Not sure why it's here, but looks like it was since the beginning, let's see
if we can drop it.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Reuse subgroup_process_announce_selected(). It does the same as we do here
duplicating the logic.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
In the json output of show bgp all json, the l2VpnEvpn afi-safi is
missing the 'routes' key making the json output format invalid.
Before Fix:
torm-11# sh bgp all json
{
<SNIP>....................
"l2VpnEvpn":{
{
"27.0.0.15:2":{
"rd":"27.0.0.15:2",
"[4]:[03:44:38:39:ff:ff:01:00:00:01]:[32]:[27.0.0.15]":{
"prefix":"[4]:[03:44:38:39:ff:ff:01:00:00:01]:[32]:[27.0.0.15]",
"prefixLen":352,
"paths":[
<SNIP>....................
After Fix:
torm-11# sh bgp all json
{
<SNIP>....................
"l2VpnEvpn":{
"routes":{
"27.0.0.15:2":{
"rd":"27.0.0.15:2",
"[1]:[0]:[03:44:38:39:ff:ff:01:00:00:01]:[128]:[::]:[0]":{
"prefix":"[1]:[0]:[03:44:38:39:ff:ff:01:00:00:01]:[128]:[::]:[0]",
"prefixLen":352,
"paths":[
Issue: 3472865
Ticket:#3472865
Signed-off-by: Rajasekar Raja <rajasekarr@nvidia.com>
This can lead into some garbage outputs, that can't be decoded in utf-8 or so.
This was catched when testing 76b246aa1f.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
In ebgp+ ibgp deployment aggregate summary-only route
selected path should always be locally originated
summary route.
When aggregate route summary-only config is removed
The selected path is iBGP peer as its lower cost
Upon reconfiguring aggregate route summary-only,
the locally originated is not selected due to
always choosing first path attribute and bailing
out as no change in route update.
Ticket:#3467890
Issue:3467890
Testing Done:
Config:
------
TORC11(config-router)#router bgp
TORC11(config-router)# address-family ipv4 unicast
TORC11(config-router-af)# aggregate-address 184.123.0.0/16
summary-only
TORC11(config-router-af)# no aggregate-address 184.123.0.0/16
summary-only
TORC11(config-router-af)# aggregate-address 184.123.0.0/16
summary-only
Before fix:
-----------
*> 184.123.0.0/16 ::(TORC11) 0 32768 i
* uplink1 0 4435 5546 i
* uplink2 0 4435 5546 i
* i peerlink-3 0 100 0 i
After fix:
----------
*> 184.123.0.0/16 ::(TORC11) 0 32768 i
* i peerlink-3 0 100 0 i
* uplink2 0 4435 5546 i
* uplink1 0 4435 5546 i
Signed-off-by: Chirag Shah <chirag@nvidia.com>
This is a preliminary work to export redistributed routes from
a given VRF in an VPN network. The exportation works well, when
the label allocation is based on an per-vrf mode, but not on
a per nexthop mode.
To associate a label with a connected nexthop, the nexthop
tracking contexts are used. Until today, there was no tracking
context for redistributed routes. But when using this vpn
allocation mode, one needs to know whether the route is directly
connected or not. When using the nexthop tracking context, the
nexthop attribute of the bgp update needs to have the nexthop
properly set. This was not the case for the mp_nexthop_global_in
attribute which was empty.
This commit is mandatory in order to later use nexthop tracking
context.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
This commit addresses an issue with an MPLS VPN network
redistributing static routes that are exported to the VPN,
and where the labels are allocated per next-hop.
For that purpose, the nexthop of the static routes is
checked against the nexthop tracking. The validation
of a valid nexthop will trigger the use of a unique
label for all prefixes using that destination.
However, the nexthop fails to be validated, with the
following message:
> evaluate_paths: prefix 172:31::14/128 (vrf vrf1), ignoring path due to
> martian or self-next-hop
The reason is due to the way the attr is created.
