Even if some of the attributes in bgp_path_info_extra are
not used, their memory is still allocated every time. It
cause a waste of memory.
This commit code deletes all unnecessary attributes and
changes the optional attributes to pointer storage. Memory
will only be allocated when they are actually used. After
optimization, extra info related memory is reduced by about
half(~400B -> ~200B).
Signed-off-by: Valerian_He <1826906282@qq.com>
Coverity is complaining that listnode can return a NULL
value and thus FRR could derefence the returned value.
Since this is not crashing we know that this is not happening
in the wild. Let's make this an assert or check that it is
legal to use the value.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The usage of bgp_vrf does not need to be tested
at this point since it's already been derefed in all
paths to this point.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
A route-map applied on incoming BGP updates is not able
to replace an unwanted as segments by another one.
unwanted as segment are based on an AS path access-list.
The below configuration illustrates the case:
router bgp 65001
address-family ipv4 unicast
neighbor 192.168.1.2 route-map rule_2 in
exit-address-family
bgp as-path access-list RULE permit ^65
route-map rule_2 permit 10
set as-path replace as-path-access-list RULE 6000
```
BGP routing table entry for 10.10.10.10/32, version 13
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
Advertised to non peer-group peers:
192.168.10.65
65000 1 2 3 123
192.168.10.65 from 192.168.10.65 (10.10.10.11)
Origin IGP, metric 0, valid, external, best (First path received)
```
After:
```
do show ip bgp 10.10.10.10/32
BGP routing table entry for 10.10.10.10/32, version 15
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
Advertised to non peer-group peers:
192.168.10.65
6000 1 2 3 123
192.168.10.65 from 192.168.10.65 (10.10.10.11)
Origin IGP, metric 0, valid, external, best (First path
received)
```
Signed-off-by: Francois Dumontet <francois.dumontet@6wind.com>
Add this logic inside bgp_capability_send() instead of repeating the whole
logic before calling bgp_capability_send().
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
When setting local-role for the neighbor, force sending ROLE capability via
dynamic capability if it's enabled.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
vtysh is not supposed to show empty interface node in running config,
however the corresponding check is broken and empty nodes are shown.
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
isis_snmp.test_isis_snmp/r1/ldpd.log:2023/08/04 12:49:54 LDP: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 8: agentx
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
babel_topo1.test_babel_topo1/r3/babeld.log:2023/08/04 12:46:55 BABELD: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 17: redistirbute ipv6 connected
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
./config_timing.test_config_timing/r1/zebra.log:2023/08/04 12:34:29 ZEBRA: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 7: exit-route-map
./config_timing.test_config_timing/r1/zebra.log:2023/08/04 12:34:29 ZEBRA: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 10: exit-route-map
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
./bfd_ospf_topo1.test_bfd_ospf_topo1/rt3/ospfd.log:2023/08/04 12:46:58 OSPF: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 28: passive interface lo
./bfd_ospf_topo1.test_bfd_ospf_topo1/rt5/ospfd.log:2023/08/04 12:46:59 OSPF: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 27: passive interface lo
./bfd_ospf_topo1.test_bfd_ospf_topo1/rt1/ospfd.log:2023/08/04 12:46:56 OSPF: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 30: passive interface lo
./bfd_ospf_topo1.test_bfd_ospf_topo1/rt4/ospfd.log:2023/08/04 12:47:00 OSPF: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 27: passive interface lo
./bfd_ospf_topo1.test_bfd_ospf_topo1/rt2/ospfd.log:2023/08/04 12:46:57 OSPF: [SHWNK-NWT5S][EC 100663304] No such command on config line 28: passive interface lo
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The test was reading in the bgp config for the isis config and
clearly the test is working without this. So let's remove
from the test the usage of isisd
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
When displaying the configuration, the order of nexthop-vrf is wrong,
because the default VRF is not displayed, but still compared as the word
"default". Therefore it is placed in the middle of the list instead of
always being the first one.
Before the fix:
```
ip route 1.1.1.0/24 2.2.2.2 nexthop-vrf ccc
ip route 1.1.1.0/24 2.2.2.2
ip route 1.1.1.0/24 2.2.2.2 nexthop-vrf eee
```
After the fix:
```
ip route 1.1.1.0/24 2.2.2.2
ip route 1.1.1.0/24 2.2.2.2 nexthop-vrf ccc
ip route 1.1.1.0/24 2.2.2.2 nexthop-vrf eee
```
Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
Gonna be covered later with further PRs. Now adding them to avoid compiler
errors due to uncovered switch/cases.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
