Reuse subgroup_process_announce_selected(). It does the same as we do here
duplicating the logic.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
This commit introduces a new method to associate a label to
prefixes to export to a VPNv4 backbone. All the methods to
associate a label to a BGP update is documented in rfc4364,
chapter 4.3.2. Initially, the "single label for an entire
VRF" method was available. This commit adds "single label
for each attachment circuit" method.
The change impacts the control-plane, because each BGP update
is checked to know if the nexthop has reachability in the VRF
or not. If this is the case, then a unique label for a given
destination IP in the VRF will be picked up. This label will
be reused for an other BGP update that will have the same
nexthop IP address.
The change impacts the data-plane, because the MPLs pop
mechanism applied to incoming labelled packets changes: the
MPLS label is popped, and the packet is directly sent to the
connected nexthop described in the previous outgoing BGP VPN
update.
By default per-vrf mode is done, but the user may choose
the per-nexthop mode, by using the vty command from the
previous commit. In the latter case, a per-vrf label
will however be allocated to handle networks that are not directly
connected. This is the case for local traffic for instance.
The change also include the following:
- ECMP case
In case a route is learnt in a given VRF, and is resolved via an
ECMP nexthop. This implies that when exporting the route as a BGP
update, if label allocation per nexthop is used, then two possible
MPLS values could be picked up, which is not possible with the
current implementation. Actually, the NLRI for VPNv4 stores one
prefix, and one single label value, not two. Today, RFC8277 with
multiple label capability is not yet available.
To avoid this corner case, when a route is resolved via more than one
nexthop, the label allocation per nexthop will not apply, and the
default per-vrf label will be chosen.
Let us imagine BGP redistributes a static route using the `172.31.0.20`
nexthop. The nexthop resolution will find two different nexthops fo a
unique BGP update.
> r1# show running-config
> [..]
> vrf vrf1
> ip route 172.31.0.30/32 172.31.0.20
> r1# show bgp vrf vrf1 nexthop
> [..]
> 172.31.0.20 valid [IGP metric 0], #paths 1
> gate 192.0.2.11
> gate 192.0.2.12
> Last update: Mon Jan 16 09:27:09 2023
> Paths:
> 1/1 172.31.0.30/32 VRF vrf1 flags 0x20018
To avoid this situation, BGP updates that resolve over multiple
nexthops are using the unique per-vrf label.
- recursive route case
Prefixes that need a recursive route to be resolved can
also be eligible for mpls allocation per nexthop. In that
case, the nexthop will be the recursive nexthop calculated.
To achieve this, all nexthop types in bnc contexts are valid,
except for the blackhole nexthops.
- network declared prefixes
Nexthop tracking is used to look for the reachability of the
prefixes. When the the 'no bgp network import-check' command
is used, network declared prefixes are maintained active,
even if there is no active nexthop.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Memory leaks are observed in the cleanup code. When “no router bgp" is executed,
cleanup in that flow for aggregate-address command is not taken care.
