunnel add| is not the only operation,
 | |
| which can be made with tunnels. Certainly, you may get short help page
 | |
| with:
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|     ip tunnel help
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| 
 | |
| Besides that, you may view list of installed tunnels with the help of command:
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|     ip tunnel ls
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| Also you may look at statistics:
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|     ip -s tunnel ls Cisco
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| where \verb|Cisco| is name of tunnel device. Command
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|     ip tunnel del Cisco
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| destroys tunnel \verb|Cisco|. And, finally,
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|     ip tunnel change Cisco mode sit local ME remote HE ttl 32
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| changes its parameters.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \section{Differences 2.2 and 2.0 tunnels revisited.}
 | |
| 
 | |
| Now we can discuss more subtle differences between tunneling in 2.0
 | |
| and 2.2.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \begin{itemize}
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item In 2.0 all tunneled packets were received promiscuously
 | |
| as soon as you loaded module \verb|ipip|. 2.2 tries to select the best
 | |
| tunnel device and packet looks as received on this. F.e.\ if host
 | |
| received \verb|ipip| packet from host \verb|D| destined to our
 | |
| local address \verb|S|, kernel searches for matching tunnels
 | |
| in order:
 | |
| 
 | |
| \begin{tabular}{ll}
 | |
| 1 & \verb|remote| is \verb|D| and \verb|local| is \verb|S| \\
 | |
| 2 & \verb|remote| is \verb|D| and \verb|local| is wildcard \\
 | |
| 3 & \verb|remote| is wildcard and \verb|local| is \verb|S| \\
 | |
| 4 & \verb|tunl0|
 | |
| \end{tabular}
 | |
| 
 | |
| If tunnel exists, but it is not in \verb|UP| state, the tunnel is ignored.
 | |
| Note, that if \verb|tunl0| is \verb|UP| it receives all the IPIP packets,
 | |
| not acknowledged by more specific tunnels.
 | |
| Be careful, it means that without carefully installed firewall rules
 | |
| anyone on the Internet may inject to your network any packets with
 | |
| source addresses indistinguishable from local ones. It is not so bad idea
 | |
| to design tunnels in the way enforcing maximal route symmetry
 | |
| and to enable reversed path filter (\verb|rp_filter| sysctl option) on
 | |
| tunnel devices.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \item In 2.2 you can monitor and debug tunnels with \verb|tcpdump|.
 | |
| F.e.\ \verb|tcpdump| \verb|-i Cisco| \verb|-nvv| will dump packets,
 | |
| which kernel output, via tunnel \verb|Cisco| and the packets received on it
 | |
| from kernel viewpoint.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \end{itemize}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| \section{Linux and Cisco IOS tunnels.}
 | |
| 
 | |
| Among another tunnels Cisco IOS supports IPIP and GRE.
 | |
| Essentially, Cisco setup is subset of options, available for Linux.
 | |
| Let us consider the simplest example:
 | |
| 
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
| interface Tunnel0
 | |
|  tunnel mode gre ip
 | |
|  tunnel source 10.10.14.1
 | |
|  tunnel destination 10.10.13.2
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| This command set translates to:
 | |
| 
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|     ip tunnel add Tunnel0 \
 | |
|         mode gre \
 | |
|         local 10.10.14.1 \
 | |
|         remote 10.10.13.2
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| 
 | |
| Any questions? No questions.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \section{Interaction IPIP tunnels and DVMRP.}
 | |
| 
 | |
| DVMRP exploits IPIP tunnels to route multicasts via Internet.
 | |
| \verb|mrouted| creates
 | |
| IPIP tunnels listed in its configuration file automatically.
 | |
| From kernel and user viewpoints there are no differences between
 | |
| tunnels, created in this way, and tunnels created by \verb|ip tunnel|.
 | |
| I.e.\ if \verb|mrouted| created some tunnel, it may be used to
 | |
| route unicast packets, provided appropriate routes are added.
 | |
| And vice versa, if administrator has already created a tunnel,
 | |
| it will be reused by \verb|mrouted|, if it requests DVMRP
 | |
| tunnel with the same local and remote addresses.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Do not wonder, if your manually configured tunnel is
 | |
| destroyed, when mrouted exits.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| \section{Broadcast GRE ``tunnels''.}
 | |
| 
 | |
| It is possible to set \verb|remote| for GRE tunnel to a multicast
 | |
| address. Such tunnel becomes {\bf broadcast} tunnel (though word
 | |
| tunnel is not quite appropriate in this case, it is rather virtual network).
