Add some `pragma`s to handle errors that the C/C++ extension is not able
to understand.
Move `TRANSPARENT_UNION` to `lib/compiler.h` for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
If we enable MPLS for an interface via sysctl, we should write `mpls enable`,
not `mpls`.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Since the `echo PING` commands are from watchfrr and are sent
a whole bunch when an operator has `log commands` on the amount
of logging done is quite significant.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The recent tracepoint additions in c317d3f246
did not properly setup the tracepoints for lttng. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Simplify all DEFUNs by moving all logic to the northbound translation
function and transforming all function parameters into a single
structure.
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Commit 8f359e1593 removed a check that prevented the same route
from being added twice. In certain topologies, that change resulted in
the following infinite loop when adding an ASBR route:
ospf6_route_add
ospf6_top_brouter_hook_add
ospf6_abr_examin_brouter
ospf6_abr_examin_summary
ospf6_route_add
(repeat until stack overflow)
Revert the offending commit and update `ospf6_route_is_identical()` to
not do comparison using `memcmp()`.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
Before this patch, data is flushed, and we can't see the data after we send
the notification.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
The imported BFD code had some logic to ignore the source address when
using single hop IPv4. The BFD peer socket function should allow the
source to be selected so we can:
1. Select the source address in the outgoing packets
2. Only receive packets from that specific source
Signed-off-by: Rafael Zalamena <rzalamena@opensourcerouting.org>
Previous commit changes the order of srv6 locator parameters. So, this
PR reflect the previous changes.
Signed-off-by: Ryoga Saito <ryoga.saito@linecorp.com>
There might be use cases when this would make sense, for example
running FRR in a container as a designated user.
Signed-off-by: Michal Ruprich <mruprich@redhat.com>
We must disable the vrf before we start terminating interfaces.
On termination, we free the 'zebra_if' struct from the interface ->info
pointer. We rely on that for subsystems like vxlan for cleanup when
shutting down.
'''
==497406== Invalid read of size 8
==497406== at 0x47E70A: zebra_evpn_del (zebra_evpn.c:1103)
==497406== by 0x47F004: zebra_evpn_cleanup_all (zebra_evpn.c:1363)
==497406== by 0x4F2404: zebra_evpn_vxlan_cleanup_all (zebra_vxlan.c:1158)
==497406== by 0x4917041: hash_iterate (hash.c:267)
==497406== by 0x4F25E2: zebra_vxlan_cleanup_tables (zebra_vxlan.c:5676)
==497406== by 0x4D52EC: zebra_vrf_disable (zebra_vrf.c:209)
==497406== by 0x49A247F: vrf_disable (vrf.c:340)
==497406== by 0x49A2521: vrf_delete (vrf.c:245)
==497406== by 0x49A2E2B: vrf_terminate_single (vrf.c:533)
==497406== by 0x49A2D8F: vrf_terminate (vrf.c:561)
==497406== by 0x441240: sigint (main.c:192)
==497406== by 0x4981F6D: frr_sigevent_process (sigevent.c:130)
==497406== Address 0x6d68c68 is 200 bytes inside a block of size 272 free'd
==497406== at 0x48470E4: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:872)
==497406== by 0x4942CF0: qfree (memory.c:141)
==497406== by 0x49196A9: if_delete (if.c:293)
==497406== by 0x491C54C: if_terminate (if.c:1031)
==497406== by 0x49A2E22: vrf_terminate_single (vrf.c:532)
==497406== by 0x49A2D8F: vrf_terminate (vrf.c:561)
==497406== by 0x441240: sigint (main.c:192)
==497406== by 0x4981F6D: frr_sigevent_process (sigevent.c:130)
==497406== by 0x499A5F0: thread_fetch (thread.c:1775)
==497406== by 0x492850E: frr_run (libfrr.c:1197)
==497406== by 0x441746: main (main.c:476)
==497406== Block was alloc'd at
==497406== at 0x4849464: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1328)
==497406== by 0x49429A5: qcalloc (memory.c:116)
==497406== by 0x491D971: if_new (if.c:174)
==497406== by 0x491ACC8: if_create_name (if.c:228)
==497406== by 0x491ABEB: if_get_by_name (if.c:613)
==497406== by 0x427052: netlink_interface (if_netlink.c:1178)
==497406== by 0x43BC18: netlink_parse_info (kernel_netlink.c:1188)
==497406== by 0x4266D7: interface_lookup_netlink (if_netlink.c:1288)
==497406== by 0x42B634: interface_list (if_netlink.c:2368)
==497406== by 0x4ABF83: zebra_ns_enable (zebra_ns.c:127)
==497406== by 0x4AC17E: zebra_ns_init (zebra_ns.c:216)
==497406== by 0x44166C: main (main.c:408)
'''
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
This commit adds a basic test for sharpd traffic control PoC, which will check
interface TC info from iproute2 `tc` cli.