By default, the ATTR_NEXTHOP attribute is set for
all prefixes, whereas this flag should only be valid
for IPv4. In the case there is an IPv6 nexthop, remove
the ATTR_NEXTHOP flag.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Adding support to show cmds like show bgp vrf all detail, show bgp
<afi> <safi> detail & show bgp <vrf> <afi> <safi> detail
Issue:3168406
Ticket:#3168406
Signed-off-by: Rajasekar Raja <rajasekarr@nvidia.com>
Until now, the bgp local paths were using the default null label
defined. It was not possible to select the null label for the ipv4
or the ipv6 address families.
This commit addresses this issues by adding two extra-parameters
to the BGP labeled-unicast command.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
The command `show bgp ipv4 uni neigh A.B.C.D received-routes detail`
was not displaying anything.
Fix the code to display the received routes from the ones that
have been filtered. In this case we need to fudge up a bgp_dest
and a bgp_path_info to make it work.
Old output:
janelle.pinkbelly.org# show bgp ipv4 uni neighbors 192.168.119.224 received-routes detail
BGP table version is 1711405, local router ID is 192.168.44.1, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 64539
Total number of prefixes 3 (3 filtered)
janelle.pinkbelly.org#
New output:
janelle.pinkbelly.org# show bgp ipv4 uni neighbors 192.168.119.224 received-routes detail
BGP table version is 0, local router ID is 192.168.44.1, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 64539
BGP routing table entry for 1.2.3.0/24, version 0
Paths: (1 available, no best path)
Not advertised to any peer
3291, (aggregated by 3291 192.168.122.1)
192.168.119.224 (inaccessible, import-check enabled) from 192.168.119.224 (192.168.122.1)
Origin IGP, metric 0, invalid, external, atomic-aggregate, rpki validation-state: not found
Community: 55:66
Last update: Fri Apr 14 08:46:48 2023
BGP routing table entry for 1.2.3.4/32, version 0
Paths: (1 available, no best path)
Not advertised to any peer
3291
192.168.119.224 (inaccessible, import-check enabled) from 192.168.119.224 (192.168.122.1)
Origin IGP, metric 0, invalid, external, rpki validation-state: not found
Community: 33:44
Last update: Fri Apr 14 08:46:48 2023
BGP routing table entry for 1.2.3.5/32, version 0
Paths: (1 available, no best path)
Not advertised to any peer
3291
192.168.119.224 (inaccessible, import-check enabled) from 192.168.119.224 (192.168.122.1)
Origin IGP, metric 0, invalid, external, rpki validation-state: not found
Community: 33:44
Last update: Fri Apr 14 08:46:48 2023
Total number of prefixes 3 (3 filtered)
janelle.pinkbelly.org# show bgp ipv4 uni
No BGP prefixes displayed, 0 exist
janelle.pinkbelly.org#
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Coverity points out that rd_str has already been
deref'ed in all paths leading to this spot. No
need to keep at it.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
1. Consider a established L2VPN EVPN BGP peer with soft-reconfiguartion
inbound configured
2. When the interface of this directly connected BGP peer is shutdown,
bgp_soft_reconfig_table_update() is called, which memsets the evpn buffer
and calls bgp_update() with received attributes stored in ain table(ain->attr).
In bgp_update(), evpn_overlay attribute in ain->attr (which is an interned
attr) was modified by doing a memcpy
3. Above action causes 2 attributes in the attrhash (which were previously different)
to match!
