The debug for notification about a filtered prefix was
just printing the nexthop ifindex and vrf id. Not all
nexthops have this data. Just print out the actual nexthop
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Currently, the SID transposition algorithm implemented in bgpd handles
incorrectly the SRv6 locators with function length greater than 20 bits.
To prevent issues, we currently limit the function length to 20 bits.
This limit will be removed when the bgpd SID transposition is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
According to RFC 8986, the SRv6 SID length cannot exceed 128 bits. This
commit ensures that the condition
`block_len + node_len + function_len + arg_len <= 128` is satisfied when
a new SRv6 locator is created.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
This commit adds SRv6 locator's block length, node length and argument
length to the output of the command
"show segment-routing srv6 locator NAME detail [json]".
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
This commit adds the SRv6 locator's block length, node length and
argument length to the SRv6 configuration.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
In the current implementation, an SRv6 locator only supports the
following structure:
* node-len = 24
* block-len = prefix-len - 24
* function-len = <configurable>
* argument-len = 0
This commit adds two optional arguments to the locator_prefix CLI
command: "node-len" and "block-len". These arguments allows an user to
configure the block length and node length of a SRv6 locator according
to the following logic:
* the node-len + block-len = prefix-len constraint must always be
satisfied;
* if node-len and block-len are both omitted, they are calculated as in
the current implementation (for backward compatibility reasons)
* if node-len is omitted, its value is computed as
prefix-len - block-len
* if block-len is omitted, its value is computed as
prefix-len - node-len
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Daemons like isisd continue to use the previous link-params after they
are removed from zebra.
For example,
>r0# sh run zebra
> (...)
> interface eth-rt1
> link-params
> enable
> metric 100
> exit-link-params
> r0# conf
> r0(config)# interface eth-rt1
> r0(config-if)# link-params
> r0(config-link-params)# no enable
After "no enable", "sh run zebra" displays no more link-params context.
The "no enable" causes the release of the "link_params" pointer within
the "interface" structure. The zebra function to update daemons with
a ZEBRA_INTERFACE_LINK_PARAMS zapi message is called but the function
returns without doing anything because the "link_params" pointer is
NULL. Therefore, the "link_params" pointers are kept in daemons.
When the zebra "link_params" pointer is NULL:
- Send a zapi link param message that contains no link parameters
instead of sending no message.
- At reception in daemons, the absence of link parameters causes the
release of the "link_params" pointer.
Fixes: 16f1b9e ("Update Traffic Engineering Support for OSPFD")
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
A given interface has no enabled link-params context. If a link-params
configuration command fails, the link-params is wrongly enabled:
> r4(config-link-params)# no enable
> r4(config-link-params)# delay
> (0-16777215) Average delay in micro-second as decimal (0...16777215)
> r4(config-link-params)# delay 50 min 300 max 500
> Average delay should be comprise between Min (300) and Max (500) delay
> r4(config-link-params)# do sh run zebra
> (...)
> interface eth-rt1
> link-params
> enable
> exit-link-params
link-params are enabled if and only if the interface structure has a
valid link_params pointer. Before checking the command validity,
if_link_params_get() is called to retrieve the link-params pointer.
However, this function initializes the pointer if it is NULL.
Only use if_link_params_get() to retrieve the pointer to avoid
confusion. In command setting functions, initialize the link_params
pointer if needed only after the validation of the command.
Fixes: 16f1b9e ("Update Traffic Engineering Support for OSPFD")
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
There are lib debugs being set but never show up in
`show debug` commands because there was no way to show
that they were being used. Add a bit of infrastructure
to allow this and then use it for `debug route-map`
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
In order to set function length of SID freely, this PR relieves the
lower limitation of `func-bits`.
Signed-off-by: Ryoga Saito <ryoga.saito@linecorp.com>
Add default SRv6 Function Length for usecases like SRv6 L3VPN. The
default value (16) comes from the default Function length for SRv6
L3VPN in BGPd.
Signed-off-by: Ryoga Saito <ryoga.saito@linecorp.com>
When zebra requests tunnel data it is sending a RTM_GETTUNNEL per
interface that is a VXLAN tunnel. If the kernel that is being
used does not support the particular request type then zebra
will get a error message per tunnel request back. Unfortunately
netlink_parse_info *stops* reading on the first error message.