Signed-off-by: Siger Yang <siger.yang@outlook.com>
This commit adds a command to sharpd to validate the proof of concept for
traffic control on specific interface with specific filters.
Signed-off-by: Siger Yang <siger.yang@outlook.com>
This commit adds ZAPI encoders & decoders for traffic control operations, which
include tc_qdisc, tc_class and tc_filter.
Signed-off-by: Siger Yang <siger.yang@outlook.com>
This allows Zebra to manage QDISC, TCLASS, TFILTER in kernel and do cleaning
jobs when it starts up.
Signed-off-by: Siger Yang <siger.yang@outlook.com>
The latest FRR's frr-reload.py is broken and we can't reload FRR
gracefully with segment routing locator configuration (if we
execute frr-reload.py, FRR will stop suddenly).
The root cause of this issue is very simple. FRR will display the
current configuration like this (the below is the result of
"show running-configuration").
``
segment-routing
srv6
locators
locator default
prefix fd00:1:0:1::/64 block-len 40 node-len 24 func-bits 16
exit
!
exit
!
exit
!
exit
```
However, FRR doesn't accept segment routing locator parameters
if we specify block-len and node-len earlier than func-bits.
Signed-off-by: Ryoga Saito <ryoga.saito@linecorp.com>
Description:
As part of signal handler ospf_finish_final(), lsas are originated
and added to refresh queues are not freed.
One such leak is :
==2869285== 432 (40 direct, 392 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 159 of 221
==2869285== at 0x484DA83: calloc (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==2869285== by 0x4910EC3: qcalloc (memory.c:116)
==2869285== by 0x199024: ospf_refresher_register_lsa (ospf_lsa.c:4017)
==2869285== by 0x199024: ospf_refresher_register_lsa (ospf_lsa.c:3979)
==2869285== by 0x19A37F: ospf_network_lsa_install (ospf_lsa.c:2680)
==2869285== by 0x19A37F: ospf_lsa_install (ospf_lsa.c:2941)
==2869285== by 0x19C18F: ospf_network_lsa_update (ospf_lsa.c:1099)
==2869285== by 0x1931ED: ism_change_state (ospf_ism.c:556)
==2869285== by 0x1931ED: ospf_ism_event (ospf_ism.c:596)
==2869285== by 0x494E0B0: thread_call (thread.c:2006)
==2869285== by 0x494E395: _thread_execute (thread.c:2098)
==2869285== by 0x19FBC6: nsm_change_state (ospf_nsm.c:695)
==2869285== by 0x19FBC6: ospf_nsm_event (ospf_nsm.c:861)
==2869285== by 0x494E0B0: thread_call (thread.c:2006)
==2869285== by 0x494E395: _thread_execute (thread.c:2098)
==2869285== by 0x19020B: ospf_if_cleanup (ospf_interface.c:322)
==2869285== by 0x192D0C: ism_interface_down (ospf_ism.c:393)
==2869285== by 0x193028: ospf_ism_event (ospf_ism.c:584)
==2869285== by 0x494E0B0: thread_call (thread.c:2006)
==2869285== by 0x494E395: _thread_execute (thread.c:2098)
==2869285== by 0x190F10: ospf_if_down (ospf_interface.c:851)
==2869285== by 0x1911D6: ospf_if_free (ospf_interface.c:341)
==2869285== by 0x1E6E98: ospf_finish_final (ospfd.c:748)
==2869285== by 0x1E6E98: ospf_deferred_shutdown_finish (ospfd.c:578)
==2869285== by 0x1E7727: ospf_finish (ospfd.c:682)
==2869285== by 0x1E7727: ospf_terminate (ospfd.c:652)
==2869285== by 0x18852B: sigint (ospf_main.c:105)
==2869285== by 0x493BE12: frr_sigevent_process (sigevent.c:130)
==2869285== by 0x494DCD4: thread_fetch (thread.c:1775)
==2869285== by 0x4905022: frr_run (libfrr.c:1197)
==2869285== by 0x187891: main (ospf_main.c:235)
Added a fix to cleanup all these queue pointers and corresponing lsas in it.
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Girada <rgirada@vmware.com>
This is for run_and_expect_type and run_and_expect topotests method.
Some contributions unintentionally get merged with very low values, that leads
to CI failures, let's guard this a bit.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
As per RFC 7761, Section 4.9.1
The RPT (or Rendezvous Point Tree) bit is a 1-bit value for use
with PIM Join/Prune messages (see Section 4.9.5.1). If the
WC bit is 1, the RPT bit MUST be 1.
ANVL conformance test case is trying to verify this and is failing.
Issue: #12354
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
As per RFC 7761, Section 4.9.1
The RPT (or Rendezvous Point Tree) bit is a 1-bit value for use
with PIM Join/Prune messages (see Section 4.9.5.1). If the
WC bit is 1, the RPT bit MUST be 1.
ANVL conformance test case is trying to verify this and is failing.
Issue: #12354
Signed-off-by: Mobashshera Rasool <mrasool@vmware.com>