4. Later during fsm change event of the peer, bgp_adj_in_remove() is called
to clean up the ain->attr. But, because 2 attrs in attrhash match, it causes
BGP to assert in bgp_attr_unintern()
Signed-off-by: Pooja Jagadeesh Doijode <pdoijode@nvidia.com>
kttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-node-target-ext-comm
unet> sh r1 vtysh -c 'sh ip bgp nei 192.168.1.2 adver'
BGP table version is 1, local router ID is 192.168.1.1, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 65001
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 10.10.10.10/32 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
Total number of prefixes 1
unet> sh r1 vtysh -c 'sh ip bgp nei 192.168.1.3 adver'
BGP table version is 1, local router ID is 192.168.1.1, vrf id 0
Default local pref 100, local AS 65001
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, = multipath,
i internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, R Removed
Nexthop codes: @NNN nexthop's vrf id, < announce-nh-self
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 10.10.10.10/32 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
Total number of prefixes 1
unet> sh r2 vtysh -c 'show ip bgp 10.10.10.10/32'
% Network not in table
unet> sh r3 vtysh -c 'show ip bgp 10.10.10.10/32'
BGP routing table entry for 10.10.10.10/32, version 1
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
Advertised to non peer-group peers:
192.168.1.1
65001
192.168.1.1 from 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1)
Origin IGP, metric 0, valid, external, best (First path received)
Extended Community: NT:192.168.1.3 NT:192.168.1.4
Last update: Tue Apr 11 23:19:33 2023
unet>
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
The BGP local label value is not re-set when the prefix
is either a network or an aggregate prefix. Ensure to
get the appropriate label value each time the 'need_imp_null_label()'
function has to return true.
Fixes: 7ee70320d3 ("bgpd: add cli command to control explicit-null label usage")
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
In BGP labeled unicast address-family, it is not possible to
send explicit-null label values with redistributed or network
declared prefixes.
A new CLI command is introduced:
> [no] bgp labeled-unicast explicit-null
When used, the explicit-null value for IPv4 ('0' value) or
IPv6 ('2' value) will be used.
It is necessary to reconfigure the networks or the
redistribution in order to inherit this new behaviour.
Add the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
The json structure changes used for 'json detail' show commands are not
very straightforward and might require code analysis to understand.
This addscommentary to the flow to explain the change in structure.
Signed-off-by: Trey Aspelund <taspelund@nvidia.com>
Memory leaks are observed in the cleanup code. When “no router bgp" is executed,
cleanup in that flow for aggregate-address command is not taken care.
fixes the below leak:
--
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444:Direct leak of 152 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #0 0x7f163e911037 in __interceptor_calloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #1 0x7f163e4b9259 in qcalloc lib/memory.c:105
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #2 0x562bf42ebbd5 in bgp_aggregate_new bgpd/bgp_route.c:7239
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #3 0x562bf42f14e8 in bgp_aggregate_set bgpd/bgp_route.c:8421
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #4 0x562bf42f1e55 in aggregate_addressv6_magic bgpd/bgp_route.c:8592
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #5 0x562bf42be3f5 in aggregate_addressv6 bgpd/bgp_route_clippy.c:341
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #6 0x7f163e3f1e1b in cmd_execute_command_real lib/command.c:988
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #7 0x7f163e3f219c in cmd_execute_command lib/command.c:1048
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #8 0x7f163e3f2df4 in cmd_execute lib/command.c:1215
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #9 0x7f163e5a2d73 in vty_command lib/vty.c:544
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #10 0x7f163e5a79c8 in vty_execute lib/vty.c:1307
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #11 0x7f163e5ad299 in vtysh_read lib/vty.c:2216
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #12 0x7f163e593f16 in event_call lib/event.c:1995
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #13 0x7f163e47c839 in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1185
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #14 0x562bf414e58d in main bgpd/bgp_main.c:505
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #15 0x7f163de66d09 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444-
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444:Direct leak of 152 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #0 0x7f163e911037 in __interceptor_calloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #1 0x7f163e4b9259 in qcalloc lib/memory.c:105
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #2 0x562bf42ebbd5 in bgp_aggregate_new bgpd/bgp_route.c:7239
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #3 0x562bf42f14e8 in bgp_aggregate_set bgpd/bgp_route.c:8421
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #4 0x562bf42f1cde in aggregate_addressv4_magic bgpd/bgp_route.c:8543
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #5 0x562bf42bd258 in aggregate_addressv4 bgpd/bgp_route_clippy.c:255
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #6 0x7f163e3f1e1b in cmd_execute_command_real lib/command.c:988
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #7 0x7f163e3f219c in cmd_execute_command lib/command.c:1048
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #8 0x7f163e3f2df4 in cmd_execute lib/command.c:1215
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #9 0x7f163e5a2d73 in vty_command lib/vty.c:544
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #10 0x7f163e5a79c8 in vty_execute lib/vty.c:1307
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #11 0x7f163e5ad299 in vtysh_read lib/vty.c:2216
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #12 0x7f163e593f16 in event_call lib/event.c:1995
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #13 0x7f163e47c839 in frr_run lib/libfrr.c:1185
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #14 0x562bf414e58d in main bgpd/bgp_main.c:505
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444- #15 0x7f163de66d09 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444-
./bgp_local_asn_dot.test_bgp_local_asn_dot_agg/r3.bgpd.asan.3410444-SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 304 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
Signed-off-by: Samanvitha B Bhargav <bsamanvitha@vmware.com>
For instance, if we receive the routes from the peer with the next-hop as me,
but those routes shares the same network, we can fake the next-hop.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
Effectively a massive search and replace of
`struct thread` to `struct event`. Using the
term `thread` gives people the thought that
this event system is a pthread when it is not
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This is a first in a series of commits, whose goal is to rename
the thread system in FRR to an event system. There is a continual
problem where people are confusing `struct thread` with a true
pthread. In reality, our entire thread.c is an event system.