Therefor one kernels that are returning an error message
let's gather all of those errors. This will allow things
like route reads to actually work properly
Fixes: #12056
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Section 6.2.7 of RFC 4861 states that a router SHOULD log
inconsistencies in RA information detected on a given link:
```
- Cur Hop Limit values (except for the unspecified value of zero
other inconsistencies SHOULD be logged to system network
management).
- Values of the M or O flags.
- Reachable Time values (except for the unspecified value of zero).
- Retrans Timer values (except for the unspecified value of zero).
- Values in the MTU options.
- Preferred and Valid Lifetimes for the same prefix. If
AdvPreferredLifetime and/or AdvValidLifetime decrement in real
time as specified in Section 6.2.1 then the comparison of the
lifetimes cannot compare the content of the fields in the Router
Advertisement, but must instead compare the time at which the
prefix will become deprecated and invalidated, respectively. Due
to link propagation delays and potentially poorly synchronized
clocks between the routers such comparison SHOULD allow some time
skew.
```
We were not logging inconsistencies if "the unspecified value of zero"
was used for Reachable Time but were logging them for Retrans Timer.
This updates the validation check to also skip the logging of Retrans
Timer inconsistencies if either local/rx value is 0.
Signed-off-by: Trey Aspelund <taspelund@nvidia.com>
When we process a received Router Advertisement we have some logic in
place to detect and log mismatches in a handful of flags/values.
However, these logs do not include what the actual values are, which
means it's up to the operator to grab a packet capture and compare that
against the local configuration...
So let's make life a little easier by including those in the log itself.
Before:
```
2022/09/30 20:37:16 ZEBRA: [KV2V1-7GM7G][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvCurHopLimit doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:feca:b085
2022/09/30 20:37:16 ZEBRA: [KS0BP-4GR8K][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvManagedFlag doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:feca:b085
2022/09/30 20:37:16 ZEBRA: [RE4EC-VYEJ2][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvOtherConfigFlag doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:feca:b085
2022/09/30 20:37:16 ZEBRA: [X6794-9MW18][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvReachableTime doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:feca:b085
2022/09/30 20:37:16 ZEBRA: [S1KXC-H8F4W][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvRetransTimer doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:feca:b085
```
After:
```
Sep 30 20:45:18 ub20-2 zebra[47487]: [GSW5Z-V7DZN][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvCurHopLimit (14) doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:fe9a:e2ca (64)
Sep 30 20:45:18 ub20-2 zebra[47487]: [RHHTS-F96DR][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvManagedFlag (0) doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:fe9a:e2ca (1)
Sep 30 20:45:18 ub20-2 zebra[47487]: [MNBY3-FTN6W][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvOtherConfigFlag (0) doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:fe9a:e2ca (1)
Sep 30 20:45:18 ub20-2 zebra[47487]: [GG62B-XXWR0][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvReachableTime (20) doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:fe9a:e2ca (777)
Sep 30 20:45:18 ub20-2 zebra[47487]: [YG220-D6B4H][EC 4043309149] enp1s0(2): Rx RA - our AdvRetransTimer (13) doesn't agree with fe80::5054:ff:fe9a:e2ca (0)
```
Signed-off-by: Trey Aspelund <taspelund@nvidia.com>
Fix issue#11996.
When removing VRF ( all routes of this VRF), zebra mistakenly forgot to check
whether its routes are in update queue of FPM. So FPM module will crash during
its dealing with these routes, which are already freed.
Add a new HOOK `rib_shutdown()`, `zebra_rtable_node_cleanup()` will use it
to remove these routes from update queue of FPM module before freeing them.
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <vic.lan@pica8.com>
To resolve link dependencies of unordered interfaces, the commit
`520ebf72b27c2462ce8b0dc5a1d4cb83956df69c` has separated assignment of
`zif->link_ifindex` and `zif->link` from `netlink_interface()` during startup.
The fixup stage of `zebra_if_update_all_links()` goes into the last of
`interface_lookup_netlink()`, it can't be executed in the case of error in
above `netlink_parse_info()`s.
`RTM_GETTUNNEL` is not supported in linux kernel until 5.18, so
`netlink_parse_info()` will throw error with the previous versions.
If two conditions are met, (it is a common case)
1. Interfaces are created before frr restart/start
2. Linux kernel version < 5.18
the link dependencies will not be done, then evpn feature will be broken.
IMO we should just ignore this error.