fixes the below leak:
--
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444:Direct leak of 152 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #0 0x7f163e911037 in __interceptor_calloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #1 0x7f163e4b9259 in qcalloc lib/memory.c:105
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #2 0x562bf42ebbd5 in bgp_aggregate_new bgpd/bgp_route.c:7239
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #3 0x562bf42f14e8 in bgp_aggregate_set bgpd/bgp_route.c:8421
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #4 0x562bf42f1e55 in aggregate_addressv6_magic bgpd/bgp_route.c:8592
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #5 0x562bf42be3f5 in aggregate_addressv6 bgpd/bgp_route_clippy.c:341
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #6 0x7f163e3f1e1b in cmd_execute_command_real lib/command.c:988
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #7 0x7f163e3f219c in cmd_execute_command lib/command.c:1048
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #8 0x7f163e3f2df4 in cmd_execute lib/command.c:1215
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #9 0x7f163e5a2d73 in vty_command lib/vty.c:544
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #10 0x7f163e5a79c8 in vty_execute lib/vty.c:1307
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #11 0x7f163e5ad299 in vtysh_read lib/vty.c:2216
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #12 0x7f163e593f16 in event_call lib/event.c:1995
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #13 0x7f163e47c839 in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1185
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #14 0x562bf414e58d in main bgpd/bgp_main.c:505
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #15 0x7f163de66d09 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444-
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444:Direct leak of 152 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #0 0x7f163e911037 in __interceptor_calloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #1 0x7f163e4b9259 in qcalloc lib/memory.c:105
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #2 0x562bf42ebbd5 in bgp_aggregate_new bgpd/bgp_route.c:7239
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #3 0x562bf42f14e8 in bgp_aggregate_set bgpd/bgp_route.c:8421
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #4 0x562bf42f1cde in aggregate_addressv4_magic bgpd/bgp_route.c:8543
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #5 0x562bf42bd258 in aggregate_addressv4 bgpd/bgp_route_clippy.c:255
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #6 0x7f163e3f1e1b in cmd_execute_command_real lib/command.c:988
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #7 0x7f163e3f219c in cmd_execute_command lib/command.c:1048
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #8 0x7f163e3f2df4 in cmd_execute lib/command.c:1215
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #9 0x7f163e5a2d73 in vty_command lib/vty.c:544
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #10 0x7f163e5a79c8 in vty_execute lib/vty.c:1307
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #11 0x7f163e5ad299 in vtysh_read lib/vty.c:2216
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #12 0x7f163e593f16 in event_call lib/event.c:1995
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #13 0x7f163e47c839 in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1185
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #14 0x562bf414e58d in main bgpd/bgp_main.c:505
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #15 0x7f163de66d09 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444-
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444-SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 304 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
Signed-off-by: Samanvitha B Bhargav <bsamanvitha@vmware.com>
Effectively a massive search and replace of
`struct thread` to `struct event`. Using the
term `thread` gives people the thought that
this event system is a pthread when it is not
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This commit introduces a new method to associate a label to
prefixes to export to a VPNv4 backbone. All the methods to
associate a label to a BGP update is documented in rfc4364,
chapter 4.3.2. Initially, the "single label for an entire
VRF" method was available. This commit adds "single label
for each attachment circuit" method.
The change impacts the control-plane, because each BGP update
is checked to know if the nexthop has reachability in the VRF
or not. If this is the case, then a unique label for a given
destination IP in the VRF will be picked up. This label will
be reused for an other BGP update that will have the same
nexthop IP address.
The change impacts the data-plane, because the MPLs pop
mechanism applied to incoming labelled packets changes: the
MPLS label is popped, and the packet is directly sent to the
connected nexthop described in the previous outgoing BGP VPN
update.
By default per-vrf mode is done, but the user may choose
the per-nexthop mode, by using the vty command from the
previous commit. In the latter case, a per-vrf label
will however be allocated to handle networks that are not directly
connected. This is the case for local traffic for instance.
The change also include the following:
- ECMP case
In case a route is learnt in a given VRF, and is resolved via an
ECMP nexthop. This implies that when exporting the route as a BGP
update, if label allocation per nexthop is used, then two possible
MPLS values could be picked up, which is not possible with the
current implementation. Actually, the NLRI for VPNv4 stores one
prefix, and one single label value, not two. Today, RFC8277 with
multiple label capability is not yet available.
To avoid this corner case, when a route is resolved via more than one
nexthop, the label allocation per nexthop will not apply, and the
default per-vrf label will be chosen.
Let us imagine BGP redistributes a static route using the `172.31.0.20`
nexthop. The nexthop resolution will find two different nexthops fo a
unique BGP update.
> r1# show running-config
> [..]
> vrf vrf1
> ip route 172.31.0.30/32 172.31.0.20
> r1# show bgp vrf vrf1 nexthop
> [..]
> 172.31.0.20 valid [IGP metric 0], #paths 1
> gate 192.0.2.11
> gate 192.0.2.12
> Last update: Mon Jan 16 09:27:09 2023
> Paths:
> 1/1 172.31.0.30/32 VRF vrf1 flags 0x20018
To avoid this situation, BGP updates that resolve over multiple
nexthops are using the unique per-vrf label.
- recursive route case
Prefixes that need a recursive route to be resolved can
also be eligible for mpls allocation per nexthop. In that
case, the nexthop will be the recursive nexthop calculated.