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|   ip tunnel add Universe local 193.233.7.65 \
 | |
|                          remote 224.66.66.66 ttl 16
 | |
|   ip addr add 10.0.0.1/16 dev Universe
 | |
|   ip link set Universe up
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| This tunnel is true broadcast network and broadcast packets are
 | |
| sent to multicast group 224.66.66.66. By default such tunnel starts
 | |
| to resolve both IP and IPv6 addresses via ARP/NDISC, so that
 | |
| if multicast routing is supported in surrounding network, all GRE nodes
 | |
| will find one another automatically and will form virtual Ethernet-like
 | |
| broadcast network. If multicast routing does not work, it is unpleasant
 | |
| but not fatal flaw. The tunnel becomes NBMA rather than broadcast network.
 | |
| You may disable dynamic ARPing by:
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|   echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/neigh/Universe/mcast_solicit
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| and to add required information to ARP tables manually:
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|   ip neigh add 10.0.0.2 lladdr 128.6.190.2 dev Universe nud permanent
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| In this case packets sent to 10.0.0.2 will be encapsulated in GRE
 | |
| and sent to 128.6.190.2. It is possible to facilitate address resolution
 | |
| using methods typical for another NBMA networks f.e.\ to start user
 | |
| level \verb|arpd| daemon, which will maintain database of hosts attached
 | |
| to GRE virtual network or ask for information
 | |
| dedicated ARP or NHRP server.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Actually, such setup is the most natural for tunneling,
 | |
| it is really flexible, scalable and easily managable, so that
 | |
| it is strongly recommended to be used with GRE tunnels instead of ugly
 | |
| hack with NBMA mode and \verb|onlink| modifier. Unfortunately,
 | |
| by historical reasons broadcast mode is not supported by IPIP tunnels,
 | |
| but this probably will change in future.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| \section{Traffic control issues.}
 | |
| 
 | |
| Tunnels are devices, hence all the power of Linux traffic control
 | |
| applies to them. The simplest (and the most useful in practice)
 | |
| example is limiting tunnel bandwidth. The following command:
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|     tc qdisc add dev tunl0 root tbf \
 | |
|         rate 128Kbit burst 4K limit 10K
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| will limit tunneled traffic to 128Kbit with maximal burst size of 4K
 | |
| and queuing not more than 10K.
 | |
| 
 | |
| However, you should remember, that tunnels are {\em virtual} devices
 | |
| implemented in software and true queue management is impossible for them
 | |
| just because they have no queues. Instead, it is better to create classes
 | |
| on real physical interfaces and to map tunneled packets to them.
 | |
| In general case of dynamic routing you should create such classes
 | |
| on all outgoing interfaces, or, alternatively,
 | |
| to use option \verb|dev DEV| to bind tunnel to a fixed physical device.
 | |
| In the last case packets will be routed only via specified device
 | |
| and you need to setup corresponding classes only on it.
 | |
| Though you have to pay for this convenience,
 | |
| if routing will change, your tunnel will fail.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Suppose that CBQ class \verb|1:ABC| has been created on device \verb|eth0| 
 | |
| specially for tunnel \verb|Cisco| with endpoints \verb|S| and \verb|D|.
 | |
| Now you can select IPIP packets with addresses \verb|S| and \verb|D|
 | |
| with some classifier and map them to class \verb|1:ABC|. F.e.\ 
 | |
| it is easy to make with \verb|rsvp| classifier:
 | |
| \begin{verbatim}
 | |
|     tc filter add dev eth0 pref 100 proto ip rsvp \
 | |
|         session D ipproto ipip filter S \
 | |
|         classid 1:ABC
 | |
| \end{verbatim}
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you want to make more detailed classification of sub-flows
 | |
| transmitted via tunnel, you can build CBQ subtree,
 | |
| rooted at \verb|1:ABC| and attach to subroot set of rules parsing
 | |
| IPIP packets more deeply.
 | |
| 
 | |
| \end{document}
 | 