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <vic.lan@pica8.com>
When using namespace VRF backend, and frr.conf contains:
vrf test
netns /run/netns/test
exit-vrf
FRR fails to start:
line 11: Failure to communicate[13] to zebra, line: netns /run/netns/test
Fix this by returning CMD_WARNING rather than CMD_WARNING_CONFIG_FAILED
when the same netns path is configured.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@gmail.com>
zebra can change l2vni's tenant vrf with new `vid`, and then notify bgpd
to change also. But this notification is wrongly missed, so bgpd knows
nothing about it. It affects evpn routes, which are related to tenant vrf.
Need to notify bgpd of the `vid` change.
Changes l2vni 100 of vxlan's `vid` so as to change its svi interface from
default to vrf1, then check bgp's vni status.
Before: (Ignored irrelevent columns)
```
host#show bgp l2vpn evpn vni
VNI Type RD Tenant VRF
* 100 L2 66.66.66.66:2 default <- No change
```
After:(Ignored irrelevent columns)
```
host#show bgp l2vpn evpn vni
VNI Type RD Tenant VRF
* 100 L2 66.66.66.66:2 vrf1 <- Updated
```
Signed-off-by: anlan_cs <vic.lan@pica8.com>
Running `srv6_locator` topotest with `--valgrind-memleaks` gives several
memory leak errors. This is due to the way SRv6 locators are deleted:
when an SRv6 locator is deleted, it is removed from the SRv6 locators
list (`srv6->locators`), but the memory allocated for the SRv6 locator
is not freed.
This patch adds a call to the `srv6_locator_free()` function to properly
free the allocated memory when an SRv6 locator is removed.
Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
In kernel_socket.c, the code is deleting and then adding
the route back in on a change operation. This just translates
too two re's, one for deletion and one for addition. The deletion
will just be ignored. Let's not do the extra deletion.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The new route code path was using a combination of
both rib_add() and rib_add_multipath() let's clean
it up some to use rib_add_multipath()
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Currently if an operator does this operation:
sharpd@eva ~/frr8> sudo ip nexthop add id 5000 via 192.168.119.44 dev enp39s0 ; sudo ip route add 10.0.0.1 nhid 5000
2022/06/30 08:52:40 ZEBRA: [ZHQK5-J9M1R] proto2zebra: Please add this protocol(0) to proper rt_netlink.c handling
2022/06/30 08:52:40 ZEBRA: [PS16P-365FK][EC 4043309076] Zebra failed to find the nexthop hash entry for id=5000 in a route entry
sharpd@eva ~/frr8> vtysh -c "show ip route 10.0.0.1"
Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0
Known via "kernel", distance 0, metric 100, best
Last update 00:01:58 ago
* 192.168.119.1, via enp39s0
The route is dropped by zebra with no warnings. This is not good,
but unlikely to happen at this point in time. In order to fix
this issue route processing from inputs needs to happen after nexthop
group processing from inputs. This was not possible because
nexthop groups are placed on the metaQ. As such the above
nexthop group creation is placed on the metaQ for processing
in META_QUEUE_NHG. Then the route is read in and processed
immediately. The nexthop group is not found ( not processed yet!)
and the route is dropped in zebra.
Modify the code to have early route processing of validity
on the MetaQ. This preserves the order of operations.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Convert label processing that comes from zapi messages
into being handled by the meta-Q. This is because early
route processing is going to be moved to the meta-Q as
well and we will have a chicken and egg problem without
moving this code to be processed by the meta-Q.
Ordering of messages from ospf as an example:
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:48] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:48] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:48] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:48] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:62] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:43] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:61] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_ROUTE_ADD:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_MPLS_LABELS_REPLACE:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_MPLS_LABELS_REPLACE:0:66] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_MPLS_LABELS_REPLACE:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_MPLS_LABELS_REPLACE:0:47] comes from socket [36]
2022/08/09 08:55:52.740 ZEBRA: [YXG8K-BCYMV] zebra message[ZEBRA_MPLS_LABELS_REPLACE:0:47] comes from socket [36]
The ZEBRA_MPLS_LABELS_REPLACE immediately turn around and attempt to replace nexthop labels on routes that
were added. If the route add is placed on the metaQ, it will not exist yet and as such the label replace
will fail.
Modify the zebra code to take the label operations and place them on the metaQ as well.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