To achieve this, all nexthop types in bnc contexts are valid,
except for the blackhole nexthops.
- network declared prefixes
Nexthop tracking is used to look for the reachability of the
prefixes. When the the 'no bgp network import-check' command
is used, network declared prefixes are maintained active,
even if there is no active nexthop.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Before:
```
r1# sh ip bgp wide
BGP table version is 1, local router ID is 192.168.2.1, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 65001
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
* 172.16.255.254/32 192.168.2.2 0 0 (65003) i
*> 192.168.1.2 0 0 (65002) i
Displayed 1 routes and 2 total paths
r1#
```
After:
```
r1# sh ip bgp wide
BGP table version is 1, local router ID is 192.168.2.1, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 65001
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
* 172.16.255.254/32 192.168.2.2 0 0 (65003) i
*> 192.168.1.2 0 0 (65002) i
Displayed 1 routes and 2 total paths
r1#
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
"show bgp <afi> <safi> json detail" was incorrectly displaying header
information from route_vty_out_detail_header() as an element of the
"paths" array. This corrects the behavior for 'json detail' so that a
route holds a dictionary with keys for "paths" and header info, which
aligns with how we structure the output for a specific prefix, e.g.
"show bgp <afi> <safi> <prefix> json".
Before:
```
ub20# show ip bgp json detail
{
"vrfId": 0,
"vrfName": "default",
"tableVersion": 3,
"routerId": "100.64.0.222",
"defaultLocPrf": 100,
"localAS": 1,
"routes": { "2.2.2.2/32": [
{ <<<<<<<<< should be outside the array
"prefix":"2.2.2.2/32",
"version":1,
"advertisedTo":{
"192.168.122.12":{
"hostname":"ub20-2"
}
}
},
{
"aspath":{
"string":"Local",
"segments":[
],
"length":0
},
<snip>
```
After:
```
ub20# show ip bgp json detail
{
"vrfId": 0,
"vrfName": "default",
"tableVersion": 3,
"routerId": "100.64.0.222",
"defaultLocPrf": 100,
"localAS": 1,
"routes": { "2.2.2.2/32": {
"prefix": "2.2.2.2/32",
"version": "1",
"advertisedTo": {
"192.168.122.12":{
"hostname":"ub20-2"
}
}
,"paths": [
{
"aspath":{
"string":"Local",
"segments":[
],
"length":0
},
```
Signed-off-by: Trey Aspelund <taspelund@nvidia.com>
Add a keyword self-originate" to extend current CLI commands to filter out self-originated routes only
a\) CLI to show ipv4/ipv6 self-originated routes
"show [ip] bgp [afi] [safi] [all] self-originate [wide|json]"
b\) CLI to show evpn self-originated routes
"show bgp l2vpn evpn route [detail] [type <ead|macip|multicast|es|prefix|1|2|3|4|5>] self-originate [json]"
Signed-off-by: Karl Quan <kquan@nvidia.com>
The bgp network command creates static routes with an optional
route-distinguisher parameter for VPN and EVPN address families.