In this commit rename the thread.[ch] files to event.[ch].
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
The flag for telling BGP that a route is expected to be installed
first before notifying a peer was always being set upon receipt
of a path that could be accepted as bestpath. This is not correct:
imagine that you have a peer sending you a route and you have a
network statement that covers the same route. Irrelevant if the
network statement would win the flag on the dest was being set
in bgp_update. Thus you could get into a situation where
the network statement path wins but since the flag is set on
the node, it will never be announced to a peer.
Let's just move the setting of the flag into bgp_zebra_announce
and _withdraw. In _announce set the flag to TRUE when suppress-fib
is enabled. In _withdraw just always unset the flag as that a withdrawal
does not need to wait for rib removal before announcing. This will
cover the case when a network statement is added after the route has
been learned from a peer.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
This is a preliminary work to export redistributed routes from
a given VRF in an VPN network. The exportation works well, when
the label allocation is based on an per-vrf mode, but not on
a per nexthop mode.
To associate a label with a connected nexthop, the nexthop
tracking contexts are used. Until today, there was no tracking
context for redistributed routes. But when using this vpn
allocation mode, one needs to know whether the route is directly
connected or not. When using the nexthop tracking context, the
nexthop attribute of the bgp update needs to have the nexthop
properly set. This was not the case for the mp_nexthop_global_in
attribute which was empty.
This commit is mandatory in order to later use nexthop tracking
context.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
This commit addresses an issue with an MPLS VPN network
redistributing static routes that are exported to the VPN,
and where the labels are allocated per next-hop.
For that purpose, the nexthop of the static routes is
checked against the nexthop tracking. The validation
of a valid nexthop will trigger the use of a unique
label for all prefixes using that destination.
However, the nexthop fails to be validated, with the
following message:
> evaluate_paths: prefix 172:31::14/128 (vrf vrf1), ignoring path due to
> martian or self-next-hop
The reason is due to the way the attr is created.
By default, the ATTR_NEXTHOP attribute is set for
all prefixes, whereas this flag should only be valid
for IPv4. In the case there is an IPv6 nexthop, remove
the ATTR_NEXTHOP flag.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Guibert <philippe.guibert@6wind.com>
Some debugs were especially hard to figure out in bgp_route.c
a) If using a %p pointer to print the bgp_path_info this
is pretty useless. Print where it came from instead
b) Use A.B.C.D/M(VRFNAME) when outputing the prefix
Just basically give more useful information.
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
Add a hash_clean_and_free() function as well as convert
the code to use it. This function also takes a double
pointer to the hash to set it NULL. Also it cleanly
does nothing if the pointer is NULL( as a bunch of
code tested for ).
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
If route-map deny match is returned, we should free previously dup'ed
attributes: aspath, community, large community, extended community.
Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <donatas@opensourcerouting.org>
a) Make it legible what type of message is being passed
back and forth instead of having to guess it from
the insufficient debugs
b) Make it explicit which bgp instance is sending this
data
c) Cleanup bgp_zebra_update to have a cleaner api
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@nvidia.com>