Store the rd parameter in those static routes. This will be used
by the 'show running-config' later.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
These two functions always return 0. As such any and all
tests against this make no sense. Remove the return 0
to a void and follow the chain, logically, to remove all
the dead code.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
```
unet> sh pe2 vtysh -c 'sh ip bgp ipv4 vpn detail-routes'
BGP table version is 4, local router ID is 10.10.10.20, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 65001
Route Distinguisher: 192.168.2.2:2
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.2.2:2:10.0.0.0/24, version 1
not allocated
Paths: (1 available, best #1)
Not advertised to any peer
65000
192.168.2.1 from 0.0.0.0 (10.10.10.20) vrf RED(4) announce-nh-self
Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 50, valid, sourced, local, best (First path received)
Extended Community: RT:192.168.2.2:2
Originator: 10.10.10.20
Remote label: 2222
Last update: Tue Dec 20 13:01:20 2022
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.2.2:2:172.16.255.1/32, version 2
not allocated
Paths: (1 available, best #1)
Not advertised to any peer
65000
192.168.2.1 from 0.0.0.0 (10.10.10.20) vrf RED(4) announce-nh-self
Origin incomplete, localpref 50, valid, sourced, local, best (First path received)
Extended Community: RT:192.168.2.2:2
Originator: 10.10.10.20
Remote label: 2222
Last update: Tue Dec 20 13:01:20 2022
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.2.2:2:192.168.1.0/24, version 3
not allocated
Paths: (1 available, best #1)
Not advertised to any peer
65000
192.168.2.1 from 0.0.0.0 (10.10.10.20) vrf RED(4) announce-nh-self
Origin incomplete, localpref 50, valid, sourced, local, best (First path received)
Extended Community: RT:192.168.2.2:2
Originator: 10.10.10.20
Remote label: 2222
Last update: Tue Dec 20 13:01:20 2022
BGP routing table entry for 192.168.2.2:2:192.168.2.0/24, version 4
not allocated
Paths: (1 available, best #1)
Not advertised to any peer
65000
192.168.2.1 from 0.0.0.0 (10.10.10.20) vrf RED(4) announce-nh-self
Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 50, valid, sourced, local, best (First path received)
Extended Community: RT:192.168.2.2:2
Originator: 10.10.10.20
Remote label: 2222
Last update: Tue Dec 20 13:01:20 2022
Displayed 4 routes and 4 total paths
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Not all places were checking to see if soft reconfiguration
was turned on before calling into it to do all that work.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Column headers in BGP routes table are not aligned with data when
RPKI status is available. This was fixed to insert a space at the
beginning of the header and at the beginning of lines that do not
have RPKI status.
This fix requires that several testing templates be adjusted to
match the new output.
Signed-off-by: Wayne Morrison <wmorrison@netgate.com>
When bgp is using `bgp suppress-fib-pending` and the end
operator is using network statements, bgp was not sending
the network'ed prefix'es to it's peers. Fix this.
Also update the test cases for bgp_suppress_fib to test
this new corner case( I am sure that there are going to
be others that will need to be added ).
Fixes: #12112
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Re-work the bgp vni table to use separately keyed tables for type2
routes.
So, with type2 routes, we have the main table keyed off of the IP and a
new MAC table keyed off of MACs.
By separating out the two, we are able to run path selection separately
for the neigh and mac. Keeping the two separate is also more in-line
with what happens in zebra (they are managed comptletely seperate).
With this change type2 routes go into each table like so:
```
Remote MAC-IP -> IP Table & MAC Table
Remote MAC -> MAC Table
Local MAC-IP -> IP Table
Local MAC -> MAC Table
```
The difference for local is necessary because we should not ever allow
multiple paths for a local MAC.
Also cleaned up the commands for querying the vni tables:
```
show bgp vni all type ...
show bgp vni VNI type ...
```
Old commands will be deprecated in a separate commit.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
Use the IP addr of type2/macip routes only for the hash/key
of the VNI table and carry the MAC in a path_info_extra attribute.
There is exists situations that can be hit during extended MAC mobility events
where two MACs could be pointing to the same IP in our global table. It
is requires very specific timings.
When that happens, BPG would (because we key'd on both MAC and IP)
install both into it's VNI table as separate entries, but zebra only
knows/needs to know about a single IP -> MAC relationship for it's VNI
table's type2 routes. So it was compleletly undeterministic which one
zebra would end up with in these timing situations.
With these changes, we move BGP's VNI table to key'd the same as Zebra's
and now a single IP will have multiple path_info's with a path_info_extra
that is carrying the MAC info for each path.
BGP will then run best path to deterministically decide which one to send to
zebra during the occasions where there exist's two possible MACs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Worley <sworley@nvidia.com>
RFC4364 describes peerings between multiple AS domains, to ease
the continuity of VPN services across multiple SPs. This commit
implements a sub-set of IETF option b) described in chapter 10 b.
The ASBR to ASBR approach is taken, with an EBGP peering between
the two routers. The EBGP peering must be directly connected to
the outgoing interface used. In those conditions, the next hop
is directly connected, and there is no need to have a transport
label to convey the VPN label. A new vty command is added on a
per interface basis:
This command if enabled, will permit to convey BGP VPN labels
without any transport labels (i.e. with implicit-null label).
restriction:
this command is used only for EBGP directly connected peerings.
Other use cases are not covered.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Move the logic to check the mp_nexthop_len against v6 lengths into its
own macro so we can apply that logic elsewhere on its own without always
checking for presence of BGP_ATTR_NEXT_HOP.
Signed-off-by: Trey Aspelund <taspelund@nvidia.com>
The same as with prefix-list/route-maps/etc.
```
donatas-pc# show ip access-list spine
ZEBRA:
Zebra IP access list spine
seq 5 permit 200.200.200.200/32
BGP:
Zebra IP access list spine
seq 5 permit 200.200.200.200/32
PIM:
Zebra IP access list spine
seq 5 permit 200.200.200.200/32
BABELD:
Zebra IP access list spine
seq 5 permit 200.200.200.200/32
donatas-pc# show bgp ipv4 unicast access-list
ACCESSLIST_NAME Access-list name
spine
donatas-pc# show bgp ipv4 unicast access-list spine
BGP table version is 9, local router ID is 172.17.0.3, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 200.200.200.200/32
enp3s0 0 0 65000 3456 ?
Displayed 1 routes and 10 total paths
donatas-pc#
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
This patch adds transpostion_offset and transposition_len to bgp_sid_info,
and transposes SID only at bgp_zebra_announce.
Signed-off-by: Ryoga Saito <ryoga.saito@linecorp.com>
Currently the Wait for Install code ( bgp_suppress_fib ) does
not properly handle two states from zebra: ROUTE_INSTALL_FAILED
and BETTER_ADMIN_DISTANCE_WON. Pre this change the WFI code
would just never notify our peers about a route install failure
but more is needed. In the ROUTE_INSTALL_FAILED and the
BETTER_ADMIN_DISTANCE_WON we need to notify our peers with
a withdrawal about the route, else we will continue to
draw traffic to us when we cannot legally do so.
Why is this needed? In either case imagine that we've already
received a bgp route, installed it and sent to our peers.
In the Better admin distance won case, say a static route is installed
at this point in time we must stop advertising the route through
us since we are not installed. As such a withdrawal must be sent.
In the ROUTE_INSTALL_FAILED case, the code was not properly handling
the situation where we have Route A, it was successfully installed
and then we received a update to Route A that was attempted to be
installed but failed. In this case we also need to send a withdrawal
Finally update the bgp_suppress_fib topotest to test both of these
situations.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Description:
Incorrect behavior during best path selection for the imported routes.
Imported routes are always treated as eBGP routes.
Change is intended for fixing the issues related to
bgp best path selection for leaked routes:
- FRR does ecmp for the imported routes,
even without any ecmp related config.
If the same prefix is imported from two different VRFs,
then we configure the route with ecmp even without
any ecmp related config.
- Locally imported routes are preferred over imported
eBGP routes.
If there is a local route and eBGP learned route
for the same prefix, if we import both the routes,
imported local route is selected as best path.
- Same route is imported from multiple tenant VRFs,
both imported routes point to the same VRF in nexthop.
- When the same route with same nexthop in two different VRFs
is imported from those two VRFs, route is not installed as ecmp,
even though we had ecmp config.
- During best path selection, while comparing the paths for imported routes,
we should correctly refer to the original route i.e. the ultimate path.
- When the same route is imported from multiple VRF,
use the correct VRF while installing in the FIB.
- When same route is imported from two different tenant VRFs,
while comparing bgp path info as part of bgp best path selection,
we should ideally also compare corresponding VRFs.
See-also: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/files/7169555/FRR.and.Cisco.VRF-Lite.Behaviour.pdf
Co-authored-by: Santosh P K <sapk@vmware.com>
Co-authored-by: Kantesh Mundaragi <kmundaragi@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Iqra Siddiqui <imujeebsiddi@vmware.com>
```
exit1-debian-9# show ip route 172.16.16.1/32
Routing entry for 172.16.16.1/32
Known via "bgp", distance 20, metric 0, best
Last update 00:00:28 ago
* 192.168.0.2, via eth1, weight 1
AS-Path : 65003
Communities : first 65001:2 65001:3
Large-Communities: 65001:1:1 65001:1:2 65001:1:3
Selection reason : First path received
```
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@gmail.com>
